MMM vs PBI vs ITW Stock Comparison

3M, Pitney Bowes and Illinois Tool Works Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MMM 3M Co
$173.47 +1.9% 1M +1.1% 1Y
Market cap
$89.47B
P/E
25.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$25.25B
Div. yield
0.02%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
1 win
PBI Pitney Bowes Inc /De/
$17.35 +6.6% 1M +48.8% 1Y
Market cap
$2.36B
P/E
12.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.87B
Div. yield
0.02%
Office Equipment Industrials
6 wins
ITW Illinois Tool Works Inc
$275.75 +0.8% 1M +7.1% 1Y
Market cap
$79.10B
P/E
24.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.47B
Div. yield
0.02%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Pitney Bowes leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Pitney Bowes 6, Illinois Tool Works 5, 3M 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMMMPBIITWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $89.47B $2.36B $79.10B MMM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 25.3x 12.6x 24.8x PBI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.8x 9.7x 25.8x PBI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.7% -5.3% +4.3% ITW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 14.0% 10.0% 19.4% ITW
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 22.0% -33.8% 27.1% ITW
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.6x -4.0x 1.9x PBI
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% 0.02% 0.02% ITW
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +1.1% +48.8% +7.1% PBI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +2.8%/yr +19.6%/yr +4.2%/yr PBI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.6% 34.3% 21.8% ITW
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 49/100 64/100 48/100 PBI

Percentile Scorecard

MMMPBIITW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMMMPBIITW
Valuation 37 #129 of 203 75 #29 of 112 24 #154 of 203
Growth 60 #76 of 188 88 #12 of 96 33 #127 of 188
Profitability 87 #25 of 187 54 #43 of 93 100 #2 of 187
Financial Health 18 #183 of 222 10 #114 of 126 23 #172 of 222
Shareholder Returns 44 #86 of 153 91 #7 of 67 60 #62 of 153
Overall 49 64 48
  • MMM ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • PBI ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • ITW ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMMMPBIITWSPY
1 month +1.9%+6.6%+0.8% -1.0%
3 months +0.5%-3.1%-2.6% +2.9%
6 months +18.8%+11.4%+2.4% +6.4%
Year to date +8.4%+64.1%+12.0% +11.4%
1 year +1.1%+48.8%+7.1% +13.1%
3 years +130.2%+432.2%+23.6% +79.4%
3 years, per year +32.1%+74.7%+7.3% +21.5%
5 years +14.8%+144.4%+22.8% +67.7%
5 years, per year +2.8%+19.6%+4.2% +10.9%
10 years +22.4%+1.2%+143.9% +255.2%
10 years, per year +2.0%+0.1%+9.3% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureMMMPBIITWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.6%34.3%21.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.7%34.4%21.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.680.710.45 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.041.420.33 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -53.4%-70.9%-28.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -5.6%-6.3%-8.0% -2.5%
52-week high $183.81$18.52$299.60 $779.14
52-week low $141.20$9.02$241.07 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMMMPBIITW
P/E now vs peer median 25.5xmedian 25.9x 12.7xmedian 21.0x 24.7xmedian 25.9x
P/S now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 1.9x 1.3xmedian 0.9x 4.8xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 16.1xmedian 13.7x -9.4xmedian 12.3x 18.3xmedian 13.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 33.5xmedian 21.1x 5.7xmedian 15.1x 26.9xmedian 21.1x
P/B now vs peer median 21.5xmedian 2.3x -2.8xmedian 2.4x 27.1xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.71median 1.19 0.23median 1.02 8.36median 1.19

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMMMPBIITW
Revenue $25.25B $1.87B $16.47B
Gross profit $9.98B $1.06B $7.27B
Operating income $4.74B -$550.89M $4.36B
Net income $3.58B $187.35M $3.19B
Free cash flow $2.68B $415.24M $2.92B
R&D $1.21B $14.09M –
EPS (diluted) $6.77 $1.35 $11.13
Cash & equivalents $4.84B $266.83M $839.00M
Total debt $15.00B $2.03B $9.69B
Shares (diluted) 522.60M 139.04M 287.00M
Enterprise value $70.91B $1.14B $75.66B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMMMPBIITW
P/E 25.5x 12.7x 24.7x
P/FCF 33.5x 5.7x 26.9x
P/Operating cash flow 24.7x 4.9x 23.6x
P/S 3.6x 1.3x 4.8x
P/B 21.5x -2.8x 27.1x
P/Tangible book 42.3x -2.7x 33.6x
EV/EBITDA 16.1x -9.4x 18.3x
EV/EBIT 21.0x -7.5x 20.0x
EV/Revenue 3.9x 2.2x 5.3x
EV/FCF 37.2x 10.0x 29.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 27.4x 8.5x 26.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.71 0.23 8.36

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMMMPBIITW
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.7% -5.3% 4.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.7% 2.5% 0.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -1.8% -2.4% 5.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 17.0% -0.6% 2.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) -3.7% 38.0% 6.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 33.4% 23.1% 3.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 4.8% 269.6% -5.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 35.4% 49.8% 1.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 7.1% 320.8% -3.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 35.8% 55.0% 3.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 42.8% 66.8% 5.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.1% 23.9% 3.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 68.6% 89.3% 7.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.0% 31.6% 4.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMMMPBIITW
Gross margin 39.5% 57.0% 44.2%
EBITDA margin 24.4% -23.5% 28.9%
Operating margin 18.8% -29.5% 26.5%
Pretax margin 17.5% 13.5% 25.0%
Net margin 14.0% 10.0% 19.4%
FCF margin 10.6% 22.3% 17.7%
Operating cash flow margin 14.4% 26.0% 20.2%
Return on equity 101.3% – 104.3%
Return on assets 9.8% 6.1% 19.5%
Return on invested capital 22.0% -33.8% 27.1%
Return on capital employed 18.7% -33.1% 41.9%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.6x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.0x 2.6x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% 0.8% 0.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMMMPBIITW
Debt / assets 37.9% 67.4% 58.8%
Debt / equity 3.6x -2.4x 3.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.6x -4.0x 1.9x
Debt / FCF 5.6x 4.9x 3.3x
Liabilities / assets 89.5% 128.6% 82.4%
Equity / assets 10.5% -28.6% 17.6%
Interest coverage – -10.3x 14.5x
Current ratio 1.4x 0.7x 1.1x
Quick ratio 0.8x 0.3x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.2x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 4.10 1.48 8.00

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMMMPBIITW
Dividend yield 1.8% 2.2% 2.4%
Net buyback yield 3.0% 20.0% 2.3%
Shareholder yield 4.8% 22.2% 4.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) 44.8% 29.0% 57.4%
Payout ratio (FCF) 59.9% 13.1% 62.8%
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.2% 30.1% 5.5%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -21.4% 15.9% 5.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMMMPBIITW
Forward P/E 19.8xFY2026 9.7xFY2026 25.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $8.75FY2026 $1.79FY2026 $10.67FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +8.6%FY2026 +32.6%FY2026 +1.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +17.9% +5.0% +19.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $23.87BFY2026 $1.77BFY2026 $16.46BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -1.8%FY2026 -6.3%FY2026 +2.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +17.4% +10.9% +11.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMMMPBIITW
Held by institutions 74.5% 88.8% 84.9%
Institutions holding 2,208 350 1,969
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.8% +2.6% +0.8%
Institutions buying 914 167 846
Institutions selling 837 119 750
Buyers to sellers 1.09 1.40 1.13

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MMMPBIITW
MMM 1.00 0.15 0.56
PBI 0.15 1.00 0.12
ITW 0.56 0.12 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MMM, PBI and ITW?

3M (MMM) is the largest by market capitalisation: 3M (MMM) $89.47B, Pitney Bowes (PBI) $2.36B, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) $79.10B.

Which stock is cheaper, MMM, PBI and ITW?

Pitney Bowes (PBI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (3M (MMM) 25.3x, Pitney Bowes (PBI) 12.6x, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 24.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Pitney Bowes (PBI) is cheapest (3M (MMM) 19.8x, Pitney Bowes (PBI) 9.7x, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 25.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Illinois Tool Works (ITW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: 3M (MMM) +1.7%, Pitney Bowes (PBI) -5.3%, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) +4.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Illinois Tool Works (ITW) has the highest net margin (3M (MMM) 14.0%, Pitney Bowes (PBI) 10.0%, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 19.4%). On return on invested capital, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) leads (3M (MMM) 22.0%, Pitney Bowes (PBI) -33.8%, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 27.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Pitney Bowes (PBI) returned the most: 3M (MMM) +1.1%, Pitney Bowes (PBI) +48.8%, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) +7.1%. Over five years, Pitney Bowes (PBI) compounded fastest (3M (MMM) +2.8%/yr, Pitney Bowes (PBI) +19.6%/yr, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) +4.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Illinois Tool Works (ITW) has the highest dividend yield: 3M (MMM) 0.02%, Pitney Bowes (PBI) 0.02%, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 0.02%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) has been the steadiest (3M (MMM) 25.6%, Pitney Bowes (PBI) 34.3%, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 21.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MMM, PBI and ITW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Pitney Bowes (PBI) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.