MS vs SHG Stock Comparison

Morgan Stanley and Shinhan Financial Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MS Morgan Stanley
$183.50 -6.5% 1M +12.0% 1Y
Market cap
$290.76B
P/E
14.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$80.16B
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
4 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Morgan Stanley leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Morgan Stanley 4, Shinhan Financial 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMSSHGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $290.76B $31.29B MS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 14.6x 8.3x SHG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.4x 7.4x SHG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +16.2% -2.5% MS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 5.9% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 3.9% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 10.1x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +12.0% +26.5% SHG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +12.5%/yr +14.3%/yr SHG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 28.4% 34.0% MS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 43/100 MS

Percentile Scorecard

MSSHG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMSSHG
Valuation 36 #231 of 362 80 #73 of 362
Growth 93 #17 of 221 22 #173 of 221
Profitability – 25 #151 of 200
Financial Health – 3 #197 of 203
Shareholder Returns 33 #228 of 342 87 #47 of 342
Overall 54 43
  • MS ranked among 370 companies in Banking
  • SHG ranked among 370 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMSSHGSPY
1 month -6.5%-19.4% -0.8%
3 months -14.5%-8.8% +3.5%
6 months -3.5%-2.3% +7.0%
Year to date +3.4%+21.6% +12.2%
1 year +12.0%+26.5% +13.0%
3 years +160.7%+159.6% +86.3%
3 years, per year +37.7%+37.5% +23.1%
5 years +80.1%+95.0% +68.6%
5 years, per year +12.5%+14.3% +11.0%
10 years +446.3%+70.8% +258.0%
10 years, per year +18.5%+5.5% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureMSSHGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 28.4%34.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 29.8%32.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.421.09 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.420.78 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -35.3%-36.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.7%-22.8% -1.8%
52-week high $228.55$84.56 $779.14
52-week low $154.37$51.42 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMSSHG
P/E now vs peer median 14.4xmedian 12.1x 8.5xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 3.4x 0.5xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 5.0x 15.5xmedian 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -16.3xmedian 11.0x 4.4xmedian 11.0x
P/B now vs peer median —median 1.2x 0.8xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.46median 1.36 6.02median 1.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMSSHG
Revenue $80.16B $64.00B
Operating income – $4.92B
Net income – $3.42B
Free cash flow – $7.15B
EPS (diluted) $12.65 $7.67
Total debt – $246.90B
Shares (diluted) 1.57B 488.92M
Enterprise value $290.76B $31.29B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMSSHG
P/E 14.4x 8.5x
P/FCF -16.3x 4.4x
P/Operating cash flow – 4.2x
P/S 3.6x 0.5x
P/B – 0.8x
P/Tangible book – 0.8x
EV/EBITDA – 15.5x
EV/EBIT – 18.3x
EV/Revenue 3.6x 1.4x
EV/FCF – 12.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – 12.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.46 6.02

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMSSHG
Revenue growth (1Y) 16.2% -2.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 14.1% -15.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – -52.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -10.7%
Net income growth (1Y) – -7.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -4.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 29.2% 5.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 30.9% 1.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 100.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 13.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 106.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 14.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMSSHG
Gross margin – –
EBITDA margin – 9.1%
Operating margin – 7.7%
Pretax margin – 12.1%
Net margin – 5.9%
FCF margin – 11.2%
Operating cash flow margin – 11.4%
Return on equity – 11.5%
Return on assets 1.2% 0.9%
Return on invested capital – 3.9%
Return on capital employed – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 2.1x
Stock comp / revenue – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMSSHG
Debt / assets – 10.8%
Debt / equity – 1.5x
Net debt / EBITDA – 10.1x
Debt / FCF – 8.2x
Liabilities / assets – 92.6%
Equity / assets – 7.4%
Interest coverage – 0.6x
Current ratio – –
Quick ratio – –
Cash ratio – –
Altman Z-score – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMSSHG
Dividend yield 2.3% 3.1%
Net buyback yield – 2.7%
Shareholder yield 2.3% 5.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMSSHG
Forward P/E 13.4xFY2026 7.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $13.66FY2026 $8.77FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +33.8%FY2026 +31.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -4.2% +10.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $80.05BFY2026 $13.05BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +13.3%FY2026 +24.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +13.3% -1.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMSSHG
Held by institutions 85.7% 5.1%
Institutions holding 2,740 301
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.5% +10.6%
Institutions buying 1,466 206
Institutions selling 939 59
Buyers to sellers 1.56 3.49

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MSSHG
MS 1.00 0.33
SHG 0.33 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MS and SHG?

Morgan Stanley (MS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Morgan Stanley (MS) $290.76B, Shinhan Financial (SHG) $31.29B.

Which stock is cheaper, MS and SHG?

Shinhan Financial (SHG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Morgan Stanley (MS) 14.6x, Shinhan Financial (SHG) 8.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Shinhan Financial (SHG) is cheapest (Morgan Stanley (MS) 13.4x, Shinhan Financial (SHG) 7.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Morgan Stanley (MS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Morgan Stanley (MS) +16.2%, Shinhan Financial (SHG) -2.5%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Shinhan Financial (SHG) returned the most: Morgan Stanley (MS) +12.0%, Shinhan Financial (SHG) +26.5%. Over five years, Shinhan Financial (SHG) compounded fastest (Morgan Stanley (MS) +12.5%/yr, Shinhan Financial (SHG) +14.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Morgan Stanley (MS) has been the steadiest (Morgan Stanley (MS) 28.4%, Shinhan Financial (SHG) 34.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do MS and SHG move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.33, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, MS and SHG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Morgan Stanley (MS) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.