MMM vs ITW vs FTV Stock Comparison

3M, Illinois Tool Works and Fortive Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MMM 3M Co
$172.79 +1.9% 1M +2.5% 1Y
Market cap
$88.87B
P/E
25.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$25.25B
Div. yield
0.02%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
3 wins
ITW Illinois Tool Works Inc
$276.01 +0.7% 1M +12.3% 1Y
Market cap
$79.53B
P/E
24.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.47B
Div. yield
0.02%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
6 wins
FTV Fortive Corp
$60.78 +8.3% 1M +22.9% 1Y
Market cap
$18.47B
P/E
34.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.32B
Div. yield
0.00%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Illinois Tool Works leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Illinois Tool Works 6, 3M 3, Fortive 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMMMITWFTVLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $88.87B $79.53B $18.47B MMM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 25.1x 24.9x 34.6x ITW
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.5x 25.9x 19.0x FTV
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.7% +4.3% +5.6% FTV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 14.0% 19.4% 12.4% ITW
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 22.0% 27.1% 7.4% ITW
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.6x 1.9x 2.5x MMM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% 0.02% 0.00% ITW
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +2.5% +12.3% +22.9% FTV
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.0%/yr +4.4%/yr -3.9%/yr ITW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.6% 21.3% 26.8% ITW
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 49/100 48/100 48/100 MMM

Percentile Scorecard

MMMITWFTV

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMMMITWFTV
Valuation 37 #129 of 203 26 #150 of 203 45 #112 of 203
Growth 59 #77 of 187 33 #125 of 187 19 #151 of 187
Profitability 86 #26 of 185 100 #2 of 185 73 #50 of 185
Financial Health 18 #179 of 219 23 #170 of 219 39 #133 of 219
Shareholder Returns 43 #87 of 153 59 #63 of 153 61 #61 of 153
Overall 49 48 48
  • MMM ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • ITW ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • FTV ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMMMITWFTVSPY
1 month +1.9%+0.7%+8.3% -0.8%
3 months -3.0%-3.0%-3.4% +3.5%
6 months +18.5%+2.3%-2.0% +7.0%
Year to date +7.9%+12.1%+10.1% +12.2%
1 year +2.5%+12.3%+22.9% +13.0%
3 years +136.1%+23.6%-6.5% +86.3%
3 years, per year +33.2%+7.3%-2.2% +23.1%
5 years +15.9%+24.2%-17.9% +68.6%
5 years, per year +3.0%+4.4%-3.9% +11.0%
10 years +24.1%+143.4%+27.2% +258.0%
10 years, per year +2.2%+9.3%+2.4% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureMMMITWFTVSPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.6%21.3%26.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.7%20.8%26.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.690.470.60 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.100.580.85 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -53.4%-28.9%-46.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -6.0%-7.9%-5.3% -1.8%
52-week high $183.81$299.60$64.16 $779.14
52-week low $141.20$241.07$49.16 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMMMITWFTV
P/E now vs peer median 25.4xmedian 26.0x 24.7xmedian 26.0x 34.6xmedian 26.0x
P/S now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 1.9x 4.8xmedian 1.9x 4.3xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 16.1xmedian 14.0x 18.4xmedian 14.0x 17.4xmedian 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 33.4xmedian 21.4x 26.9xmedian 21.4x 19.6xmedian 21.4x
P/B now vs peer median 21.4xmedian 2.2x 27.2xmedian 2.2x 3.0xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.71median 1.26 8.37median 1.26 -4.19median 1.26

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMMMITWFTV
Revenue $25.25B $16.47B $4.32B
Gross profit $9.98B $7.27B $2.73B
Operating income $4.74B $4.36B $786.70M
Net income $3.58B $3.19B $534.40M
Free cash flow $2.68B $2.92B $937.60M
R&D $1.21B – $262.00M
EPS (diluted) $6.77 $11.13 $1.74
Cash & equivalents $4.84B $839.00M $374.20M
Total debt $15.00B $9.69B $3.51B
Shares (diluted) 522.60M 287.00M 307.60M
Enterprise value $70.31B $76.09B $16.93B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMMMITWFTV
P/E 25.4x 24.7x 34.6x
P/FCF 33.4x 26.9x 19.6x
P/Operating cash flow 24.6x 23.6x 17.5x
P/S 3.5x 4.8x 4.3x
P/B 21.4x 27.2x 3.0x
P/Tangible book 42.2x 33.6x 4.5x
EV/EBITDA 16.1x 18.4x 17.4x
EV/EBIT 20.9x 20.0x 27.4x
EV/Revenue 3.9x 5.3x 5.0x
EV/FCF 37.0x 29.9x 23.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 27.3x 26.3x 20.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.71 8.37 -4.19

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMMMITWFTV
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.7% 4.3% 5.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.7% 0.8% -10.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -1.8% 5.3% 4.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 17.0% 2.7% -7.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) -3.7% 6.4% 9.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 33.4% 3.4% -9.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 4.8% -5.1% -30.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 35.4% 1.0% -12.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 7.1% -3.1% -22.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 35.8% 3.0% -8.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 42.8% 5.8% -30.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.1% 3.1% -6.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 68.6% 7.2% -34.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.0% 4.1% -7.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMMMITWFTV
Gross margin 39.5% 44.2% 63.2%
EBITDA margin 24.4% 28.9% 28.6%
Operating margin 18.8% 26.5% 18.2%
Pretax margin 17.5% 25.0% 15.6%
Net margin 14.0% 19.4% 12.4%
FCF margin 10.6% 17.7% 21.7%
Operating cash flow margin 14.4% 20.2% 24.4%
Return on equity 101.3% 104.3% 8.8%
Return on assets 9.8% 19.5% 4.6%
Return on invested capital 22.0% 27.1% 7.4%
Return on capital employed 18.7% 41.9% 7.6%
Asset turnover 0.7x 1.0x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.0x 1.0x 2.0x
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% 0.4% 2.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMMMITWFTV
Debt / assets 37.9% 58.8% 30.2%
Debt / equity 3.6x 3.3x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.6x 1.9x 2.5x
Debt / FCF 5.6x 3.3x 3.7x
Liabilities / assets 89.5% 82.4% 47.7%
Equity / assets 10.5% 17.6% 52.3%
Interest coverage – 14.5x 12.8x
Current ratio 1.4x 1.1x 1.2x
Quick ratio 0.8x 0.7x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.1x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 4.10 8.00 3.30

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMMMITWFTV
Dividend yield 1.8% 2.4% 0.4%
Net buyback yield 3.1% 2.3% 10.7%
Shareholder yield 4.8% 4.7% 11.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) 44.8% 57.4% 10.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) 59.9% 62.8% 6.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.2% 5.5% -48.4%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -21.4% 5.1% -17.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMMMITWFTV
Forward P/E 19.5xFY2026 25.9xFY2026 19.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $8.88FY2026 $10.67FY2026 $3.20FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +10.2%FY2026 +1.7%FY2026 +18.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +16.7% +19.3% -3.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $23.87BFY2026 $16.46BFY2026 $4.63BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -1.8%FY2026 +2.6%FY2026 +11.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +17.6% +11.4% -6.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMMMITWFTV
Held by institutions 74.5% 84.9% 100.0%
Institutions holding 2,208 1,969 803
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.8% +0.8% +2.8%
Institutions buying 914 846 350
Institutions selling 837 750 301
Buyers to sellers 1.09 1.13 1.16

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MMMITWFTV
MMM 1.00 0.56 0.37
ITW 0.56 1.00 0.57
FTV 0.37 0.57 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MMM, ITW and FTV?

3M (MMM) is the largest by market capitalisation: 3M (MMM) $88.87B, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) $79.53B, Fortive (FTV) $18.47B.

Which stock is cheaper, MMM, ITW and FTV?

Illinois Tool Works (ITW) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (3M (MMM) 25.1x, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 24.9x, Fortive (FTV) 34.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Fortive (FTV) is cheapest (3M (MMM) 19.5x, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 25.9x, Fortive (FTV) 19.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Fortive (FTV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: 3M (MMM) +1.7%, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) +4.3%, Fortive (FTV) +5.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Illinois Tool Works (ITW) has the highest net margin (3M (MMM) 14.0%, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 19.4%, Fortive (FTV) 12.4%). On return on invested capital, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) leads (3M (MMM) 22.0%, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 27.1%, Fortive (FTV) 7.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Fortive (FTV) returned the most: 3M (MMM) +2.5%, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) +12.3%, Fortive (FTV) +22.9%. Over five years, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) compounded fastest (3M (MMM) +3.0%/yr, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) +4.4%/yr, Fortive (FTV) -3.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Illinois Tool Works (ITW) has the highest dividend yield: 3M (MMM) 0.02%, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 0.02%, Fortive (FTV) 0.00%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) has been the steadiest (3M (MMM) 25.6%, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 21.3%, Fortive (FTV) 26.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MMM, ITW and FTV?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.