MOB vs NOC vs VHUB Stock Comparison

Mobilicom, Northrop Grumman and VenHub Global Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MOB Mobilicom Ltd
$3.29 -31.5% 1M
Market cap
$5.50B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Defense Industrials

Head to Head

4 decided of 12

Northrop Grumman leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Northrop Grumman 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMOBNOCVHUBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.50B $78.32B $26.21M NOC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 17.3x -0.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 17.9x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +6.5% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 10.4% -11,799.2% NOC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 12.2% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.7x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 1.73% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months — -7.5% — –
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +9.0%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 94.6% 28.7% 162.6% NOC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 58/100 2/100 NOC

Percentile Scorecard

MOBNOCVHUB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMOBNOCVHUB
Valuation – 78 #23 of 100 0 #13 of 13
Growth – 38 #61 of 97 9 #11 of 12
Profitability – 78 #22 of 96 0 #12 of 12
Financial Health 85 #17 of 105 40 #63 of 105 0 #13 of 13
Shareholder Returns – 58 #28 of 65 –
Overall – 58 2
  • MOB ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • NOC ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • VHUB ranked among 14 companies in Robotics and Automation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMOBNOCVHUBSPY
1 month -31.5%+8.0%-46.3% -0.2%
3 months -30.1%+0.4%-60.8% +3.9%
6 months -50.7%-4.6%-56.1% +8.2%
Year to date -46.1%-3.3%— +12.9%
1 year —-7.5%— +12.3%
3 years —+16.5%— +87.4%
3 years, per year —+5.2%— +23.3%
5 years —+53.7%— +67.9%
5 years, per year —+9.0%— +10.9%
10 years —+144.6%— +261.1%
10 years, per year —+9.4%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMOBNOCVHUBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 94.6%28.7%162.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 94.0%28.4%198.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.53-0.011.61 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y —-0.26— 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.9%-38.4%-96.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -64.5%-28.2%-96.4% -1.2%
52-week high $9.26$768.02$8.08 $779.14
52-week low $2.97$473.40$0.29 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMOBNOCVHUB
P/E now vs peer median —median 26.5x 17.3xmedian 26.5x -0.4x
P/S now vs peer median —median 3.0x 1.8xmedian 3.0x 51.9xmedian 18.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.6x 14.5xmedian 14.6x -0.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 26.4x 20.5xmedian 26.4x -1.6xmedian 14.5x
P/B now vs peer median 481.3xmedian 2.5x 4.2xmedian 2.5x -495.8xmedian 1.1x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.90 17.01median 0.90 —

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMOBNOCVHUB
Revenue – $43.59B $505.29K
Gross profit – $8.73B -$111.65K
Operating income – $4.63B -$42.78M
Net income – $4.52B -$59.62M
Free cash flow – $3.83B -$16.53M
R&D – – $1.05M
EPS (diluted) – $31.74 $-0.69
Cash & equivalents $15.20M $3.74B $2.56M
Total debt – $58.43B –
Shares (diluted) 1.67B 142.40M 86.30M
Enterprise value $5.45B $65.77B $17.76M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMOBNOCVHUB
P/E – 17.3x -0.4x
P/FCF – 20.5x -1.6x
P/Operating cash flow – 14.9x -1.7x
P/S – 1.8x 51.9x
P/B 481.3x 4.2x -495.8x
P/Tangible book 481.3x 4.2x -495.8x
EV/EBITDA – 14.5x -0.6x
EV/EBIT – 19.2x -0.6x
EV/Revenue – 2.0x 46.8x
EV/FCF – 23.2x -1.4x
EV/Operating cash flow – 16.9x -1.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 17.01 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMOBNOCVHUB
Revenue growth (1Y) – 6.5% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 4.1% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 9.8% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 3.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 6.8% -193.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 6.4% –
Net income growth (1Y) – 12.5% -76.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -1.1% –
EPS growth (1Y) – 13.3% 42.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 1.0% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 53.2% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 12.5% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 108.8% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 22.3% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMOBNOCVHUB
Gross margin – 20.0% -22.1%
EBITDA margin – 14.1% -8,423%
Operating margin – 10.6% -8,466%
Pretax margin – 12.0% -10,867%
Net margin – 10.4% -11,799%
FCF margin – 8.8% -3,271%
Operating cash flow margin – 12.1% -3,074%
Return on equity – 24.7% -3,339%
Return on assets – 8.8% -559.7%
Return on invested capital – 12.2% –
Return on capital employed – 12.2% -1,898%
Asset turnover – 0.8x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.2x 0.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.3% 6,401%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMOBNOCVHUB
Debt / assets – 27.5% –
Debt / equity – 0.8x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.7x –
Debt / FCF – 3.8x –
Liabilities / assets 38.5% 64.4% 100.7%
Equity / assets 61.5% 35.6% -0.7%
Interest coverage – 7.1x -3.5x
Current ratio 10.8x 1.2x 0.8x
Quick ratio 630,161x 1.0x 0.3x
Cash ratio 9.1x 0.3x 0.3x
Altman Z-score – 3.08 -34.51

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMOBNOCVHUB
Dividend yield – 1.7% –
Net buyback yield – 0.7% -72.0%
Shareholder yield – 2.4% -72.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 30.2% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 35.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 8.0% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 7.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMOBNOCVHUB
Forward P/E – 17.9xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $30.81FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – +17.0%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +3.7% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $42.95BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – +2.4%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +3.7% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMOBNOCVHUB
Held by institutions – 83.4% –
Institutions holding – 1,809 –
Change in shares held, QoQ – +0.3% –
Institutions buying – 840 –
Institutions selling – 639 –
Buyers to sellers – 1.31 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MOBNOCVHUB
MOB 1.00 -0.03 -0.01
NOC -0.03 1.00 -0.07
VHUB -0.01 -0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MOB, NOC and VHUB?

Northrop Grumman (NOC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Mobilicom (MOB) $5.50B, Northrop Grumman (NOC) $78.32B, VenHub Global (VHUB) $26.21M.

Which company is more profitable?

Northrop Grumman (NOC) has the highest net margin (Northrop Grumman (NOC) 10.4%, VenHub Global (VHUB) -11,799.2%).

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Northrop Grumman (NOC) 1.73%. Mobilicom (MOB) and VenHub Global (VHUB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Northrop Grumman (NOC) has been the steadiest (Mobilicom (MOB) 94.6%, Northrop Grumman (NOC) 28.7%, VenHub Global (VHUB) 162.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MOB, NOC and VHUB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Northrop Grumman (NOC) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.