MOB vs VHUB vs CW Stock Comparison

Mobilicom, VenHub Global and Curtiss Wright Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MOB Mobilicom Ltd
$3.29 -31.5% 1M
Market cap
$5.50B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Defense Industrials
CW Curtiss Wright Corp
$477.08 -11.6% 1M -16.8% 1Y
Market cap
$17.62B
P/E
32.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.65B
Div. yield
0.21%
Defense Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

4 decided of 12

Curtiss Wright leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Curtiss Wright 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMOBVHUBCWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.50B $26.21M $17.62B CW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — -0.4x 32.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 33.2x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — +10.5% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -11,799.2% 14.8% CW
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 14.7% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 0.6x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 0.21% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months — — -16.8% –
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — +29.9%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 94.6% 162.6% 35.9% CW
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 2/100 68/100 CW

Percentile Scorecard

MOBVHUBCW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMOBVHUBCW
Valuation – 0 #13 of 13 52 #49 of 100
Growth – 9 #11 of 12 60 #39 of 97
Profitability – 0 #12 of 12 95 #6 of 96
Financial Health 85 #17 of 105 0 #13 of 13 66 #36 of 105
Shareholder Returns – – 67 #22 of 65
Overall – 2 68
  • MOB ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • VHUB ranked among 14 companies in Robotics and Automation
  • CW ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMOBVHUBCWSPY
1 month -31.5%-46.3%-11.6% -0.2%
3 months -30.1%-60.8%-34.5% +3.9%
6 months -50.7%-56.1%-32.4% +8.2%
Year to date -46.1%—-13.5% +12.9%
1 year ——-16.8% +12.3%
3 years ——+143.8% +87.4%
3 years, per year ——+34.6% +23.3%
5 years ——+269.8% +67.9%
5 years, per year ——+29.9% +10.9%
10 years ——+438.6% +261.1%
10 years, per year ——+18.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMOBVHUBCWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 94.6%162.6%35.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 94.0%198.1%38.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.531.611.41 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y ——-0.47 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.9%-96.4%-41.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -64.5%-96.4%-39.8% -1.2%
52-week high $9.26$8.08$792.61 $779.14
52-week low $2.97$0.29$464.99 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMOBVHUBCW
P/E now vs peer median —median 26.5x -0.4x 32.6xmedian 26.5x
P/S now vs peer median —median 3.0x 51.9xmedian 18.7x 4.8xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.6x -0.6x 22.5xmedian 14.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 26.4x -1.6xmedian 14.5x 28.2xmedian 26.4x
P/B now vs peer median 481.3xmedian 2.5x -495.8xmedian 1.1x 6.4xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.90 — 1.58median 0.90

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMOBVHUBCW
Revenue – $505.29K $3.65B
Gross profit – -$111.65K $1.38B
Operating income – -$42.78M $686.21M
Net income – -$59.62M $541.18M
Free cash flow – -$16.53M $625.29M
R&D – $1.05M $98.16M
EPS (diluted) – $-0.69 $14.58
Cash & equivalents $15.20M $2.56M $477.15M
Total debt – – $957.39M
Shares (diluted) 1.67B 86.30M 37.12M
Enterprise value $5.45B $17.76M $16.20B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMOBVHUBCW
P/E – -0.4x 32.6x
P/FCF – -1.6x 28.2x
P/Operating cash flow – -1.7x 24.4x
P/S – 51.9x 4.8x
P/B 481.3x -495.8x 6.4x
P/Tangible book 481.3x -495.8x 7.8x
EV/EBITDA – -0.6x 22.5x
EV/EBIT – -0.6x 26.4x
EV/Revenue – 46.8x 5.0x
EV/FCF – -1.4x 28.9x
EV/Operating cash flow – -1.5x 25.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – 1.58

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMOBVHUBCW
Revenue growth (1Y) – – 10.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 10.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 11.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 11.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -193.6% 17.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 14.6%
Net income growth (1Y) – -76.7% 19.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – 19.1%
EPS growth (1Y) – 42.3% 22.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – 20.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – 25.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 21.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – 24.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 19.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMOBVHUBCW
Gross margin – -22.1% 37.7%
EBITDA margin – -8,423% 22.0%
Operating margin – -8,466% 18.8%
Pretax margin – -10,867% 18.9%
Net margin – -11,799% 14.8%
FCF margin – -3,271% 17.1%
Operating cash flow margin – -3,074% 19.7%
Return on equity – -3,339% 20.0%
Return on assets – -559.7% 10.1%
Return on invested capital – – 14.7%
Return on capital employed – -1,898% 17.3%
Asset turnover – 0.1x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.3x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 6,401% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMOBVHUBCW
Debt / assets – – 17.5%
Debt / equity – – 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 0.6x
Debt / FCF – – 1.5x
Liabilities / assets 38.5% 100.7% 49.2%
Equity / assets 61.5% -0.7% 50.8%
Interest coverage – -3.5x 16.2x
Current ratio 10.8x 0.8x 1.6x
Quick ratio 630,161x 0.3x 1.4x
Cash ratio 9.1x 0.3x 0.3x
Altman Z-score – -34.51 6.38

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMOBVHUBCW
Dividend yield – – 0.2%
Net buyback yield – -72.0% 2.5%
Shareholder yield – -72.0% 2.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMOBVHUBCW
Forward P/E – – 33.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – – $14.35FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +8.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +11.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year – – $4.03BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – +15.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – -3.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMOBVHUBCW
Held by institutions – – 85.6%
Institutions holding – – 946
Change in shares held, QoQ – – +2.8%
Institutions buying – – 479
Institutions selling – – 313
Buyers to sellers – – 1.53

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MOBVHUBCW
MOB 1.00 -0.01 0.19
VHUB -0.01 1.00 -0.05
CW 0.19 -0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MOB, VHUB and CW?

Curtiss Wright (CW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Mobilicom (MOB) $5.50B, VenHub Global (VHUB) $26.21M, Curtiss Wright (CW) $17.62B.

Which company is more profitable?

Curtiss Wright (CW) has the highest net margin (VenHub Global (VHUB) -11,799.2%, Curtiss Wright (CW) 14.8%).

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Curtiss Wright (CW) 0.21%. Mobilicom (MOB) and VenHub Global (VHUB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Curtiss Wright (CW) has been the steadiest (Mobilicom (MOB) 94.6%, VenHub Global (VHUB) 162.6%, Curtiss Wright (CW) 35.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MOB, VHUB and CW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Curtiss Wright (CW) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.