MMM vs PBI vs ZBRA Stock Comparison

3M, Pitney Bowes and Zebra Technologies Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MMM 3M Co
$172.82 +2.0% 1M +3.6% 1Y
Market cap
$90.81B
P/E
25.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$25.25B
Div. yield
0.02%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
5 wins
PBI Pitney Bowes Inc /De/
$17.43 +6.4% 1M +47.8% 1Y
Market cap
$2.38B
P/E
12.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.87B
Div. yield
0.02%
Office Equipment Industrials
6 wins
ZBRA Zebra Technologies Corp
$384.70 +3.5% 1M +40.2% 1Y
Market cap
$18.50B
P/E
34.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.85B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
1 win

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Pitney Bowes leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Pitney Bowes 6, 3M 5, Zebra Technologies 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMMMPBIZBRALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $90.81B $2.38B $18.50B MMM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 25.7x 12.7x 34.3x PBI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.5x 9.7x 17.0x PBI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.7% -5.3% +12.7% ZBRA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 14.0% 10.0% 9.2% MMM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 22.0% 18.8% 10.6% MMM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.6x 4.2x 2.4x MMM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% 0.02% 0.00% PBI
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +3.6% +47.8% +40.2% PBI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.0%/yr +20.2%/yr -6.4%/yr PBI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.6% 34.2% 45.5% MMM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 50/100 77/100 62/100 PBI

Percentile Scorecard

MMMPBIZBRA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMMMPBIZBRA
Valuation 38 #126 of 203 92 #10 of 113 69 #35 of 111
Growth 59 #77 of 188 92 #9 of 96 46 #59 of 108
Profitability 87 #24 of 184 96 #5 of 92 85 #17 of 104
Financial Health 19 #177 of 217 16 #105 of 125 18 #94 of 115
Shareholder Returns 47 #82 of 153 89 #8 of 67 94 #6 of 78
Overall 50 77 62
  • MMM ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • PBI ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • ZBRA ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMMMPBIZBRASPY
1 month +2.0%+6.4%+3.5% +0.9%
3 months -2.9%-1.4%+35.9% +5.9%
6 months +20.1%+10.7%+78.5% +8.5%
Year to date +7.9%+64.9%+58.4% +13.3%
1 year +3.6%+47.8%+40.2% +12.4%
3 years +136.2%+469.6%+85.7% +88.1%
3 years, per year +33.2%+78.7%+22.9% +23.5%
5 years +15.7%+151.2%-28.0% +68.2%
5 years, per year +3.0%+20.2%-6.4% +11.0%
10 years +24.7%-3.6%+480.5% +263.4%
10 years, per year +2.2%-0.4%+19.2% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureMMMPBIZBRASPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.6%34.2%45.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.6%34.4%38.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.690.701.70 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.141.400.88 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -53.4%-70.9%-67.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -6.0%-5.9%-1.6% -0.9%
52-week high $183.81$18.52$391.00 $779.14
52-week low $141.20$9.02$199.30 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMMMPBIZBRA
P/E now vs peer median 25.4xmedian 25.4x 12.7xmedian 21.5x 34.1xmedian 33.5x
P/S now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 1.9x 1.3xmedian 0.9x 3.1xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 16.1xmedian 14.3x 9.9xmedian 11.9x 19.4xmedian 19.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 33.4xmedian 21.8x 5.8xmedian 13.9x 20.1xmedian 29.8x
P/B now vs peer median 21.4xmedian 2.2x -2.8xmedian 2.3x 5.3xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 0.71median 1.41 0.23median 0.92 -9.01median 1.10

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMMMPBIZBRA
Revenue $25.25B $1.87B $5.85B
Gross profit $9.98B $1.06B $2.90B
Operating income $4.74B $306.05M $858.00M
Net income $3.58B $187.35M $539.00M
Free cash flow $2.68B $415.24M $904.00M
R&D $1.21B $14.09M $622.00M
EPS (diluted) $6.77 $1.35 $11.20
Cash & equivalents $4.84B $266.83M $157.00M
Total debt $15.00B $2.03B $2.77B
Shares (diluted) 522.60M 139.04M 48.13M
Enterprise value $72.26B $1.16B $17.05B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMMMPBIZBRA
P/E 25.4x 12.7x 34.1x
P/FCF 33.4x 5.8x 20.1x
P/Operating cash flow 24.6x 4.9x 18.6x
P/S 3.5x 1.3x 3.1x
P/B 21.4x -2.8x 5.3x
P/Tangible book 42.2x -2.7x 6.7x
EV/EBITDA 16.1x 9.9x 19.4x
EV/EBIT 20.9x 13.5x 24.3x
EV/Revenue 3.9x 2.2x 3.6x
EV/FCF 37.0x 10.0x 23.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 27.3x 8.5x 21.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.71 0.23 -9.01

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMMMPBIZBRA
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.7% -5.3% 12.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.7% 2.5% 2.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -1.8% -2.4% 14.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 17.0% -0.6% 4.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) -3.7% 377.3% 8.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 33.4% 35.8% -0.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 4.8% 269.6% -1.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 35.4% 49.8% -6.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 7.1% 320.8% 4.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 35.8% 55.0% -3.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 42.8% 66.8% 5.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.1% 23.9% 63.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 68.6% 89.3% 6.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.0% 31.6% 83.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMMMPBIZBRA
Gross margin 39.5% 57.0% 49.6%
EBITDA margin 24.4% 22.4% 18.3%
Operating margin 18.8% 16.4% 14.7%
Pretax margin 17.5% 13.5% 12.1%
Net margin 14.0% 10.0% 9.2%
FCF margin 10.6% 22.3% 15.5%
Operating cash flow margin 14.4% 26.0% 16.7%
Return on equity 101.3% – 15.6%
Return on assets 9.8% 6.1% 6.4%
Return on invested capital 22.0% 18.8% 10.6%
Return on capital employed 18.7% 18.4% 19.1%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.6x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.0x 2.6x 1.8x
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% 0.8% 3.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMMMPBIZBRA
Debt / assets 37.9% 67.4% 32.0%
Debt / equity 3.6x -2.4x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.6x 4.2x 2.4x
Debt / FCF 5.6x 4.9x 3.1x
Liabilities / assets 89.5% 128.6% 60.2%
Equity / assets 10.5% -28.6% 39.8%
Interest coverage – 5.7x –
Current ratio 1.4x 0.7x 0.5x
Quick ratio 0.8x 0.3x 0.3x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.2x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 4.10 2.42 3.75

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMMMPBIZBRA
Dividend yield 1.8% 2.2% –
Net buyback yield 3.1% 19.9% 5.0%
Shareholder yield 4.8% 22.1% 5.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 44.8% 29.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 59.9% 13.1% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.2% 30.1% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -21.4% 15.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMMMPBIZBRA
Forward P/E 19.5xFY2026 9.7xFY2026 17.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $8.88FY2026 $1.79FY2026 $22.59FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +10.2%FY2026 +32.6%FY2026 +42.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +16.7% +5.0% -4.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $23.87BFY2026 $1.77BFY2026 $6.35BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -1.8%FY2026 -6.3%FY2026 +17.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +17.6% +10.9% +1.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMMMPBIZBRA
Held by institutions 74.5% 88.8% 100.0%
Institutions holding 2,210 350 644
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.8% +2.6% +4.5%
Institutions buying 916 167 309
Institutions selling 837 119 242
Buyers to sellers 1.09 1.40 1.28

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MMMPBIZBRA
MMM 1.00 0.14 0.34
PBI 0.14 1.00 0.12
ZBRA 0.34 0.12 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MMM, PBI and ZBRA?

3M (MMM) is the largest by market capitalisation: 3M (MMM) $90.81B, Pitney Bowes (PBI) $2.38B, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) $18.50B.

Which stock is cheaper, MMM, PBI and ZBRA?

Pitney Bowes (PBI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (3M (MMM) 25.7x, Pitney Bowes (PBI) 12.7x, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 34.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Pitney Bowes (PBI) is cheapest (3M (MMM) 19.5x, Pitney Bowes (PBI) 9.7x, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 17.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: 3M (MMM) +1.7%, Pitney Bowes (PBI) -5.3%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) +12.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

3M (MMM) has the highest net margin (3M (MMM) 14.0%, Pitney Bowes (PBI) 10.0%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 9.2%). On return on invested capital, 3M (MMM) leads (3M (MMM) 22.0%, Pitney Bowes (PBI) 18.8%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 10.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Pitney Bowes (PBI) returned the most: 3M (MMM) +3.6%, Pitney Bowes (PBI) +47.8%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) +40.2%. Over five years, Pitney Bowes (PBI) compounded fastest (3M (MMM) +3.0%/yr, Pitney Bowes (PBI) +20.2%/yr, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) -6.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Pitney Bowes (PBI) has the highest dividend yield: 3M (MMM) 0.02%, Pitney Bowes (PBI) 0.02%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 0.00%. Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, 3M (MMM) has been the steadiest (3M (MMM) 25.6%, Pitney Bowes (PBI) 34.2%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 45.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MMM, PBI and ZBRA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Pitney Bowes (PBI) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.