MRVL vs ARM vs LSCC Stock Comparison

Marvell Technology, Arm Holdings and Lattice Semiconductor Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc.
$228.51 -12.4% 1M +176.1% 1Y
Market cap
$209.82B
P/E
79.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.45B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Design Technology
4 wins
ARM Arm Holdings Plc /Uk
$210.33 -36.8% 1M +26.2% 1Y
Market cap
$236.92B
P/E
226.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.16B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Design Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Marvell Technology leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Marvell Technology 4, Lattice Semiconductor 3, Arm Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMRVLARMLSCCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $209.82B $236.92B $13.49B ARM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 79.5x 226.9x 371.3x MRVL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 55.5x 101.1x 43.3x LSCC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +30.6% +25.1% +33.3% LSCC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 27.9% 20.2% 5.6% MRVL
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.8% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.4x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +176.1% +26.2% +38.2% MRVL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +28.1%/yr — +7.0%/yr MRVL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 79.1% 78.8% 62.3% LSCC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 50/100 63/100 49/100 ARM

Percentile Scorecard

MRVLARMLSCC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMRVLARMLSCC
Valuation 26 #71 of 95 7 #88 of 95 19 #77 of 95
Growth 90 #10 of 93 88 #12 of 93 40 #56 of 93
Profitability 60 #37 of 91 77 #22 of 91 64 #33 of 91
Financial Health 50 #52 of 102 78 #23 of 102 61 #40 of 102
Shareholder Returns 25 #57 of 76 – 60 #31 of 76
Overall 50 63 49
  • MRVL ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors
  • ARM ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors
  • LSCC ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMRVLARMLSCCSPY
1 month -12.4%-36.8%-20.9% -1.0%
3 months +17.6%-19.1%-25.1% +2.9%
6 months +39.1%-10.4%-21.7% +6.4%
Year to date +168.9%+92.4%+30.7% +11.4%
1 year +176.1%+26.2%+38.2% +13.1%
3 years +361.7%+301.6%+32.1% +79.4%
3 years, per year +66.6%+59.0%+9.7% +21.5%
5 years +244.6%—+40.3% +67.7%
5 years, per year +28.1%—+7.0% +10.9%
10 years +1,671.4%—+1,396.0% +255.2%
10 years, per year +33.3%—+31.1% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureMRVLARMLSCCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 79.1%78.8%62.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 74.9%71.2%62.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.233.453.06 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.230.330.61 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -62.1%-54.0%-61.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -27.8%-52.1%-38.0% -2.5%
52-week high $316.43$439.46$155.27 $779.14
52-week low $73.73$104.55$61.73 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMRVLARMLSCC
P/E now vs peer median 77.7xmedian 41.5x 213.8xmedian 41.5x 362.9xmedian 41.5x
P/S now vs peer median 21.2xmedian 6.9x 43.3xmedian 6.9x 20.3xmedian 6.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 71.4xmedian 27.3x 189.4xmedian 27.3x 153.4xmedian 27.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 115.8xmedian 35.6x 110.9xmedian 35.6x 66.3xmedian 35.6x
P/B now vs peer median 10.8xmedian 4.2x 25.9xmedian 4.2x 16.8xmedian 4.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.75median 2.31 6.03median 2.31 -8.27median 2.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMRVLARMLSCC
Revenue $9.45B $5.16B $651.12M
Gross profit $4.93B $5.03B $449.43M
Operating income $1.56B $877.00M $47.97M
Net income $2.64B $1.04B $36.33M
Free cash flow $1.73B $2.01B $199.01M
R&D $2.44B $2.96B $218.13M
EPS (diluted) $2.87 $0.98 $0.26
Cash & equivalents $3.93B $3.06B $173.31M
Total debt $4.96B – –
Shares (diluted) 921.20M 1.07B 140.23M
Enterprise value $196.69B $222.63B $12.92B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMRVLARMLSCC
P/E 77.7x 213.8x 362.9x
P/FCF 115.8x 110.9x 66.3x
P/Operating cash flow 91.1x 106.6x 54.3x
P/S 21.2x 43.3x 20.3x
P/B 10.8x 25.9x 16.8x
P/Tangible book 12.4x 26.5x 17.2x
EV/EBITDA 71.4x 189.4x 153.4x
EV/EBIT 129.0x 250.0x 271.5x
EV/Revenue 21.3x 42.5x 20.0x
EV/FCF 116.4x 109.0x 65.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 91.5x 104.7x 53.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.75 6.03 -8.27

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMRVLARMLSCC
Revenue growth (1Y) 30.6% 25.1% 33.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 18.9% 24.7% -3.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 52.8% 25.6% 37.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 25.0% 25.4% -3.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 1,577% 14.9% 585.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 100.2% 21.6% -39.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 2,653% 49.4% 14.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 107.8% 37.2% -43.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 2,512% 48.7% 12.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 104.2% 35.5% -43.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 19.3% 105.5% 52.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 26.6% 34.7% -2.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 12.8% 121.8% 48.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 30.6% 33.3% -5.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMRVLARMLSCC
Gross margin 52.2% 97.5% 69.0%
EBITDA margin 29.9% 22.5% 13.0%
Operating margin 16.5% 17.0% 7.4%
Pretax margin 32.4% 24.5% 6.9%
Net margin 27.9% 20.2% 5.6%
FCF margin 18.3% 39.0% 30.6%
Operating cash flow margin 23.3% 40.6% 37.4%
Return on equity 14.4% 16.3% 4.8%
Return on assets 9.7% 12.6% 3.9%
Return on invested capital 5.8% – –
Return on capital employed 6.3% 9.0% 6.1%
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.5x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x 2.0x 6.7x
Stock comp / revenue 8.8% 22.4% 18.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMRVLARMLSCC
Debt / assets 18.0% – –
Debt / equity 0.3x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.4x – –
Debt / FCF 2.9x – –
Liabilities / assets 32.7% 22.9% 19.3%
Equity / assets 67.3% 77.1% 80.7%
Interest coverage 7.2x – –
Current ratio 3.2x 5.3x 3.0x
Quick ratio 2.5x 4.9x 2.0x
Cash ratio 1.6x 3.2x 1.2x
Altman Z-score 14.17 54.04 43.52

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMRVLARMLSCC
Dividend yield 0.1% – –
Net buyback yield -0.1% – 0.3%
Shareholder yield 0.0% – 0.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMRVLARMLSCC
Forward P/E 55.5xFY2026 101.1xFY2026 43.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.12FY2026 $2.08FY2026 $2.22FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +45.1%FY2026 +17.5%FY2026 +111.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +83.5% +51.0% +41.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $11.42BFY2026 $5.70BFY2026 $859.93MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +39.5%FY2026 +15.8%FY2026 +64.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +80.2% +38.5% +46.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMRVLARMLSCC
Held by institutions 78.7% 9.3% 100.0%
Institutions holding 2,214 955 604
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.1% +12.4% -0.5%
Institutions buying 1,430 593 354
Institutions selling 646 257 181
Buyers to sellers 2.21 2.31 1.96

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MRVLARMLSCC
MRVL 1.00 0.61 0.60
ARM 0.61 1.00 0.58
LSCC 0.60 0.58 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MRVL, ARM and LSCC?

Arm Holdings (ARM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Marvell Technology (MRVL) $209.82B, Arm Holdings (ARM) $236.92B, Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) $13.49B.

Which stock is cheaper, MRVL, ARM and LSCC?

Marvell Technology (MRVL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Marvell Technology (MRVL) 79.5x, Arm Holdings (ARM) 226.9x, Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) 371.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) is cheapest (Marvell Technology (MRVL) 55.5x, Arm Holdings (ARM) 101.1x, Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) 43.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Marvell Technology (MRVL) +30.6%, Arm Holdings (ARM) +25.1%, Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) +33.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Marvell Technology (MRVL) has the highest net margin (Marvell Technology (MRVL) 27.9%, Arm Holdings (ARM) 20.2%, Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) 5.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Marvell Technology (MRVL) returned the most: Marvell Technology (MRVL) +176.1%, Arm Holdings (ARM) +26.2%, Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) +38.2%. Over five years, Marvell Technology (MRVL) compounded fastest (Marvell Technology (MRVL) +28.1%/yr, Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) +7.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) has been the steadiest (Marvell Technology (MRVL) 79.1%, Arm Holdings (ARM) 78.8%, Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) 62.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MRVL, ARM and LSCC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Marvell Technology (MRVL) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.