MRVL vs QCOM vs WRD Stock Comparison

Marvell Technology, Qualcomm and WeRide Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc.
$251.65 -0.1% 1M +184.5% 1Y
Market cap
$220.67B
P/E
85.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.45B
Div. yield
0.10%
Semiconductor Design Technology
5 wins
QCOM Qualcomm Inc/De
$182.97 -2.4% 1M +1.1% 1Y
Market cap
$193.40B
P/E
20.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$44.07B
Div. yield
1.98%
Semiconductor Design Technology
5 wins
WRD WeRide Inc.
$4.52 -18.3% 1M -61.4% 1Y
Market cap
$1.40B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$92.10M
Div. yield
–
Autonomous Driving Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Marvell Technology leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Marvell Technology 5, Qualcomm 5, WeRide 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMRVLQCOMWRDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $220.67B $193.40B $1.40B MRVL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 85.5x 20.9x -6.2x QCOM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 61.1x 17.0x — QCOM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +30.6% +1.9% +244.8% WRD
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 27.9% 21.0% -243.6% MRVL
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.8% 20.5% -24.9% QCOM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.4x 0.4x — MRVL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.10% 1.98% — QCOM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +184.5% +1.1% -61.4% MRVL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +29.7%/yr +6.6%/yr — MRVL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 79.1% 52.9% 60.2% QCOM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 50/100 62/100 66/100 WRD

Percentile Scorecard

MRVLQCOMWRD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMRVLQCOMWRD
Valuation 27 #69 of 94 80 #20 of 94 42 #8 of 13
Growth 90 #10 of 92 32 #63 of 92 91 #2 of 12
Profitability 62 #35 of 90 87 #13 of 90 82 #3 of 12
Financial Health 47 #53 of 99 29 #71 of 99 50 #7 of 13
Shareholder Returns 25 #55 of 73 82 #14 of 73 –
Overall 50 62 66
  • MRVL ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • QCOM ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • WRD ranked among 14 companies in Robotics and Automation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMRVLQCOMWRDSPY
1 month -0.1%-2.4%-18.3% +0.9%
3 months +54.0%+17.5%-21.8% +5.9%
6 months +60.7%+17.3%-39.6% +8.5%
Year to date +196.1%+7.0%-47.9% +13.3%
1 year +184.5%+1.1%-61.4% +12.4%
3 years +432.5%+71.9%— +88.1%
3 years, per year +74.7%+19.8%— +23.5%
5 years +267.4%+37.5%— +68.2%
5 years, per year +29.7%+6.6%— +11.0%
10 years +1,821.0%+167.5%— +263.4%
10 years, per year +34.4%+10.3%— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureMRVLQCOMWRDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 79.1%52.9%60.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 75.3%52.3%63.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.242.082.26 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.330.02-1.02 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -62.1%-45.6%-89.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -20.5%-27.1%-61.4% -0.9%
52-week high $316.43$251.02$11.72 $779.14
52-week low $73.73$124.07$4.08 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMRVLQCOMWRD
P/E now vs peer median 85.5xmedian 46.0x 20.9xmedian 46.0x -6.2x
P/S now vs peer median 23.4xmedian 7.9x 4.4xmedian 7.9x 15.1xmedian 17.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 78.5xmedian 28.3x 16.8xmedian 28.3x —
P/FCF now vs peer median 127.5xmedian 41.4x 18.6xmedian 41.4x —median 14.9x
P/B now vs peer median 11.9xmedian 4.6x 7.0xmedian 4.6x 1.5xmedian 1.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.82median 2.30 5.02median 2.30 —

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMRVLQCOMWRD
Revenue $9.45B $44.07B $92.10M
Gross profit $4.93B $23.90B $39.20M
Operating income $1.56B $10.22B -$260.29M
Net income $2.64B $9.26B -$237.93M
Free cash flow $1.73B $10.42B –
R&D $2.44B $9.89B $219.70M
EPS (diluted) $2.87 $8.66 –
Cash & equivalents $3.93B $4.53B $629.27M
Total debt $4.96B $12.78B $194.84M
Shares (diluted) 921.20M 1.07B –
Enterprise value $207.54B $153.32B -$1.65B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMRVLQCOMWRD
P/E 85.5x 20.9x -6.2x
P/FCF 127.5x 18.6x –
P/Operating cash flow 100.3x 15.6x –
P/S 23.4x 4.4x 15.1x
P/B 11.9x 7.0x 1.5x
P/Tangible book 13.6x 7.4x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA 78.5x 16.8x –
EV/EBIT 142.0x 19.4x -3.1x
EV/Revenue 23.5x 4.5x 8.7x
EV/FCF 128.1x 19.0x –
EV/Operating cash flow 100.8x 16.0x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.82 5.02 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMRVLQCOMWRD
Revenue growth (1Y) 30.6% 1.9% 244.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 18.9% 4.5% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 52.8% -0.8% 142.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 25.0% 3.2% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 1,577% -15.0% -22.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 100.2% 0.6% –
Net income growth (1Y) 2,653% -20.0% 29.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 107.8% 2.4% –
EPS growth (1Y) 2,512% -17.8% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 104.2% 4.2% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 19.3% -2.1% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 26.6% 12.7% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 12.8% -10.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 30.6% 14.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMRVLQCOMWRD
Gross margin 52.2% 54.2% 42.6%
EBITDA margin 29.9% 26.8% –
Operating margin 16.5% 23.2% -282.6%
Pretax margin 32.4% 25.4% -258.0%
Net margin 27.9% 21.0% -243.6%
FCF margin 18.3% 23.6% –
Operating cash flow margin 23.3% 28.1% –
Return on equity 14.4% 33.7% -24.1%
Return on assets 9.7% 16.2% -20.5%
Return on invested capital 5.8% 20.5% -24.9%
Return on capital employed 6.3% 22.3% -26.6%
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.8x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x 1.3x –
Stock comp / revenue 8.8% 7.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMRVLQCOMWRD
Debt / assets 18.0% 22.3% 6.3%
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.5x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.4x 0.4x –
Debt / FCF 2.9x 1.2x –
Liabilities / assets 32.7% 51.8% 17.5%
Equity / assets 67.3% 48.2% 82.5%
Interest coverage 7.2x 14.8x –
Current ratio 3.2x 2.0x 5.4x
Quick ratio 2.5x 1.1x 4.0x
Cash ratio 1.6x 0.7x 3.7x
Altman Z-score 15.52 6.17 2.34

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMRVLQCOMWRD
Dividend yield 0.1% 2.0% –
Net buyback yield -0.1% 4.6% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 6.5% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – 41.3% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 36.7% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 0.8% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 3.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMRVLQCOMWRD
Forward P/E 61.1xFY2026 17.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $4.12FY2026 $10.79FY2026 $-0.62FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +45.1%FY2026 -10.3%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +83.5% -3.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $11.42BFY2026 $45.55BFY2026 $149.56MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +39.5%FY2026 +3.2%FY2026 +52.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +80.2% -5.0% +88.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMRVLQCOMWRD
Held by institutions 78.7% 79.7% 26.0%
Institutions holding 2,216 3,031 110
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.1% +2.8% -1.2%
Institutions buying 1,432 1,417 51
Institutions selling 646 1,333 35
Buyers to sellers 2.22 1.06 1.46

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MRVLQCOMWRD
MRVL 1.00 0.44 0.33
QCOM 0.44 1.00 0.26
WRD 0.33 0.26 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MRVL, QCOM and WRD?

Marvell Technology (MRVL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Marvell Technology (MRVL) $220.67B, Qualcomm (QCOM) $193.40B, WeRide (WRD) $1.40B.

Which stock is cheaper, MRVL, QCOM and WRD?

Qualcomm (QCOM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Marvell Technology (MRVL) 85.5x, Qualcomm (QCOM) 20.9x, WeRide (WRD) -6.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Qualcomm (QCOM) is cheapest (Marvell Technology (MRVL) 61.1x, Qualcomm (QCOM) 17.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

WeRide (WRD) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Marvell Technology (MRVL) +30.6%, Qualcomm (QCOM) +1.9%, WeRide (WRD) +244.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Marvell Technology (MRVL) has the highest net margin (Marvell Technology (MRVL) 27.9%, Qualcomm (QCOM) 21.0%, WeRide (WRD) -243.6%). On return on invested capital, Qualcomm (QCOM) leads (Marvell Technology (MRVL) 5.8%, Qualcomm (QCOM) 20.5%, WeRide (WRD) -24.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Marvell Technology (MRVL) returned the most: Marvell Technology (MRVL) +184.5%, Qualcomm (QCOM) +1.1%, WeRide (WRD) -61.4%. Over five years, Marvell Technology (MRVL) compounded fastest (Marvell Technology (MRVL) +29.7%/yr, Qualcomm (QCOM) +6.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Qualcomm (QCOM) has the highest dividend yield: Marvell Technology (MRVL) 0.10%, Qualcomm (QCOM) 1.98%. WeRide (WRD) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Qualcomm (QCOM) has been the steadiest (Marvell Technology (MRVL) 79.1%, Qualcomm (QCOM) 52.9%, WeRide (WRD) 60.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MRVL, QCOM and WRD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Marvell Technology (MRVL) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.