MNTK vs CVE vs PSX Stock Comparison

Montauk Renewables, Cenovus Energy and Phillips 66 Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CVE Cenovus Energy Inc.
$33.18 +7.2% 1M +94.3% 1Y
Market cap
$57.20B
P/E
15.8x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Integrated Oil and Gas Energy
3 wins
PSX Phillips 66
$288.74 +12.9% 1M +113.9% 1Y
Market cap
$107.30B
P/E
15.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$156.36B
Div. yield
0.02%
Integrated Oil and Gas Energy
8 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Phillips 66 leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Phillips 66 8, Cenovus Energy 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMNTKCVEPSXLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $318.00M $57.20B $107.30B PSX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 40.1x 15.8x 15.1x PSX
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 18.0x 7.8x 9.0x CVE
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.3% — +15.5% PSX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.2% — 4.5% PSX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.3% — 14.8% PSX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.9x 0.7x 1.3x CVE
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -7.3% +94.3% +113.9% PSX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -28.4%/yr +23.6%/yr +30.2%/yr PSX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 78.6% 35.9% 32.0% PSX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 51/100 54/100 54/100 CVE

Percentile Scorecard

MNTKCVEPSX

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMNTKCVEPSX
Valuation 70 #4 of 11 45 #55 of 99 46 #54 of 99
Growth 20 #9 of 11 44 #55 of 97 85 #15 of 97
Profitability 75 #3 of 9 92 #9 of 96 48 #50 of 96
Financial Health 40 #7 of 11 58 #43 of 102 49 #53 of 102
Shareholder Returns – 33 #51 of 76 41 #45 of 76
Overall 51 54 54
  • MNTK ranked among 11 companies in Renewable Fuels
  • CVE ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream
  • PSX ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMNTKCVEPSXSPY
1 month -26.3%+7.2%+12.9% -0.8%
3 months +13.7%+18.3%+39.0% +3.5%
6 months +55.4%+23.9%+76.0% +7.0%
Year to date +29.3%+96.1%+123.8% +12.2%
1 year -7.3%+94.3%+113.9% +13.0%
3 years -77.8%+71.5%+160.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year -39.5%+19.7%+37.6% +23.1%
5 years -81.1%+188.3%+273.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year -28.4%+23.6%+30.2% +11.0%
10 years —+119.6%+256.2% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+8.2%+13.5% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureMNTKCVEPSXSPY
Volatility, 1Y 78.6%35.9%32.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 75.0%34.9%29.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.29-0.33-0.34 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.092.633.56 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -94.5%-57.2%-46.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -26.5%-0.8%-2.8% -1.8%
52-week high $2.94$33.46$297.20 $779.14
52-week low $1.12$15.85$127.75 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMNTKCVEPSX
P/E now vs peer median 39.0xmedian 10.9x 16.6xmedian 13.5x 16.3xmedian 13.5x
P/S now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 1.2x 1.8xmedian 2.1x 0.7xmedian 2.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 12.8xmedian 14.0x 7.5xmedian 5.9x 10.3xmedian 5.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median -3.7xmedian 14.0x 10.6xmedian 11.0x 18.0xmedian 11.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 1.2x 2.7xmedian 1.5x 3.5xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median -2.13median 0.19 -1.22median 2.27 -1.67median 2.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMNTKCVEPSX
Revenue $189.10M – $156.36B
Gross profit – – $24.12B
Operating income $1.13M $4.67B $10.04B
Net income $7.93M $3.61B $7.19B
Free cash flow -$83.37M – $6.39B
R&D – $31.67M –
EPS (diluted) $0.06 $1.98 $17.62
Cash & equivalents $15.76M $2.00B $4.10B
Total debt $149.64M $14.38B $20.57B
Shares (diluted) 143.93M 1.82B 402.62M
Enterprise value $245.78M $48.91B $95.09B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMNTKCVEPSX
P/E 39.0x 16.6x 16.3x
P/FCF -3.7x 10.6x 18.0x
P/Operating cash flow 7.1x – 12.9x
P/S 1.6x 1.8x 0.7x
P/B 1.2x 2.7x 3.5x
P/Tangible book 1.3x 2.7x 3.6x
EV/EBITDA 12.8x 7.5x 10.3x
EV/EBIT 394.0x 14.7x 13.1x
EV/Revenue 2.3x – 0.8x
EV/FCF -5.3x – 20.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 10.2x – 14.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.13 -1.22 -1.67

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMNTKCVEPSX
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.3% – 15.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 2.1% – -0.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 53.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – -3.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) -89.7% -10.8% 223.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -62.7% -17.3% -13.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 199.8% 2.5% 293.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -18.0% -16.3% -14.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 197.9% 4.9% 318.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -18.3% -13.6% -9.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -6.9% – 165.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -10.4% – -3.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -312.7% – 329.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -100.9% – -7.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMNTKCVEPSX
Gross margin – – 15.4%
EBITDA margin 18.4% – 8.2%
Operating margin 0.6% – 6.4%
Pretax margin 2.0% – 5.7%
Net margin 4.2% – 4.5%
FCF margin -44.1% – 4.1%
Operating cash flow margin 23.0% – 5.7%
Return on equity 3.0% 16.6% 23.1%
Return on assets 1.7% 8.5% 8.7%
Return on invested capital 0.3% – 14.8%
Return on capital employed 0.3% 12.4% 15.5%
Asset turnover 0.4x – 1.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 5.5x – 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 1.0% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMNTKCVEPSX
Debt / assets 31.8% 17.4% 25.1%
Debt / equity 0.6x 0.3x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.9x 0.7x 1.3x
Debt / FCF -1.8x – 3.2x
Liabilities / assets 43.8% 50.1% 60.0%
Equity / assets 56.2% 49.9% 40.0%
Interest coverage 0.2x – 8.7x
Current ratio 0.6x 1.6x 1.3x
Quick ratio 0.5x 1.0x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.4x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 1.44 – 4.43

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMNTKCVEPSX
Dividend yield – 2.5% 1.7%
Net buyback yield – – 0.9%
Shareholder yield – 2.5% 2.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 27.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 31.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 4.1%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 1.8%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMNTKCVEPSX
Forward P/E 18.0xFY2026 7.8xFY2026 9.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.12FY2026 $4.23FY2026 $32.20FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +1,100.0%FY2026 +169.4%FY2026 +400.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +41.7% -9.5% -1.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $199.18MFY2026 $42.97BFY2026 $165.53BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +12.9%FY2026 +0.6%FY2026 +21.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +28.2% +2.6% -4.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMNTKCVEPSX
Held by institutions 14.9% 48.8% 78.8%
Institutions holding 92 490 2,102
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.2% -5.2% +1.3%
Institutions buying 52 264 967
Institutions selling 26 162 729
Buyers to sellers 2.00 1.63 1.33

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MNTKCVEPSX
MNTK 1.00 0.02 0.07
CVE 0.02 1.00 0.54
PSX 0.07 0.54 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MNTK, CVE and PSX?

Phillips 66 (PSX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Montauk Renewables (MNTK) $318.00M, Cenovus Energy (CVE) $57.20B, Phillips 66 (PSX) $107.30B.

Which stock is cheaper, MNTK, CVE and PSX?

Phillips 66 (PSX) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Montauk Renewables (MNTK) 40.1x, Cenovus Energy (CVE) 15.8x, Phillips 66 (PSX) 15.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Cenovus Energy (CVE) is cheapest (Montauk Renewables (MNTK) 18.0x, Cenovus Energy (CVE) 7.8x, Phillips 66 (PSX) 9.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Phillips 66 (PSX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Montauk Renewables (MNTK) +4.3%, Phillips 66 (PSX) +15.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Phillips 66 (PSX) has the highest net margin (Montauk Renewables (MNTK) 4.2%, Phillips 66 (PSX) 4.5%). On return on invested capital, Phillips 66 (PSX) leads (Montauk Renewables (MNTK) 0.3%, Phillips 66 (PSX) 14.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Phillips 66 (PSX) returned the most: Montauk Renewables (MNTK) -7.3%, Cenovus Energy (CVE) +94.3%, Phillips 66 (PSX) +113.9%. Over five years, Phillips 66 (PSX) compounded fastest (Montauk Renewables (MNTK) -28.4%/yr, Cenovus Energy (CVE) +23.6%/yr, Phillips 66 (PSX) +30.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Montauk Renewables (MNTK) 0.00%, Cenovus Energy (CVE) 0.00%, Phillips 66 (PSX) 0.02%. Montauk Renewables (MNTK) and Cenovus Energy (CVE) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Phillips 66 (PSX) has been the steadiest (Montauk Renewables (MNTK) 78.6%, Cenovus Energy (CVE) 35.9%, Phillips 66 (PSX) 32.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MNTK, CVE and PSX?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Phillips 66 (PSX) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.