MNDY vs MSFT vs QXL Stock Comparison

Monday.Com, Microsoft and Quantum X Labs Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MNDY monday.com Ltd.
$94.78 +24.6% 1M -51.6% 1Y
Market cap
$4.95B
P/E
40.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.37B
Div. yield
–
Productivity Software Technology
1 win
MSFT Microsoft Corp
$530.14 +4.2% 1M -2.1% 1Y
Market cap
$3.89T
P/E
27.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$346.45B
Div. yield
0.01%
Cloud Platforms Technology
7 wins
QXL Quantum X Labs Inc.
$3.90 -14.8% 1M +9.9% 1Y
Market cap
$53.95M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
-$2.78M
Div. yield
–
Digital Advertising Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Microsoft leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Microsoft 7, Quantum X Labs 3, Monday.Com 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMNDYMSFTQXLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.95B $3.89T $53.95M MSFT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 40.8x 27.3x -4.1x MSFT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 16.1x 26.0x — MNDY
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +24.2% +17.9% +70.0% QXL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.9% 41.2% — MSFT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 26.5% 7.6% MSFT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.1x -0.7x QXL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -51.6% -2.1% +9.9% QXL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -23.9%/yr +9.8%/yr -0.2%/yr MSFT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 67.6% 32.6% 108.9% MSFT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 71/100 80/100 30/100 MSFT

Percentile Scorecard

MNDYMSFTQXL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMNDYMSFTQXL
Valuation 46 #16 of 29 60 #16 of 38 26 #124 of 166
Growth 92 #3 of 27 74 #10 of 36 13 #133 of 153
Profitability 60 #11 of 26 97 #2 of 34 32 #104 of 153
Financial Health 63 #12 of 31 83 #7 of 37 71 #52 of 179
Shareholder Returns 93 #2 of 15 84 #4 of 20 8 #84 of 91
Overall 71 80 30
  • MNDY ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software
  • MSFT ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing
  • QXL ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMNDYMSFTQXLSPY
1 month +24.6%+4.2%-14.8% +0.7%
3 months +7.5%+17.5%-11.4% +3.7%
6 months +43.9%+30.0%+25.4% +7.1%
Year to date -35.8%+9.6%+154.9% +12.8%
1 year -51.6%-2.1%+9.9% +11.9%
3 years -27.1%+57.2%+62.5% +85.2%
3 years, per year -10.0%+16.3%+17.6% +22.8%
5 years -74.5%+59.9%-0.8% +67.6%
5 years, per year -23.9%+9.8%-0.2% +10.9%
10 years —+785.5%-99.1% +262.0%
10 years, per year —+24.4%-37.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMNDYMSFTQXLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 67.6%32.6%108.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 68.6%30.7%112.5% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.600.990.39 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.76-0.060.09 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -86.8%-37.6%-99.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -53.8%-2.4%-43.1% -1.2%
52-week high $205.24$543.45$6.85 $779.14
52-week low $58.81$352.83$1.04 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMNDYMSFTQXL
P/E now vs peer median 40.2xmedian 33.1x 27.6xmedian 27.6x -4.3xmedian 16.7x
P/S now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 2.5x 11.4xmedian 4.6x -20.0xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 113.5xmedian 9.8x 19.0xmedian 25.6x 32.8xmedian 12.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 15.2xmedian 15.2x 65.7xmedian 15.4x -15.2xmedian 10.5x
P/B now vs peer median 7.8xmedian 3.1x 8.4xmedian 4.1x 2.2xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.65median 0.74 1.21median 0.80 0.01median 0.39

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMNDYMSFTQXL
Revenue $1.37B $346.45B -$2.78M
Gross profit $1.21B $234.39B –
Operating income $18.22M $163.19B $1.29M
Net income $121.24M $142.63B -$14.55M
Free cash flow $319.43M $59.96B -$3.66M
R&D $355.70M $36.46B $2.00K
EPS (diluted) $2.28 $19.16 $-0.65
Cash & equivalents $853.40M $20.28B $2.44M
Total debt – $35.48B $11.14M
Shares (diluted) 53.09M 7.45B 20.07M
Enterprise value -$316.25M $3.83T $46.35M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMNDYMSFTQXL
P/E 40.2x 27.6x -4.3x
P/FCF 15.2x 65.7x -15.2x
P/Operating cash flow 15.4x 20.1x -16.0x
P/S 3.5x 11.4x -20.0x
P/B 7.8x 8.4x 2.2x
P/Tangible book 7.9x 8.7x -140.8x
EV/EBITDA 113.5x 19.0x 32.8x
EV/EBIT 207.3x 23.9x 42.3x
EV/Revenue 2.8x 11.3x -19.6x
EV/FCF 11.8x 65.2x -14.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 12.0x 20.0x -15.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.65 1.21 0.01

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMNDYMSFTQXL
Revenue growth (1Y) 24.2% 17.9% 70.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 29.8% 16.6% -26.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 23.3% 16.0% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 29.9% 15.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 193.1% 20.0% -64.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 31.0% 20.2% -12.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 203.3% 36.0% 30.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 66.6% 22.8% -173.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 199.5% 36.3% 75.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 62.1% 22.8% -539.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -8.0% 33.2% -267.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 29.7% 27.3% -43.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -6.0% -23.1% -287.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 26.4% -1.8% -44.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMNDYMSFTQXL
Gross margin 88.7% 67.7% –
EBITDA margin 2.4% 59.3% –
Operating margin 1.3% 47.1% –
Pretax margin 4.7% 51.3% –
Net margin 8.9% 41.2% –
FCF margin 23.4% 17.3% –
Operating cash flow margin 23.0% 56.5% 124.9%
Return on equity 0.1% 31.2% -94.6%
Return on assets 0.0% 18.6% -69.4%
Return on invested capital – 26.5% 7.6%
Return on capital employed 2.1% 26.5% 7.6%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.5x -0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.6x 1.4x 0.2x
Stock comp / revenue 11.7% 3.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMNDYMSFTQXL
Debt / assets – 4.6% 4.0%
Debt / equity – 0.1x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.1x -0.7x
Debt / FCF – 0.6x -0.3x
Liabilities / assets 61.9% 39.6% 17.3%
Equity / assets 38.1% 60.4% 82.7%
Interest coverage – 50.6x –
Current ratio 1.5x 1.2x 0.9x
Quick ratio 1.4x 0.8x 0.7x
Cash ratio 1.4x 0.4x 0.6x
Altman Z-score 3.75 9.47 4.25

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMNDYMSFTQXL
Dividend yield – 0.7% –
Net buyback yield 11.7% 0.5% -8.3%
Shareholder yield 11.7% 1.2% -8.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 19.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 45.1% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 9.5% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 10.1% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMNDYMSFTQXL
Forward P/E 16.1xFY2026 26.0xFY2027 –
EPS, next fiscal year $5.89FY2026 $20.39FY2027 –
EPS growth, next FY +33.9%FY2026 +18.0%FY2027 –
EPS growth, the year after +9.3% +11.6% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.51BFY2026 $402.39BFY2027 –
Revenue growth, next FY +22.4%FY2026 +21.3%FY2027 –
Revenue growth, the year after +9.7% +12.9% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMNDYMSFTQXL
Held by institutions 62.6% 73.9% –
Institutions holding 274 6,231 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -12.3% +3.3% –
Institutions buying 143 3,435 –
Institutions selling 104 2,426 –
Buyers to sellers 1.38 1.42 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MNDYMSFTQXL
MNDY 1.00 0.34 -0.02
MSFT 0.34 1.00 0.04
QXL -0.02 0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MNDY, MSFT and QXL?

Microsoft (MSFT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Monday.Com (MNDY) $4.95B, Microsoft (MSFT) $3.89T, Quantum X Labs (QXL) $53.95M.

Which stock is cheaper, MNDY, MSFT and QXL?

Microsoft (MSFT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Monday.Com (MNDY) 40.8x, Microsoft (MSFT) 27.3x, Quantum X Labs (QXL) -4.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Monday.Com (MNDY) is cheapest (Monday.Com (MNDY) 16.1x, Microsoft (MSFT) 26.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Quantum X Labs (QXL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Monday.Com (MNDY) +24.2%, Microsoft (MSFT) +17.9%, Quantum X Labs (QXL) +70.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Microsoft (MSFT) has the highest net margin (Monday.Com (MNDY) 8.9%, Microsoft (MSFT) 41.2%). On return on invested capital, Microsoft (MSFT) leads (Microsoft (MSFT) 26.5%, Quantum X Labs (QXL) 7.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Quantum X Labs (QXL) returned the most: Monday.Com (MNDY) -51.6%, Microsoft (MSFT) -2.1%, Quantum X Labs (QXL) +9.9%. Over five years, Microsoft (MSFT) compounded fastest (Monday.Com (MNDY) -23.9%/yr, Microsoft (MSFT) +9.8%/yr, Quantum X Labs (QXL) -0.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Monday.Com (MNDY) 0.00%, Microsoft (MSFT) 0.01%, Quantum X Labs (QXL) 0.00%. Monday.Com (MNDY) and Quantum X Labs (QXL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Microsoft (MSFT) has been the steadiest (Monday.Com (MNDY) 67.6%, Microsoft (MSFT) 32.6%, Quantum X Labs (QXL) 108.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MNDY, MSFT and QXL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Microsoft (MSFT) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.