MMM vs ROK vs ZBRA Stock Comparison

3M, Rockwell Automation and Zebra Technologies Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (SYM) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MMM 3M Co
$177.38 +5.3% 1M +7.7% 1Y
Market cap
$90.04B
P/E
25.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$25.25B
Div. yield
0.02%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
5 wins
ROK Rockwell Automation, Inc
$451.43 +4.7% 1M +22.6% 1Y
Market cap
$48.25B
P/E
40.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.97B
Div. yield
–
Industrial Machinery Industrials
2 wins
ZBRA Zebra Technologies Corp
$377.38 +0.4% 1M +39.4% 1Y
Market cap
$17.11B
P/E
31.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.85B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

3M leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (3M 5, Zebra Technologies 4, Rockwell Automation 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMMMROKZBRALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $90.04B $48.25B $17.11B MMM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 25.5x 40.2x 31.7x MMM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.0x 36.1x 16.7x ZBRA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.7% +11.3% +12.7% ZBRA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 14.0% 13.4% 9.2% MMM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 22.0% 21.0% 10.6% MMM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.6x 1.3x 2.4x ROK
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +7.7% +22.6% +39.4% ZBRA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.5%/yr +7.2%/yr -6.7%/yr ROK
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.6% 31.3% 45.5% MMM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 50/100 54/100 62/100 ZBRA

Percentile Scorecard

MMMROKZBRA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMMMROKZBRA
Valuation 36 #130 of 203 15 #172 of 203 69 #35 of 112
Growth 60 #75 of 188 51 #93 of 188 46 #59 of 108
Profitability 89 #22 of 183 96 #9 of 183 85 #17 of 104
Financial Health 19 #176 of 216 34 #143 of 216 17 #96 of 116
Shareholder Returns 46 #82 of 152 76 #38 of 152 92 #7 of 78
Overall 50 54 62
  • MMM ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • ROK ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • ZBRA ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMMMROKZBRASPY
1 month +5.3%+4.7%+0.4% +0.7%
3 months +0.7%-4.1%+30.8% +3.7%
6 months +21.1%+10.4%+66.8% +7.1%
Year to date +10.8%+16.0%+55.4% +12.8%
1 year +7.7%+22.6%+39.4% +11.9%
3 years +137.0%+71.3%+79.9% +85.2%
3 years, per year +33.3%+19.7%+21.6% +22.8%
5 years +18.7%+41.3%-29.3% +67.6%
5 years, per year +3.5%+7.2%-6.7% +10.9%
10 years +28.0%+280.0%+469.5% +262.0%
10 years, per year +2.5%+14.3%+19.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMMMROKZBRASPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.6%31.3%45.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.7%31.8%38.1% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.681.401.70 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.300.720.87 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -53.4%-45.6%-67.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -3.5%-8.8%-3.5% -1.2%
52-week high $183.81$495.08$391.00 $779.14
52-week low $141.20$348.51$199.30 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMMMROKZBRA
P/E now vs peer median 26.0xmedian 25.8x 41.8xmedian 25.8x 33.4xmedian 32.9x
P/S now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 1.9x 5.6xmedian 1.9x 3.1xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 16.5xmedian 14.6x 25.3xmedian 14.6x 19.1xmedian 20.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 34.2xmedian 22.2x 33.3xmedian 22.2x 19.8xmedian 30.2x
P/B now vs peer median 22.0xmedian 2.2x 14.3xmedian 2.2x 5.2xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 0.73median 1.45 -9.51median 1.45 -8.84median 1.08

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMMMROKZBRA
Revenue $25.25B $8.97B $5.85B
Gross profit $9.98B $4.41B $2.90B
Operating income $4.74B $1.77B $858.00M
Net income $3.58B $1.20B $539.00M
Free cash flow $2.68B $1.50B $904.00M
R&D $1.21B $716.00M $622.00M
EPS (diluted) $6.77 $10.76 $11.20
Cash & equivalents $4.84B $479.00M $157.00M
Total debt $15.00B $13.81B $2.77B
Shares (diluted) 522.60M 111.60M 48.13M
Enterprise value $71.48B $46.43B $15.66B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMMMROKZBRA
P/E 26.0x 41.8x 33.4x
P/FCF 34.2x 33.3x 19.8x
P/Operating cash flow 25.3x 28.9x 18.2x
P/S 3.6x 5.6x 3.1x
P/B 22.0x 14.3x 5.2x
P/Tangible book 43.3x 18.0x 6.6x
EV/EBITDA 16.5x 25.3x 19.1x
EV/EBIT 21.4x 29.9x 23.9x
EV/Revenue 4.0x 5.9x 3.5x
EV/FCF 37.9x 35.2x 22.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 28.0x 30.5x 20.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.73 -9.51 -8.84

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMMMROKZBRA
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.7% 11.3% 12.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.7% 1.3% 2.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -1.8% 1.9% 14.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 17.0% 7.5% 4.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) -3.7% -7.1% 8.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 33.4% 2.9% -0.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 4.8% 23.8% -1.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 35.4% -5.5% -6.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 7.1% 25.2% 4.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 35.8% -4.4% -3.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 42.8% 13.8% 5.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.1% 22.8% 63.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 68.6% 13.9% 6.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.0% 23.6% 83.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMMMROKZBRA
Gross margin 39.5% 49.1% 49.6%
EBITDA margin 24.4% 23.3% 18.3%
Operating margin 18.8% 19.7% 14.7%
Pretax margin 17.5% 14.7% 12.1%
Net margin 14.0% 13.4% 9.2%
FCF margin 10.6% 16.8% 15.5%
Operating cash flow margin 14.4% 19.3% 16.7%
Return on equity 101.3% 30.9% 15.6%
Return on assets 9.8% 9.8% 6.4%
Return on invested capital 22.0% 21.0% 10.6%
Return on capital employed 18.7% 23.6% 19.1%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.8x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.0x 1.4x 1.8x
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% 1.0% 3.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMMMROKZBRA
Debt / assets 37.9% 29.4% 32.0%
Debt / equity 3.6x 0.9x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.6x 1.3x 2.4x
Debt / FCF 5.6x 2.2x 3.1x
Liabilities / assets 89.5% 68.5% 60.2%
Equity / assets 10.5% 31.5% 39.8%
Interest coverage – 12.8x –
Current ratio 1.4x 1.1x 0.5x
Quick ratio 0.8x 0.7x 0.3x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.1x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 4.14 6.07 3.71

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMMMROKZBRA
Dividend yield 1.7% 1.2% –
Net buyback yield 3.0% 1.4% 5.1%
Shareholder yield 4.7% 2.6% 5.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) 44.8% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 59.9% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.2% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -21.4% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMMMROKZBRA
Forward P/E 20.0xFY2026 36.1xFY2026 16.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $8.88FY2026 $12.50FY2026 $22.59FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +10.2%FY2026 +18.7%FY2026 +42.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +16.7% +12.3% -4.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $23.87BFY2026 $8.50BFY2026 $6.35BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -1.8%FY2026 +1.9%FY2026 +17.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +17.6% +19.4% +1.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMMMROKZBRA
Held by institutions 74.5% 89.2% 100.0%
Institutions holding 2,211 1,542 645
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.8% +3.5% +4.5%
Institutions buying 916 807 309
Institutions selling 838 437 242
Buyers to sellers 1.09 1.85 1.28

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MMMROKZBRA
MMM 1.00 0.28 0.35
ROK 0.28 1.00 0.18
ZBRA 0.35 0.18 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MMM, ROK and ZBRA?

3M (MMM) is the largest by market capitalisation: 3M (MMM) $90.04B, Rockwell Automation (ROK) $48.25B, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) $17.11B.

Which stock is cheaper, MMM, ROK and ZBRA?

3M (MMM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (3M (MMM) 25.5x, Rockwell Automation (ROK) 40.2x, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 31.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) is cheapest (3M (MMM) 20.0x, Rockwell Automation (ROK) 36.1x, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 16.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: 3M (MMM) +1.7%, Rockwell Automation (ROK) +11.3%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) +12.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

3M (MMM) has the highest net margin (3M (MMM) 14.0%, Rockwell Automation (ROK) 13.4%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 9.2%). On return on invested capital, 3M (MMM) leads (3M (MMM) 22.0%, Rockwell Automation (ROK) 21.0%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 10.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) returned the most: 3M (MMM) +7.7%, Rockwell Automation (ROK) +22.6%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) +39.4%. Over five years, Rockwell Automation (ROK) compounded fastest (3M (MMM) +3.5%/yr, Rockwell Automation (ROK) +7.2%/yr, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) -6.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: 3M (MMM) 0.02%, Rockwell Automation (ROK) 0.00%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 0.00%. Rockwell Automation (ROK) and Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, 3M (MMM) has been the steadiest (3M (MMM) 25.6%, Rockwell Automation (ROK) 31.3%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 45.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MMM, ROK and ZBRA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, 3M (MMM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.