MRX vs WFC vs GS Stock Comparison

Marex, Wells Fargo & Company and Goldman Sachs Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MRX Marex Group Ltd
$66.28 -7.0% 1M +117.2% 1Y
Market cap
$4.83B
P/E
11.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.45B
Div. yield
0.94%
Institutional Trading Financial Services
5 wins
WFC Wells Fargo & Company/Mn
$83.74 +3.6% 1M -3.6% 1Y
Market cap
$251.37B
P/E
11.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$87.23B
Div. yield
2.21%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
3 wins
GS Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$926.20 +1.1% 1M +16.9% 1Y
Market cap
$269.93B
P/E
13.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$69.70B
Div. yield
1.94%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Marex leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Marex 5, Wells Fargo & Company 3, Goldman Sachs 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMRXWFCGSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.83B $251.37B $269.93B GS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.1x 11.5x 13.0x MRX
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 10.1x 10.7x 12.3x MRX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +37.8% +5.4% +18.7% MRX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 17.4% 25.2% — WFC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 15.1% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.8x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.94% 2.21% 1.94% WFC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +117.2% -3.6% +16.9% MRX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +10.4%/yr +17.5%/yr GS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 45.0% 25.6% 31.9% WFC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 64/100 51/100 47/100 MRX

Percentile Scorecard

MRXWFCGS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMRXWFCGS
Valuation 96 #5 of 96 47 #193 of 361 16 #302 of 361
Growth 81 #13 of 65 52 #84 of 172 97 #6 of 172
Profitability 56 #29 of 65 65 #53 of 149 –
Financial Health – 12 #140 of 158 –
Shareholder Returns 24 #29 of 38 79 #71 of 338 28 #243 of 338
Overall 64 51 47
  • MRX ranked among 110 companies in Capital Markets
  • WFC ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • GS ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMRXWFCGSSPY
1 month -7.0%+3.6%+1.1% +0.9%
3 months +5.0%-0.2%-5.6% +5.9%
6 months +23.6%+2.7%+2.3% +8.5%
Year to date +72.8%-10.2%+5.4% +13.3%
1 year +117.2%-3.6%+16.9% +12.4%
3 years —+116.0%+219.5% +88.1%
3 years, per year —+29.3%+47.3% +23.5%
5 years —+63.7%+124.1% +68.2%
5 years, per year —+10.4%+17.5% +11.0%
10 years —+81.1%+422.9% +263.4%
10 years, per year —+6.1%+18.0% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureMRXWFCGSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 45.0%25.6%31.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 40.3%29.1%32.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.770.671.63 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.60-0.140.53 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -41.6%-38.7%-34.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -15.3%-13.1%-19.6% -0.9%
52-week high $78.27$96.39$1,152.07 $779.14
52-week low $30.20$73.42$773.70 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMRXWFCGS
P/E now vs peer median 11.1xmedian 30.1x 11.5xmedian 12.1x 13.0xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 3.0x 2.9xmedian 3.4x 3.9xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 14.1x 6.0xmedian 5.1x —median 5.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 15.8x 8.7xmedian 10.8x -6.4xmedian 10.8x
P/B now vs peer median —median 2.4x 1.4xmedian 1.2x 2.2xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.54 0.80median 1.32 0.26median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMRXWFCGS
Revenue $2.45B $87.23B $69.70B
Net income $426.20M $22.97B –
Free cash flow – $28.91B –
EPS (diluted) $5.59 $7.20 $69.89
Cash & equivalents $3.85B – $177.00B
Total debt – $221.04B –
Shares (diluted) 76.13M 3.05B 304.90M
Enterprise value -$8.09B $253.49B $269.93B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMRXWFCGS
P/E 11.1x 11.5x 13.0x
P/FCF – 8.7x -6.4x
P/Operating cash flow – 8.7x –
P/S 2.0x 2.9x 3.9x
P/B – 1.4x 2.2x
P/Tangible book – 1.4x 2.2x
EV/EBITDA 0.9x 6.0x –
EV/EBIT 0.9x 6.7x –
EV/Revenue 0.4x 5.4x 3.9x
EV/FCF – 16.3x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 16.3x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.80 0.26

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMRXWFCGS
Revenue growth (1Y) 37.8% 5.4% 18.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 2.0% 15.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 61.3% 9.1% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 6.8% –
EPS growth (1Y) 59.2% 16.2% 39.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 14.4% 49.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 303.3% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -0.6% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 303.3% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -0.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMRXWFCGS
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 45.1% 89.8% –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 21.7% 31.7% –
Net margin 17.4% 25.2% –
FCF margin – 33.1% –
Operating cash flow margin – 33.1% –
Return on equity – 12.9% –
Return on assets 1.1% 1.0% –
Return on invested capital – 15.1% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.3x –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMRXWFCGS
Debt / assets – 9.8% –
Debt / equity – 1.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.8x –
Debt / FCF – 7.6x –
Liabilities / assets – 92.1% 94.3%
Equity / assets – 7.9% 5.7%
Interest coverage 1.9x 1.6x –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMRXWFCGS
Dividend yield 0.9% 2.2% 1.9%
Net buyback yield – 5.6% –
Shareholder yield 0.9% 7.8% 1.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 24.6% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 19.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 5.6% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 6.7% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMRXWFCGS
Forward P/E 10.1xFY2026 10.7xFY2026 12.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.59FY2026 $7.82FY2026 $75.07FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +65.2%FY2026 +24.9%FY2026 +46.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +1.5% +7.3% -6.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.66BFY2026 $94.32BFY2026 $68.80BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +31.9%FY2026 +12.7%FY2026 +18.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +12.1% +4.3% +4.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMRXWFCGS
Held by institutions 79.7% 76.8% 72.1%
Institutions holding 219 2,878 3,150
Change in shares held, QoQ +8.3% +1.1% +1.1%
Institutions buying 146 1,293 1,553
Institutions selling 53 1,134 1,124
Buyers to sellers 2.75 1.14 1.38

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MRXWFCGS
MRX 1.00 0.15 0.24
WFC 0.15 1.00 0.44
GS 0.24 0.44 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MRX, WFC and GS?

Goldman Sachs (GS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Marex (MRX) $4.83B, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) $251.37B, Goldman Sachs (GS) $269.93B.

Which stock is cheaper, MRX, WFC and GS?

Marex (MRX) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Marex (MRX) 11.1x, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 11.5x, Goldman Sachs (GS) 13.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Marex (MRX) is cheapest (Marex (MRX) 10.1x, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 10.7x, Goldman Sachs (GS) 12.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Marex (MRX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Marex (MRX) +37.8%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) +5.4%, Goldman Sachs (GS) +18.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has the highest net margin (Marex (MRX) 17.4%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 25.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Marex (MRX) returned the most: Marex (MRX) +117.2%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) -3.6%, Goldman Sachs (GS) +16.9%. Over five years, Goldman Sachs (GS) compounded fastest (Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) +10.4%/yr, Goldman Sachs (GS) +17.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has the highest dividend yield: Marex (MRX) 0.94%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 2.21%, Goldman Sachs (GS) 1.94%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has been the steadiest (Marex (MRX) 45.0%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 25.6%, Goldman Sachs (GS) 31.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MRX, WFC and GS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Marex (MRX) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.