MRSH vs NP vs YMM Stock Comparison

Marsh & Mclennan Companies, Neptune Insurance Holdings and Full Truck Alliance Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Full Truck Alliance leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Full Truck Alliance 4, Neptune Insurance Holdings 4, Marsh & Mclennan Companies 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMRSHNPYMMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $90.57B $4.05B $8.76B MRSH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 22.5x 90.5x 14.4x YMM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 18.7x 50.8x 11.2x YMM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.6% +33.8% — NP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 14.2% 22.7% — NP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 13.1% 512.4% — NP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.7x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.98% 0.00% 2.85% YMM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +1.6% +15.6% -36.8% NP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +2.6%/yr — -10.6%/yr MRSH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 26.0% 60.7% 36.3% MRSH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 36/100 39/100 74/100 YMM

Percentile Scorecard

MRSHNPYMM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMRSHNPYMM
Valuation 10 #107 of 119 3 #116 of 119 84 #28 of 167
Growth 17 #95 of 114 79 #25 of 114 76 #38 of 153
Profitability 73 #30 of 110 100 #1 of 110 69 #48 of 153
Financial Health 20 #88 of 110 10 #99 of 110 94 #11 of 179
Shareholder Returns 59 #44 of 106 4 #102 of 106 50 #48 of 94
Overall 36 39 74
  • MRSH ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • NP ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • YMM ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMRSHNPYMMSPY
1 month +11.4%+7.0%+3.6% -0.2%
3 months -0.8%-7.4%-9.6% +3.9%
6 months +11.6%+10.7%-2.8% +8.2%
Year to date +2.8%+1.1%-21.6% +12.9%
1 year +1.6%+15.6%-36.8% +12.3%
3 years +3.1%—+16.2% +87.4%
3 years, per year +1.0%—+5.1% +23.3%
5 years +13.9%—-42.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year +2.6%—-10.6% +10.9%
10 years +201.8%—— +261.1%
10 years, per year +11.7%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMRSHNPYMMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 26.0%60.7%36.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.9%56.0%40.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.390.121.13 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.060.26-1.01 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -35.6%-43.8%-71.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -4.3%-15.9%-36.8% -1.2%
52-week high $199.34$35.05$13.30 $779.14
52-week low $157.32$17.14$7.54 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMRSHNPYMM
P/E now vs peer median 22.5xmedian 10.5x 90.5xmedian 10.5x 14.4xmedian 17.3x
P/S now vs peer median 3.2xmedian 1.4x 20.5xmedian 1.4x —median 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.6xmedian 7.6x —median 7.6x —median 14.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 21.8xmedian 8.5x 49.3xmedian 8.5x 8.7xmedian 11.5x
P/B now vs peer median 6.1xmedian 1.5x -19.1xmedian 1.5x 1.5xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 3.35median 0.53 —median 0.53 0.36median 0.40

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMRSHNPYMM
Revenue $28.46B $197.00M –
Operating income $6.09B $81.30M $620.89M
Net income $4.12B $44.74M $671.27M
Free cash flow $4.15B $82.04M $1.00B
R&D – – $145.15M
EPS (diluted) $8.44 $0.31 $0.58
Cash & equivalents $1.84B $17.43M $1.00B
Total debt $20.53B $922.00M –
Shares (diluted) 479.00M 146.39M 1.05B
Enterprise value $82.96B $3.99B -$1.94B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMRSHNPYMM
P/E 22.5x 90.5x 14.4x
P/FCF 21.8x 49.3x 8.7x
P/Operating cash flow 20.2x 49.3x 9.1x
P/S 3.2x 20.5x –
P/B 6.1x -19.1x 1.5x
P/Tangible book 8.7x -19.1x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA 15.6x – –
EV/EBIT 17.9x 52.2x 8.5x
EV/Revenue 3.8x 21.5x –
EV/FCF 26.3x 51.7x 5.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 24.4x 51.7x 5.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.35 – 0.36

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMRSHNPYMM
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.6% 33.8% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 8.6% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -1.0% 7.0% 13.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 7.8% – 90.8%
Net income growth (1Y) -1.9% 0.1% 21.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 5.5% – 59.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 1.0% 197.9% 4.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 6.7% – 40.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -12.1% 53.1% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 4.0% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -13.9% 53.1% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.1% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMRSHNPYMM
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 24.6% – –
Operating margin 21.4% 41.3% –
Pretax margin 18.9% 34.1% –
Net margin 14.2% 22.7% –
FCF margin 14.6% 41.6% –
Operating cash flow margin 15.7% 41.6% –
Return on equity 27.2% – 10.3%
Return on assets 6.9% 43.4% 9.3%
Return on invested capital 13.1% 512.4% –
Return on capital employed 16.2% 3,191% 10.2%
Asset turnover 0.5x 1.9x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 1.8x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 1.5% 16.2% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMRSHNPYMM
Debt / assets 34.3% 206.9% –
Debt / equity 1.4x -1.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.7x – –
Debt / FCF 4.9x 2.6x –
Liabilities / assets 75.1% 303.6% 10.4%
Equity / assets 24.9% -203.6% 89.6%
Interest coverage 6.3x 5.4x –
Current ratio 1.1x 0.9x 8.0x
Quick ratio 0.5x 0.3x 6.6x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.2x 6.6x
Altman Z-score 2.74 5.68 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMRSHNPYMM
Dividend yield 2.0% – 2.9%
Net buyback yield 3.2% 0.0% –
Shareholder yield 5.2% 0.0% 2.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) 43.6% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 43.3% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 8.4% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 13.1% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMRSHNPYMM
Forward P/E 18.7xFY2026 50.8xFY2026 11.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $10.21FY2026 $0.58FY2026 $0.75FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +4.7%FY2026 +41.5%FY2026 +15.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +15.4% +25.9% +6.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $30.28BFY2026 $195.39MFY2026 $1.97BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +12.2%FY2026 +22.5%FY2026 +10.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +6.4% +18.6% -4.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMRSHNPYMM
Held by institutions 93.9% 71.7% 71.1%
Institutions holding 1,497 136 247
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.8% +3.3% +3.0%
Institutions buying 625 105 168
Institutions selling 652 24 58
Buyers to sellers 0.96 4.38 2.90

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MRSHNPYMM
MRSH 1.00 0.28 0.05
NP 0.28 1.00 0.09
YMM 0.05 0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MRSH, NP and YMM?

Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) $90.57B, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) $4.05B, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) $8.76B.

Which stock is cheaper, MRSH, NP and YMM?

Full Truck Alliance (YMM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 22.5x, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) 90.5x, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) 14.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) is cheapest (Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 18.7x, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) 50.8x, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) 11.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) +7.6%, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) +33.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) has the highest net margin (Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 14.2%, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) 22.7%). On return on invested capital, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) leads (Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 13.1%, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) 512.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) returned the most: Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) +1.6%, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) +15.6%, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) -36.8%. Over five years, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) compounded fastest (Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) +2.6%/yr, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) -10.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Full Truck Alliance (YMM) has the highest dividend yield: Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 1.98%, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) 0.00%, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) 2.85%. Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) has been the steadiest (Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 26.0%, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) 60.7%, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) 36.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MRSH, NP and YMM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.