MNRO vs FFLO vs ABG Stock Comparison

Monro, Free Flow USA and Asbury Automotive Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MNRO Monro, Inc.
$13.41 -2.4% 1M -25.6% 1Y
Market cap
$422.98M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Auto Parts Retail Consumer Discretionary
FFLO Free Flow USA, Inc.
$0.31 +29.2% 1M +55.0% 1Y
Market cap
$9.61M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$33.90K
Div. yield
–
Auto Parts Retail Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
ABG Asbury Automotive Group Inc
$173.16 -6.4% 1M -27.6% 1Y
Market cap
$3.45B
P/E
6.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.98B
Div. yield
–
Auto Dealerships Consumer Discretionary
5 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Asbury Automotive leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Asbury Automotive 5, Free Flow USA 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMNROFFLOABGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $422.98M $9.61M $3.45B ABG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — -50.7x 6.8x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 111.7x — 6.4x ABG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +1,020.7% +4.1% FFLO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -558.8% 2.8% ABG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 7.8% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 3.9x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -25.6% +55.0% -27.6% FFLO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -26.3%/yr +10.3%/yr -2.7%/yr FFLO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 62.3% 224.7% 34.9% ABG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 23/100 59/100 ABG

Percentile Scorecard

MNROFFLOABG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMNROFFLOABG
Valuation – 3 #101 of 104 90 #11 of 104
Growth – 77 #24 of 99 28 #72 of 99
Profitability – 9 #90 of 99 57 #43 of 99
Financial Health 38 #71 of 113 4 #109 of 113 24 #86 of 113
Shareholder Returns 94 #5 of 73 – 96 #4 of 73
Overall – 23 59
  • MNRO ranked among 115 companies in Retail
  • FFLO ranked among 115 companies in Retail
  • ABG ranked among 115 companies in Retail

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMNROFFLOABGSPY
1 month -2.4%+29.2%-6.4% -0.8%
3 months -20.8%+287.5%-23.6% +3.5%
6 months -23.4%+520.0%-13.4% +7.0%
Year to date -33.1%+675.0%-25.5% +12.2%
1 year -25.6%+55.0%-27.6% +13.0%
3 years -48.5%+24.0%-7.2% +86.3%
3 years, per year -19.8%+7.4%-2.5% +23.1%
5 years -78.3%+63.2%-12.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year -26.3%+10.3%-2.7% +11.0%
10 years -75.6%-69.0%+242.6% +258.0%
10 years, per year -13.2%-11.1%+13.1% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureMNROFFLOABGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 62.3%224.7%34.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 70.3%—37.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.92-0.240.60 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.410.24-0.79 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -82.5%-96.9%-47.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -43.7%-11.4%-32.4% -1.8%
52-week high $23.81$0.35$256.03 $779.14
52-week low $11.27$0.04$161.79 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMNROFFLOABG
P/E now vs peer median —median 16.7x -50.7xmedian 16.7x 6.2xmedian 16.7x
P/S now vs peer median —median 0.5x 283.5xmedian 0.5x 0.2xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 9.0x —median 9.0x 7.5xmedian 9.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 16.5x —median 16.5x 6.3xmedian 16.5x
P/B now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 1.7x -8.1xmedian 1.7x 0.8xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.72 —median 0.72 -0.43median 0.72

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMNROFFLOABG
Revenue – $33.90K $17.98B
Gross profit – $33.90K $3.08B
Operating income – -$92.19K $782.30M
Net income – -$189.44K $509.50M
Free cash flow – – $496.30M
EPS (diluted) – – $27.84
Cash & equivalents $14.63M $4.19K $30.40M
Total debt $387.59M $2.00M $3.46B
Shares (diluted) 31.40M – 18.30M
Enterprise value $385.17M $9.51M $3.31B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMNROFFLOABG
P/E – -50.7x 6.2x
P/FCF – – 6.3x
P/Operating cash flow – – 3.8x
P/S – 283.5x 0.2x
P/B 0.7x -8.1x 0.8x
P/Tangible book 0.7x -8.1x 1.7x
EV/EBITDA – – 7.5x
EV/EBIT – -109.6x 8.3x
EV/Revenue – 298.1x 0.4x
EV/FCF – – 13.2x
EV/Operating cash flow – – 8.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – -0.43

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMNROFFLOABG
Revenue growth (1Y) – 1,021% 4.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -21.6% 6.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 1,412% 4.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 57.5% 1.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 57.1% -18.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 23.6% -12.8%
Net income growth (1Y) – 7.1% -5.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -24.6% -18.4%
EPS growth (1Y) – – 1.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – -14.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – -15.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 24.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – -32.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 16.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMNROFFLOABG
Gross margin – 100.0% 17.1%
EBITDA margin – – 4.9%
Operating margin – -272.0% 4.4%
Pretax margin – -228.5% 3.8%
Net margin – -558.8% 2.8%
FCF margin – – 2.8%
Operating cash flow margin – – 4.5%
Return on equity – – 13.0%
Return on assets – -38.2% 4.5%
Return on invested capital – – 7.8%
Return on capital employed – -714.6% 9.8%
Asset turnover – 0.2x 1.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMNROFFLOABG
Debt / assets 6.2% 252.6% 30.3%
Debt / equity 0.2x -0.4x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 3.9x
Debt / FCF – – 7.0x
Liabilities / assets 62.3% 702.7% 65.6%
Equity / assets 37.7% -602.7% 34.4%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 0.5x 1.0x 0.9x
Quick ratio 0.1x 0.0x 0.1x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.0x 0.0x
Altman Z-score – -9.24 2.47

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMNROFFLOABG
Dividend yield 8.4% – –
Net buyback yield – – 12.6%
Shareholder yield 8.4% – 12.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMNROFFLOABG
Forward P/E 111.7xFY2026 – 6.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.12FY2026 – $26.97FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -71.4%FY2026 – -4.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +275.0% – +12.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.18BFY2026 – $16.40BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +1.9%FY2026 – -8.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -2.6% – +6.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMNROFFLOABG
Held by institutions 100.0% – 100.0%
Institutions holding 182 – 315
Change in shares held, QoQ -7.2% – -2.4%
Institutions buying 96 – 173
Institutions selling 65 – 106
Buyers to sellers 1.48 – 1.63

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MNROFFLOABG
MNRO 1.00 -0.05 0.29
FFLO -0.05 1.00 -0.02
ABG 0.29 -0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MNRO, FFLO and ABG?

Asbury Automotive (ABG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Monro (MNRO) $422.98M, Free Flow USA (FFLO) $9.61M, Asbury Automotive (ABG) $3.45B.

Which company is growing faster?

Free Flow USA (FFLO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Free Flow USA (FFLO) +1,020.7%, Asbury Automotive (ABG) +4.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Asbury Automotive (ABG) has the highest net margin (Free Flow USA (FFLO) -558.8%, Asbury Automotive (ABG) 2.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Free Flow USA (FFLO) returned the most: Monro (MNRO) -25.6%, Free Flow USA (FFLO) +55.0%, Asbury Automotive (ABG) -27.6%. Over five years, Free Flow USA (FFLO) compounded fastest (Monro (MNRO) -26.3%/yr, Free Flow USA (FFLO) +10.3%/yr, Asbury Automotive (ABG) -2.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Asbury Automotive (ABG) has been the steadiest (Monro (MNRO) 62.3%, Free Flow USA (FFLO) 224.7%, Asbury Automotive (ABG) 34.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MNRO, FFLO and ABG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Asbury Automotive (ABG) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.