MRP vs NTPIF vs STRS Stock Comparison

Millrose Properties, Nam Tai Property and Stratus Properties Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MRP Millrose Properties, Inc.
$24.32 -10.6% 1M -26.1% 1Y
Market cap
$4.17B
P/E
8.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$792.29M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
3 wins
NTPIF Nam Tai Property Inc.
$4.40 -1.8% 1M +2.3% 1Y
Market cap
$266.41M
P/E
2,419x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
1 win
STRS Stratus Properties Inc
$17.61 -4.0% 1M -9.7% 1Y
Market cap
$138.94M
P/E
6.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$28.66M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
2 wins

Head to Head

6 decided of 12

Millrose Properties leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Millrose Properties 3, Stratus Properties 2, Nam Tai Property 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMRPNTPIFSTRSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.17B $266.41M $138.94M MRP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 8.3x 2,419x 6.5x STRS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 7.5x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — -12.4% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — 75.0% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 4.4% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 1.8x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -26.1% +2.3% -9.7% NTPIF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -29.6%/yr -12.5%/yr STRS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.7% 36.7% 41.0% MRP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 69/100 — 53/100 MRP

Percentile Scorecard

MRPNTPIFSTRS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMRPNTPIFSTRS
Valuation 74 #11 of 39 16 #33 of 39 47 #21 of 39
Growth – – 42 #19 of 32
Profitability – – 36 #19 of 29
Financial Health 32 #26 of 38 30 #27 of 38 70 #12 of 38
Shareholder Returns 100 #1 of 14 – 69 #5 of 14
Overall 69 – 53
  • MRP ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • NTPIF ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • STRS ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMRPNTPIFSTRSSPY
1 month -10.6%-1.8%-4.0% -0.2%
3 months -15.0%-7.2%-10.1% +3.9%
6 months -20.8%-12.0%-41.3% +8.2%
Year to date -18.6%+2.3%-27.2% +12.9%
1 year -26.1%+2.3%-9.7% +12.3%
3 years —+7.1%-29.6% +87.4%
3 years, per year —+2.3%-11.0% +23.3%
5 years —-82.7%-48.6% +67.9%
5 years, per year —-29.6%-12.5% +10.9%
10 years —-42.9%-26.8% +261.1%
10 years, per year —-5.5%-3.1% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMRPNTPIFSTRSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.7%36.7%41.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.6%49.8%43.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.73-0.050.35 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.820.06-0.24 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -40.3%-96.2%-66.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -26.1%-24.8%-45.5% -1.2%
52-week high $32.90$5.85$32.34 $779.14
52-week low $21.21$3.85$17.61 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMRPNTPIFSTRS
P/E now vs peer median 8.1xmedian 7.9x 2,419xmedian 7.9x 6.5xmedian 7.9x
P/S now vs peer median 4.7xmedian 4.7x 5.6xmedian 4.7x 4.9xmedian 4.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 11.2x —median 11.2x 5.5xmedian 11.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 6.2x -11.1xmedian 6.2x -3.9xmedian 6.2x
P/B now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 0.6x 1.5xmedian 0.6x 0.4xmedian 0.6x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.32 —median 0.32 -0.18median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMRPNTPIFSTRS
Revenue $792.29M – $28.66M
Gross profit – – -$9.32M
Operating income $674.91M – $29.79M
Net income – – $20.07M
Free cash flow – – -$35.66M
EPS (diluted) $3.02 – $2.67
Cash & equivalents $64.54M $43.50M $73.54M
Total debt $3.13B $629.83M $143.76M
Shares (diluted) 166.06M 60.90M 8.06M
Enterprise value $4.17B $85.03M -$123.32M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMRPNTPIFSTRS
P/E 8.1x 2,419x 6.5x
P/FCF 1.1x -11.1x -3.9x
P/Operating cash flow – – -4.4x
P/S 4.7x 5.6x 4.9x
P/B 0.6x 1.5x 0.4x
P/Tangible book 0.6x 1.5x 0.4x
EV/EBITDA – – 5.5x
EV/EBIT – – 7.1x
EV/Revenue 8.7x – 7.4x
EV/FCF – – -5.9x
EV/Operating cash flow – – -6.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – -0.18

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMRPNTPIFSTRS
Revenue growth (1Y) – – -12.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – -10.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – -384.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – -57.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 160.1% – 415.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 58.8%
Net income growth (1Y) – – 314.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – -37.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 131.1% – 491.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – -35.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – -23.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 16.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – 30.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 30.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMRPNTPIFSTRS
Gross margin – – -32.5%
EBITDA margin – – 133.0%
Operating margin – – 103.9%
Pretax margin – – 95.7%
Net margin – – 75.0%
FCF margin – – -124.4%
Operating cash flow margin – – -111.6%
Return on equity – – 5.8%
Return on assets – – 3.7%
Return on invested capital – – 4.4%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.1x – 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – -1.6x
Stock comp / revenue – – 8.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMRPNTPIFSTRS
Debt / assets – 36.0% 27.0%
Debt / equity 0.5x 0.9x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 1.8x
Debt / FCF – – -4.0x
Liabilities / assets 44.6% 61.6% 34.2%
Equity / assets 55.4% 38.4% 65.8%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio – 1.2x –
Quick ratio – 0.7x –
Cash ratio – 0.7x –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMRPNTPIFSTRS
Dividend yield 12.6% – –
Net buyback yield – – 2.3%
Shareholder yield 12.6% 0.0% 2.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMRPNTPIFSTRS
Forward P/E 7.5xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $3.26FY2026 – –
EPS growth, next FY +33.6%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after -7.1% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $840.33MFY2026 – –
Revenue growth, next FY +39.9%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after +11.7% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMRPNTPIFSTRS
Held by institutions 89.6% 9.7% 49.1%
Institutions holding 523 2 55
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.8% – -6.5%
Institutions buying 280 0 26
Institutions selling 136 0 17
Buyers to sellers 2.06 – 1.53

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MRPNTPIFSTRS
MRP 1.00 0.02 0.09
NTPIF 0.02 1.00 -0.03
STRS 0.09 -0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MRP, NTPIF and STRS?

Millrose Properties (MRP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Millrose Properties (MRP) $4.17B, Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) $266.41M, Stratus Properties (STRS) $138.94M.

Which stock is cheaper, MRP, NTPIF and STRS?

Stratus Properties (STRS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Millrose Properties (MRP) 8.3x, Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) 2,419x, Stratus Properties (STRS) 6.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) returned the most: Millrose Properties (MRP) -26.1%, Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) +2.3%, Stratus Properties (STRS) -9.7%. Over five years, Stratus Properties (STRS) compounded fastest (Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) -29.6%/yr, Stratus Properties (STRS) -12.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Millrose Properties (MRP) has been the steadiest (Millrose Properties (MRP) 31.7%, Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) 36.7%, Stratus Properties (STRS) 41.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MRP, NTPIF and STRS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Millrose Properties (MRP) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.