MOB vs KBR vs LMT Stock Comparison

Mobilicom, Kbr and Lockheed Martin Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MOB Mobilicom Ltd
$3.21 -33.1% 1M
Market cap
$5.43B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Defense Industrials
KBR Kbr, Inc.
$40.01 +15.9% 1M -9.2% 1Y
Market cap
$5.07B
P/E
12.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.72B
Div. yield
0.02%
Defense Industrials
2 wins
LMT Lockheed Martin Corp
$635.32 +22.3% 1M +30.9% 1Y
Market cap
$143.91B
P/E
22.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$79.12B
Div. yield
0.02%
Defense Industrials
10 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Lockheed Martin leads on 10 of the 12 questions below (Lockheed Martin 10, Kbr 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMOBKBRLMTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.43B $5.07B $143.91B LMT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 12.0x 22.1x KBR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 9.7x 21.5x KBR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -3.6% +7.9% LMT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 5.5% 8.2% LMT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 13.0% 26.5% LMT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.5x 1.3x LMT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.02% LMT
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months — -9.2% +30.9% LMT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -1.1%/yr +13.9%/yr LMT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 94.8% 33.9% 30.0% LMT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 59/100 60/100 LMT

Percentile Scorecard

MOBKBRLMT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMOBKBRLMT
Valuation – 99 #2 of 100 68 #33 of 100
Growth – 44 #55 of 97 62 #38 of 97
Profitability – 66 #33 of 96 90 #11 of 96
Financial Health 85 #17 of 105 16 #88 of 105 41 #62 of 105
Shareholder Returns – 70 #20 of 64 40 #39 of 64
Overall – 59 60
  • MOB ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • KBR ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • LMT ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMOBKBRLMTSPY
1 month -33.1%+15.9%+22.3% -0.8%
3 months -34.4%+8.7%+9.5% +3.5%
6 months -50.0%+13.4%+23.8% +7.0%
Year to date -47.4%-0.5%+31.4% +12.2%
1 year —-9.2%+30.9% +13.0%
3 years —-30.0%+43.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year —-11.2%+12.7% +23.1%
5 years —-5.3%+92.0% +68.6%
5 years, per year —-1.1%+13.9% +11.0%
10 years —+172.5%+154.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+10.5%+9.8% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureMOBKBRLMTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 94.8%33.9%30.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 94.0%34.1%26.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.530.54-0.08 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y —-0.271.03 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.9%-58.3%-33.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -65.3%-11.0%-6.1% -1.8%
52-week high $9.26$44.98$676.70 $779.14
52-week low $2.97$30.06$439.19 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMOBKBRLMT
P/E now vs peer median —median 26.8x 11.9xmedian 26.8x 22.5xmedian 26.8x
P/S now vs peer median —median 2.9x 0.7xmedian 2.9x 1.9xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 15.2x 8.1xmedian 15.2x 14.7xmedian 15.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 25.5x 14.2xmedian 25.5x 17.5xmedian 25.5x
P/B now vs peer median 469.6xmedian 2.5x 3.1xmedian 2.5x 14.6xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.94 0.14median 0.94 64.50median 0.94

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMOBKBRLMT
Revenue – $7.72B $79.12B
Gross profit – $1.12B $9.28B
Operating income – $734.00M $9.32B
Net income – $429.00M $6.51B
Free cash flow – $355.00M $8.38B
EPS (diluted) – $3.34 $28.13
Cash & equivalents $15.20M $312.00M $5.96B
Total debt – $2.55B $20.50B
Shares (diluted) 1.67B 127.00M 231.50M
Enterprise value $5.38B $3.34B $128.14B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMOBKBRLMT
P/E – 11.9x 22.5x
P/FCF – 14.2x 17.5x
P/Operating cash flow – 12.3x 14.5x
P/S – 0.7x 1.9x
P/B 469.6x 3.1x 14.6x
P/Tangible book 469.6x 5.3x 17.6x
EV/EBITDA – 8.1x 14.7x
EV/EBIT – 9.9x 17.3x
EV/Revenue – 0.9x 2.0x
EV/FCF – 20.5x 19.2x
EV/Operating cash flow – 17.8x 16.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.14 64.50

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMOBKBRLMT
Revenue growth (1Y) – -3.6% 7.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 4.9% 5.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -4.5% 55.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 6.4% 3.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 3.5% 52.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 22.3% 3.1%
Net income growth (1Y) – 16.3% 55.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 86.3% -2.2%
EPS growth (1Y) – 18.0% 55.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 87.6% 0.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -18.5% 59.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -4.5% 10.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -22.5% 82.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -2.2% 13.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMOBKBRLMT
Gross margin – 14.5% 11.7%
EBITDA margin – 11.7% 13.9%
Operating margin – 9.5% 11.8%
Pretax margin – 7.5% 9.7%
Net margin – 5.5% 8.2%
FCF margin – 4.6% 10.6%
Operating cash flow margin – 5.3% 12.8%
Return on equity – 26.6% 69.2%
Return on assets – 6.5% 10.3%
Return on invested capital – 13.0% 26.5%
Return on capital employed – 14.9% 23.9%
Asset turnover – 1.2x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.0x 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMOBKBRLMT
Debt / assets – 38.3% 31.8%
Debt / equity – 1.6x 2.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.5x 1.3x
Debt / FCF – 7.2x 2.4x
Liabilities / assets 38.5% 75.4% 84.4%
Equity / assets 61.5% 24.6% 15.6%
Interest coverage – 5.0x 8.6x
Current ratio 10.8x 1.1x 1.3x
Quick ratio 630,161x 0.8x 1.1x
Cash ratio 9.1x 0.2x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – 2.56 3.81

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMOBKBRLMT
Dividend yield – 1.7% 2.2%
Net buyback yield – 3.1% 0.5%
Shareholder yield – 4.7% 2.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 19.8% 49.2%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 23.9% 38.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 4.9% 1.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 7.2% 1.6%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMOBKBRLMT
Forward P/E – 9.7xFY2026 21.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $4.13FY2026 $29.52FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +5.1%FY2026 +37.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -6.8% +7.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $8.58BFY2026 $85.91BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +10.2%FY2026 +14.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -3.3% +4.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMOBKBRLMT
Held by institutions – 100.0% 75.5%
Institutions holding – 363 2,779
Change in shares held, QoQ – +7.4% +0.4%
Institutions buying – 206 1,336
Institutions selling – 115 1,026
Buyers to sellers – 1.79 1.30

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MOBKBRLMT
MOB 1.00 0.13 0.00
KBR 0.13 1.00 0.36
LMT 0.00 0.36 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MOB, KBR and LMT?

Lockheed Martin (LMT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Mobilicom (MOB) $5.43B, Kbr (KBR) $5.07B, Lockheed Martin (LMT) $143.91B.

Which stock is cheaper, MOB, KBR and LMT?

Kbr (KBR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Kbr (KBR) 12.0x, Lockheed Martin (LMT) 22.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Kbr (KBR) is cheapest (Kbr (KBR) 9.7x, Lockheed Martin (LMT) 21.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Lockheed Martin (LMT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Kbr (KBR) -3.6%, Lockheed Martin (LMT) +7.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lockheed Martin (LMT) has the highest net margin (Kbr (KBR) 5.5%, Lockheed Martin (LMT) 8.2%). On return on invested capital, Lockheed Martin (LMT) leads (Kbr (KBR) 13.0%, Lockheed Martin (LMT) 26.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lockheed Martin (LMT) returned the most: Kbr (KBR) -9.2%, Lockheed Martin (LMT) +30.9%. Over five years, Lockheed Martin (LMT) compounded fastest (Kbr (KBR) -1.1%/yr, Lockheed Martin (LMT) +13.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Lockheed Martin (LMT) has the highest dividend yield: Mobilicom (MOB) 0.00%, Kbr (KBR) 0.02%, Lockheed Martin (LMT) 0.02%. Mobilicom (MOB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Lockheed Martin (LMT) has been the steadiest (Mobilicom (MOB) 94.8%, Kbr (KBR) 33.9%, Lockheed Martin (LMT) 30.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MOB, KBR and LMT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lockheed Martin (LMT) leads on 10. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.