MLM vs CX Stock Comparison

Martin Marietta Materials and Cemex Sab De Cv Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CX Cemex Sab De Cv
$10.18 +4.2% 1M +9.1% 1Y
Market cap
$14.75B
P/E
30.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.04B
Div. yield
–
Cement Basic Materials
4 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Martin Marietta Materials leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Martin Marietta Materials 5, Cemex Sab De Cv 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMLMCXLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $30.32B $14.75B MLM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 12.3x 30.5x MLM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.5x 12.3x CX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +14.8% +9.6% MLM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 36.7% 2.8% MLM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.5% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.8x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -18.1% +9.1% CX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +5.9%/yr +8.7%/yr CX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 28.7% 37.5% MLM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 34/100 43/100 CX

Percentile Scorecard

MLMCX

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMLMCX
Valuation 11 #9 of 10 100 #1 of 10
Growth – –
Profitability 86 #2 of 8 14 #7 of 8
Financial Health 38 #6 of 9 –
Shareholder Returns 0 #8 of 8 14 #7 of 8
Overall 34 43
  • MLM ranked among 10 companies in Construction Materials
  • CX ranked among 10 companies in Construction Materials

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMLMCXSPY
1 month +3.4%+4.2% -1.0%
3 months -9.4%-15.7% +2.9%
6 months -17.6%-17.6% +6.4%
Year to date -18.6%-11.4% +11.4%
1 year -18.1%+9.1% +13.1%
3 years +21.8%+71.4% +79.4%
3 years, per year +6.8%+19.7% +21.5%
5 years +33.0%+51.7% +67.7%
5 years, per year +5.9%+8.7% +10.9%
10 years +182.1%+15.8% +255.2%
10 years, per year +10.9%+1.5% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureMLMCXSPY
Volatility, 1Y 28.7%37.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 31.2%34.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.841.55 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.630.24 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -33.4%-54.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -28.4%-24.9% -2.5%
52-week high $708.11$13.55 $779.14
52-week low $471.33$9.33 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMLMCX
P/E now vs peer median 12.4xmedian 19.7x 30.6xmedian 19.7x
P/S now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 1.8x 0.9xmedian 1.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.6xmedian 9.3x 5.4xmedian 9.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 37.6xmedian 31.6x —median 31.6x
P/B now vs peer median 2.6xmedian 2.3x —median 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.32median 1.85 -1.67median 1.85

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMLMCX
Revenue $6.69B $17.04B
Gross profit $1.88B $5.73B
Operating income $1.38B $1.37B
Net income $2.46B $2.16B
Free cash flow $810.00M –
EPS (diluted) $40.81 $0.33
Cash & equivalents $112.00M –
Total debt $22.09B –
Shares (diluted) 60.20M 1.47B
Enterprise value $29.81B $14.75B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMLMCX
P/E 12.4x 30.6x
P/FCF 37.6x –
P/Operating cash flow 20.0x –
P/S 4.6x 0.9x
P/B 2.6x –
P/Tangible book 2.8x –
EV/EBITDA 17.6x 5.4x
EV/EBIT 26.3x 10.7x
EV/Revenue 5.4x 0.9x
EV/FCF 44.8x –
EV/Operating cash flow 23.9x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.32 -1.67

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMLMCX
Revenue growth (1Y) 14.8% 9.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.1% 1.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 7.8% 12.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 3.4% 2.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 3.2% -6.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 1.3% 1.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 123.2% 14.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 37.3% 33.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 123.9% -68.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 38.8% -18.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -19.7% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 7.5% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -15.9% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 6.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMLMCX
Gross margin 28.2% 33.6%
EBITDA margin 30.9% 15.9%
Operating margin 20.6% 8.1%
Pretax margin 17.4% 5.9%
Net margin 36.7% 2.8%
FCF margin 12.1% –
Operating cash flow margin 22.7% –
Return on equity 21.5% –
Return on assets 11.8% 3.5%
Return on invested capital 6.5% –
Return on capital employed 7.2% 9.7%
Asset turnover 0.3x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.6x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMLMCX
Debt / assets 27.9% –
Debt / equity 0.5x –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.8x –
Debt / FCF 7.3x –
Liabilities / assets 45.8% 33.5%
Equity / assets 54.2% –
Interest coverage 5.9x 1.8x
Current ratio 1.4x 1.8x
Quick ratio 0.7x –
Cash ratio 0.1x –
Altman Z-score 2.96 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMLMCX
Dividend yield 0.7% 1.0%
Net buyback yield 0.7% –
Shareholder yield 1.3% 1.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 8.2% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 24.9% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 4.1% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 6.8% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMLMCX
Forward P/E 27.5xFY2026 12.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $18.47FY2026 $0.83FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +13.0%FY2026 +25.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +17.2% +22.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.04BFY2026 $18.05BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +14.8%FY2026 +11.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +26.6% +8.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMLMCX
Held by institutions 98.5% 37.1%
Institutions holding 1,072 318
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.4% +6.4%
Institutions buying 469 154
Institutions selling 392 100
Buyers to sellers 1.20 1.54

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MLMCX
MLM 1.00 0.48
CX 0.48 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MLM and CX?

Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) $30.32B, Cemex Sab De Cv (CX) $14.75B.

Which stock is cheaper, MLM and CX?

Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) 12.3x, Cemex Sab De Cv (CX) 30.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Cemex Sab De Cv (CX) is cheapest (Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) 27.5x, Cemex Sab De Cv (CX) 12.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) +14.8%, Cemex Sab De Cv (CX) +9.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) has the highest net margin (Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) 36.7%, Cemex Sab De Cv (CX) 2.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Cemex Sab De Cv (CX) returned the most: Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) -18.1%, Cemex Sab De Cv (CX) +9.1%. Over five years, Cemex Sab De Cv (CX) compounded fastest (Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) +5.9%/yr, Cemex Sab De Cv (CX) +8.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) 0.01%, Cemex Sab De Cv (CX) 0.00%. Cemex Sab De Cv (CX) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) has been the steadiest (Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) 28.7%, Cemex Sab De Cv (CX) 37.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do MLM and CX move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.48, a moderate positive relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, MLM and CX?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.