MMM vs PBI vs YIBO Stock Comparison

3M, Pitney Bowes and Planet Image International Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MMM 3M Co
$177.38 +5.3% 1M +7.7% 1Y
Market cap
$91.66B
P/E
26.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$25.25B
Div. yield
1.73%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
6 wins
PBI Pitney Bowes Inc /De/
$16.47 +1.0% 1M +46.9% 1Y
Market cap
$2.23B
P/E
12.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.86B
Div. yield
2.31%
Office Equipment Industrials
6 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

3M leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (3M 6, Pitney Bowes 6). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMMMPBIYIBOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $91.66B $2.23B $58.12M MMM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 26.0x 12.0x — PBI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.0x 9.2x — PBI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.7% -3.5% — MMM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 14.0% 10.1% — MMM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 22.0% 20.3% — MMM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.6x 3.9x — MMM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.73% 2.31% — PBI
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +7.7% +46.9% -14.3% PBI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.5%/yr +18.9%/yr — PBI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.6% 34.3% 90.6% MMM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 50/100 78/100 — PBI

Percentile Scorecard

MMMPBIYIBO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMMMPBIYIBO
Valuation 36 #130 of 203 94 #8 of 113 –
Growth 60 #75 of 188 92 #9 of 96 –
Profitability 89 #22 of 183 96 #5 of 91 –
Financial Health 19 #176 of 216 16 #103 of 122 60 #50 of 122
Shareholder Returns 46 #82 of 152 91 #7 of 66 –
Overall 50 78 –
  • MMM ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • PBI ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • YIBO ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMMMPBIYIBOSPY
1 month +5.3%+1.0%-8.9% +0.7%
3 months +0.7%-9.2%-19.0% +3.7%
6 months +21.1%+6.5%-7.3% +7.1%
Year to date +10.8%+55.8%+7.4% +12.8%
1 year +7.7%+46.9%-14.3% +11.9%
3 years +137.0%+424.5%— +85.2%
3 years, per year +33.3%+73.8%— +22.8%
5 years +18.7%+137.3%— +67.6%
5 years, per year +3.5%+18.9%— +10.9%
10 years +28.0%-9.0%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +2.5%-0.9%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMMMPBIYIBOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.6%34.3%90.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.7%34.6%89.8% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.680.720.25 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.301.37-0.16 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -53.4%-70.9%-85.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -3.5%-11.1%-25.0% -1.2%
52-week high $183.81$18.52$1.36 $779.14
52-week low $141.20$9.02$0.74 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMMMPBIYIBO
P/E now vs peer median 26.0xmedian 25.8x 12.0xmedian 21.9x —median 21.9x
P/S now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 1.9x 1.2xmedian 0.9x —median 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 16.5xmedian 14.6x 9.3xmedian 11.9x —median 11.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 34.2xmedian 22.2x 4.4xmedian 14.4x —median 14.4x
P/B now vs peer median 22.0xmedian 2.2x -2.7xmedian 2.4x 1.0xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.73median 1.45 0.23median 0.97 —median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMMMPBIYIBO
Revenue $25.25B $1.86B –
Gross profit $9.98B $1.06B –
Operating income $4.74B $305.03M –
Net income $3.58B $188.05M –
Free cash flow $2.68B $504.62M –
R&D $1.21B $14.07M –
EPS (diluted) $6.77 $1.34 –
Cash & equivalents $4.84B $268.51M $24.53M
Total debt $15.00B $1.89B $117.72M
Shares (diluted) 522.60M 140.73M 56.98M
Enterprise value $74.07B $1.06B -$130.62M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMMMPBIYIBO
P/E 26.0x 12.0x –
P/FCF 34.2x 4.4x –
P/Operating cash flow 25.3x 3.9x –
P/S 3.6x 1.2x –
P/B 22.0x -2.7x 1.0x
P/Tangible book 43.3x -2.6x 1.0x
EV/EBITDA 16.5x 9.3x –
EV/EBIT 21.4x 12.6x –
EV/Revenue 4.0x 2.1x –
EV/FCF 37.9x 7.6x –
EV/Operating cash flow 28.0x 6.7x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.73 0.23 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMMMPBIYIBO
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.7% -3.5% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.7% 9.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -1.8% -2.2% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 17.0% -0.3% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -3.7% 87.0% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 33.4% 35.9% –
Net income growth (1Y) 4.8% 135.1% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 35.4% 47.5% –
EPS growth (1Y) 7.1% 184.6% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 35.8% 52.0% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 42.8% 94.2% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.1% 12.2% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 68.6% 124.1% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.0% 11.1% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMMMPBIYIBO
Gross margin 39.5% 57.1% –
EBITDA margin 24.4% 22.1% –
Operating margin 18.8% 16.4% –
Pretax margin 17.5% 13.7% –
Net margin 14.0% 10.1% –
FCF margin 10.6% 27.1% –
Operating cash flow margin 14.4% 30.6% –
Return on equity 101.3% – –
Return on assets 9.8% 6.3% –
Return on invested capital 22.0% 20.3% –
Return on capital employed 18.7% 20.2% –
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.6x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.0x 3.0x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% 0.9% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMMMPBIYIBO
Debt / assets 37.9% 63.1% 23.0%
Debt / equity 3.6x -2.3x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.6x 3.9x –
Debt / FCF 5.6x 3.7x –
Liabilities / assets 89.5% 128.0% 59.5%
Equity / assets 10.5% -28.0% 40.5%
Interest coverage – 6.0x –
Current ratio 1.4x 0.7x 1.7x
Quick ratio 0.8x 0.3x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.2x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 4.14 2.41 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMMMPBIYIBO
Dividend yield 1.7% 2.3% –
Net buyback yield 3.0% 14.9% –
Shareholder yield 4.7% 17.2% –
Payout ratio (earnings) 44.8% 29.1% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 59.9% 10.9% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.2% 19.0% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -21.4% 16.0% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMMMPBIYIBO
Forward P/E 20.0xFY2026 9.2xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $8.88FY2026 $1.79FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +10.2%FY2026 +32.6%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +16.7% +5.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $23.87BFY2026 $1.77BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY -1.8%FY2026 -6.3%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +17.6% +10.9% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMMMPBIYIBO
Held by institutions 74.5% 88.8% –
Institutions holding 2,211 350 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.8% +2.6% –
Institutions buying 916 167 –
Institutions selling 838 119 –
Buyers to sellers 1.09 1.40 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MMMPBIYIBO
MMM 1.00 0.14 0.07
PBI 0.14 1.00 -0.02
YIBO 0.07 -0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MMM, PBI and YIBO?

3M (MMM) is the largest by market capitalisation: 3M (MMM) $91.66B, Pitney Bowes (PBI) $2.23B, Planet Image International (YIBO) $58.12M.

Which stock is cheaper, MMM, PBI and YIBO?

Pitney Bowes (PBI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (3M (MMM) 26.0x, Pitney Bowes (PBI) 12.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Pitney Bowes (PBI) is cheapest (3M (MMM) 20.0x, Pitney Bowes (PBI) 9.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

3M (MMM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: 3M (MMM) +1.7%, Pitney Bowes (PBI) -3.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

3M (MMM) has the highest net margin (3M (MMM) 14.0%, Pitney Bowes (PBI) 10.1%). On return on invested capital, 3M (MMM) leads (3M (MMM) 22.0%, Pitney Bowes (PBI) 20.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Pitney Bowes (PBI) returned the most: 3M (MMM) +7.7%, Pitney Bowes (PBI) +46.9%, Planet Image International (YIBO) -14.3%. Over five years, Pitney Bowes (PBI) compounded fastest (3M (MMM) +3.5%/yr, Pitney Bowes (PBI) +18.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Pitney Bowes (PBI) has the highest dividend yield: 3M (MMM) 1.73%, Pitney Bowes (PBI) 2.31%. Planet Image International (YIBO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, 3M (MMM) has been the steadiest (3M (MMM) 25.6%, Pitney Bowes (PBI) 34.3%, Planet Image International (YIBO) 90.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MMM, PBI and YIBO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, 3M (MMM) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.