MSA vs SWK vs TRSG Stock Comparison

MSA Safety, Stanley Black & Decker and Tungray Technologies Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MSA MSA Safety Inc
$179.23 -1.8% 1M +7.5% 1Y
Market cap
$6.92B
P/E
22.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.95B
Div. yield
1.19%
Power Tools Industrials
8 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

MSA Safety leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (MSA Safety 8, Stanley Black & Decker 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMSASWKTRSGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.92B $15.01B $19.82M SWK
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 22.0x 24.0x -1,477x MSA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.2x 17.1x — SWK
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.5% +0.6% — MSA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 16.1% 4.1% — MSA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 15.9% 6.6% — MSA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.8x 2.3x — MSA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.19% 3.35% — SWK
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +7.5% +37.9% -16.4% SWK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.2%/yr -11.7%/yr — MSA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.5% 36.5% 62.7% MSA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 78/100 59/100 — MSA

Percentile Scorecard

MSASWKTRSG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMSASWKTRSG
Valuation 58 #86 of 203 90 #22 of 203 55 #93 of 203
Growth 86 #27 of 188 81 #36 of 188 –
Profitability 97 #6 of 183 51 #91 of 183 –
Financial Health 76 #54 of 217 28 #157 of 217 74 #58 of 217
Shareholder Returns 74 #40 of 153 46 #83 of 153 –
Overall 78 59 –
  • MSA ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • SWK ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • TRSG ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMSASWKTRSGSPY
1 month -1.8%+8.8%-8.2% -0.2%
3 months -0.3%+5.5%-18.1% +3.9%
6 months +7.2%+26.9%-1.8% +8.2%
Year to date +11.9%+33.8%+8.5% +12.9%
1 year +7.5%+37.9%-16.4% +12.3%
3 years +13.7%+21.1%— +87.4%
3 years, per year +4.4%+6.6%— +23.3%
5 years +16.9%-46.3%— +67.9%
5 years, per year +3.2%-11.7%— +10.9%
10 years +224.9%-13.6%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +12.5%-1.5%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMSASWKTRSGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.5%36.5%62.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.1%32.3%61.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.811.41-0.04 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.291.04-0.26 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -34.9%-71.6%-86.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -11.7%-4.5%-28.7% -1.2%
52-week high $203.08$104.00$1.70 $779.14
52-week low $152.94$62.12$1.03 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMSASWKTRSG
P/E now vs peer median 22.0xmedian 25.2x 24.0xmedian 25.2x -1,477xmedian 25.2x
P/S now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 1.9x 1.0xmedian 1.9x 1.3xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.0xmedian 14.0x 10.6xmedian 14.0x —median 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 19.5xmedian 21.7x 11.6xmedian 21.7x -5.2xmedian 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median 4.9xmedian 2.3x 1.7xmedian 2.3x 1.1xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.12median 1.32 -4.57median 1.32 —median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMSASWKTRSG
Revenue $1.95B $15.25B –
Gross profit $925.88M $4.86B –
Operating income $413.17M $1.32B –
Net income $314.01M $620.50M –
Free cash flow $354.30M $1.29B –
R&D $68.19M – –
EPS (diluted) $8.11 $4.12 –
Cash & equivalents $200.06M $592.40M $6.64M
Total debt $599.74M $4.76B $6.23M
Shares (diluted) 38.70M 150.65M 15.00M
Enterprise value $6.20B $13.53B -$15.13M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMSASWKTRSG
P/E 22.0x 24.0x -1,477x
P/FCF 19.5x 11.6x -5.2x
P/Operating cash flow 17.0x 9.7x –
P/S 3.6x 1.0x 1.3x
P/B 4.9x 1.7x 1.1x
P/Tangible book 6.2x 2.5x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA 15.0x 10.6x –
EV/EBIT 17.7x 14.5x –
EV/Revenue 3.8x 1.3x –
EV/FCF 20.7x 14.9x –
EV/Operating cash flow 18.0x 12.4x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.12 -4.57 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMSASWKTRSG
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.5% 0.6% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.2% -2.0% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 8.2% 9.3% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 6.7% 11.2% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 10.8% 51.4% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 34.5% 149.6% –
Net income growth (1Y) 13.4% 29.7% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 186.8% -7.7% –
EPS growth (1Y) 15.3% 30.7% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 188.5% -5.3% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 26.3% 104.3% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 96.0% 96.8% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 40.3% 211.7% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 72.1% 110.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMSASWKTRSG
Gross margin 47.6% 31.9% –
EBITDA margin 25.1% 11.9% –
Operating margin 21.2% 8.6% –
Pretax margin 21.1% 5.6% –
Net margin 16.1% 4.1% –
FCF margin 18.2% 8.5% –
Operating cash flow margin 20.9% 10.2% –
Return on equity 22.8% 6.9% –
Return on assets 12.2% 3.0% –
Return on invested capital 15.9% 6.6% –
Return on capital employed 18.0% 8.0% –
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.7x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 2.5x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.0% 0.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMSASWKTRSG
Debt / assets 23.1% 23.7% 9.5%
Debt / equity 0.4x 0.5x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.8x 2.3x –
Debt / FCF 1.7x 3.7x –
Liabilities / assets 46.1% 55.4% 37.8%
Equity / assets 53.9% 44.6% 62.2%
Interest coverage 12.7x 2.8x –
Current ratio 3.2x 1.4x 1.9x
Quick ratio 1.9x 0.5x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.7x 0.1x 0.7x
Altman Z-score 5.92 2.48 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMSASWKTRSG
Dividend yield 1.2% 3.4% –
Net buyback yield 1.8% 1.8% –
Shareholder yield 3.0% 5.1% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – 81.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 39.0% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 1.3% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 1.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMSASWKTRSG
Forward P/E 19.2xFY2026 17.1xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $9.33FY2026 $5.81FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +17.7%FY2026 +24.4%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +3.4% +5.2% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.98BFY2026 $16.13BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +5.2%FY2026 +6.6%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +19.6% +0.4% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMSASWKTRSG
Held by institutions 91.0% 95.7% –
Institutions holding 457 771 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.0% +5.3% –
Institutions buying 236 417 –
Institutions selling 147 243 –
Buyers to sellers 1.61 1.72 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MSASWKTRSG
MSA 1.00 0.52 0.01
SWK 0.52 1.00 0.06
TRSG 0.01 0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MSA, SWK and TRSG?

Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) is the largest by market capitalisation: MSA Safety (MSA) $6.92B, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) $15.01B, Tungray Technologies (TRSG) $19.82M.

Which stock is cheaper, MSA, SWK and TRSG?

MSA Safety (MSA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (MSA Safety (MSA) 22.0x, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 24.0x, Tungray Technologies (TRSG) -1,477x). On next year's consensus earnings, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) is cheapest (MSA Safety (MSA) 19.2x, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 17.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

MSA Safety (MSA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: MSA Safety (MSA) +6.5%, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) +0.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

MSA Safety (MSA) has the highest net margin (MSA Safety (MSA) 16.1%, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 4.1%). On return on invested capital, MSA Safety (MSA) leads (MSA Safety (MSA) 15.9%, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 6.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) returned the most: MSA Safety (MSA) +7.5%, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) +37.9%, Tungray Technologies (TRSG) -16.4%. Over five years, MSA Safety (MSA) compounded fastest (MSA Safety (MSA) +3.2%/yr, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) -11.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) has the highest dividend yield: MSA Safety (MSA) 1.19%, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 3.35%. Tungray Technologies (TRSG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, MSA Safety (MSA) has been the steadiest (MSA Safety (MSA) 25.5%, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 36.5%, Tungray Technologies (TRSG) 62.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MSA, SWK and TRSG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, MSA Safety (MSA) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.