MOB vs NGTF vs LMT Stock Comparison

Mobilicom, NightFood Holdings and Lockheed Martin Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MOB Mobilicom Ltd
$3.21 -33.1% 1M
Market cap
$5.50B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Defense Industrials
LMT Lockheed Martin Corp
$635.32 +22.3% 1M +30.9% 1Y
Market cap
$143.69B
P/E
22.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$79.12B
Div. yield
0.02%
Defense Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Lockheed Martin leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Lockheed Martin 4, NightFood Holdings 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMOBNGTFLMTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.50B $852.59M $143.69B LMT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — -10.1x 22.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 21.5x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +1,462.5% +7.9% NGTF
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -1,039.0% 8.2% LMT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 26.5% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.4x 1.3x NGTF
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.02% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months — +3,040.0% +30.9% NGTF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +73.5%/yr +13.9%/yr NGTF
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 94.8% 526.8% 30.0% LMT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 26/100 60/100 LMT

Percentile Scorecard

MOBNGTFLMT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMOBNGTFLMT
Valuation – 42 #8 of 13 68 #33 of 100
Growth – 0 #12 of 12 62 #38 of 97
Profitability – 46 #7 of 12 90 #11 of 96
Financial Health 85 #17 of 105 17 #11 of 13 41 #62 of 105
Shareholder Returns – – 40 #39 of 64
Overall – 26 60
  • MOB ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • NGTF ranked among 14 companies in Robotics and Automation
  • LMT ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMOBNGTFLMTSPY
1 month -33.1%+10,366.7%+22.3% -0.8%
3 months -34.4%+10,366.7%+9.5% +3.5%
6 months -50.0%+10,366.7%+23.8% +7.0%
Year to date -47.4%+6,180.0%+31.4% +12.2%
1 year —+3,040.0%+30.9% +13.0%
3 years —+15,600.0%+43.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year —+440.1%+12.7% +23.1%
5 years —+1,470.0%+92.0% +68.6%
5 years, per year —+73.5%+13.9% +11.0%
10 years —+3,040.0%+154.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+41.2%+9.8% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureMOBNGTFLMTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 94.8%526.8%30.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 94.0%438.1%26.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.531.69-0.08 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y —5.771.03 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.9%-95.5%-33.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -65.3%-3.4%-6.1% -1.8%
52-week high $9.26$3.25$676.70 $779.14
52-week low $2.97$0.02$439.19 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMOBNGTFLMT
P/E now vs peer median —median 26.8x -10.1x 22.5xmedian 26.8x
P/S now vs peer median —median 2.9x 104.6xmedian 17.8x 1.9xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 15.2x -12.0x 14.7xmedian 15.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 25.5x -99.6xmedian 14.0x 17.5xmedian 25.5x
P/B now vs peer median 469.6xmedian 2.5x 72.3xmedian 1.0x 14.6xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.94 0.15 64.50median 0.94

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMOBNGTFLMT
Revenue – $8.15M $79.12B
Gross profit – $5.34M $9.28B
Operating income – -$77.62M $9.32B
Net income – -$84.65M $6.51B
Free cash flow – -$8.56M $8.38B
EPS (diluted) – $-0.31 $28.13
Cash & equivalents $15.20M $865.89K $5.96B
Total debt – $136.49M $20.50B
Shares (diluted) 1.67B 271.53M 231.50M
Enterprise value $5.45B $849.30M $127.92B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMOBNGTFLMT
P/E – -10.1x 22.5x
P/FCF – -99.6x 17.5x
P/Operating cash flow – -105.9x 14.5x
P/S – 104.6x 1.9x
P/B 469.6x 72.3x 14.6x
P/Tangible book 469.6x 146.3x 17.6x
EV/EBITDA – -12.0x 14.7x
EV/EBIT – -11.4x 17.3x
EV/Revenue – 108.1x 2.0x
EV/FCF – -102.9x 19.2x
EV/Operating cash flow – -109.4x 16.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.15 64.50

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMOBNGTFLMT
Revenue growth (1Y) – 1,463% 7.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 293.8% 5.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 55.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 3.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -1,607% 52.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -234.8% 3.1%
Net income growth (1Y) – -1,032% 55.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -140.7% -2.2%
EPS growth (1Y) – -398.7% 55.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -65.0% 0.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -786.1% 59.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -88.4% 10.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -808.6% 82.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -92.3% 13.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMOBNGTFLMT
Gross margin – 65.5% 11.7%
EBITDA margin – -901.7% 13.9%
Operating margin – -952.6% 11.8%
Pretax margin – -1,039% 9.7%
Net margin – -1,039% 8.2%
FCF margin – -105.1% 10.6%
Operating cash flow margin – -98.8% 12.8%
Return on equity – -179.3% 69.2%
Return on assets – -87.5% 10.3%
Return on invested capital – – 26.5%
Return on capital employed – -119.7% 23.9%
Asset turnover – 0.1x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.1x 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue – 24.6% 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMOBNGTFLMT
Debt / assets – 45.3% 31.8%
Debt / equity – 2.5x 2.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.4x 1.3x
Debt / FCF – -3.4x 2.4x
Liabilities / assets 38.5% 81.7% 84.4%
Equity / assets 61.5% 18.3% 15.6%
Interest coverage – -12.3x 8.6x
Current ratio 10.8x 0.1x 1.3x
Quick ratio 630,161x 0.0x 1.1x
Cash ratio 9.1x 0.0x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – 2.45 3.81

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMOBNGTFLMT
Dividend yield – – 2.2%
Net buyback yield – 0.0% 0.5%
Shareholder yield – 0.0% 2.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 49.2%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 38.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 1.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 1.6%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMOBNGTFLMT
Forward P/E – – 21.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – – $29.52FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +37.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +7.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year – – $85.91BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – +14.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – +4.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMOBNGTFLMT
Held by institutions – – 75.5%
Institutions holding – – 2,779
Change in shares held, QoQ – – +0.4%
Institutions buying – – 1,336
Institutions selling – – 1,026
Buyers to sellers – – 1.30

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MOBNGTFLMT
MOB 1.00 0.05 0.00
NGTF 0.05 1.00 0.00
LMT 0.00 0.00 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MOB, NGTF and LMT?

Lockheed Martin (LMT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Mobilicom (MOB) $5.50B, NightFood Holdings (NGTF) $852.59M, Lockheed Martin (LMT) $143.69B.

Which company is growing faster?

NightFood Holdings (NGTF) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: NightFood Holdings (NGTF) +1,462.5%, Lockheed Martin (LMT) +7.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lockheed Martin (LMT) has the highest net margin (NightFood Holdings (NGTF) -1,039.0%, Lockheed Martin (LMT) 8.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year NightFood Holdings (NGTF) returned the most: NightFood Holdings (NGTF) +3,040.0%, Lockheed Martin (LMT) +30.9%. Over five years, NightFood Holdings (NGTF) compounded fastest (NightFood Holdings (NGTF) +73.5%/yr, Lockheed Martin (LMT) +13.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Mobilicom (MOB) 0.00%, Lockheed Martin (LMT) 0.02%. Mobilicom (MOB) and NightFood Holdings (NGTF) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Lockheed Martin (LMT) has been the steadiest (Mobilicom (MOB) 94.8%, NightFood Holdings (NGTF) 526.8%, Lockheed Martin (LMT) 30.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MOB, NGTF and LMT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lockheed Martin (LMT) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.