MLKN vs HNI vs ETD Stock Comparison

Millerknoll, Hni and Ethan Allen Interiors Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MLKN Millerknoll, Inc.
$20.76 +3.5% 1M +21.8% 1Y
Market cap
$1.43B
P/E
14.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.81B
Div. yield
–
Furniture Consumer Discretionary
4 wins
HNI Hni Corp
$47.65 +0.9% 1M +6.0% 1Y
Market cap
$3.40B
P/E
791.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.39B
Div. yield
–
Furniture Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
ETD Ethan Allen Interiors Inc
$19.93 -6.4% 1M -28.1% 1Y
Market cap
$501.59M
P/E
12.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$579.49M
Div. yield
–
Furniture Consumer Discretionary
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Ethan Allen Interiors leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Ethan Allen Interiors 4, Millerknoll 4, Hni 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMLKNHNIETDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.43B $3.40B $501.59M HNI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 14.6x 791.6x 12.6x ETD
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 9.9x 12.1x 17.3x MLKN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.2% +70.1% -5.7% HNI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.6% 0.1% 6.9% ETD
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.6% 0.5% — MLKN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.7x 4.4x — MLKN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +21.8% +6.0% -28.1% MLKN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -11.7%/yr +5.1%/yr -2.7%/yr HNI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 48.9% 36.9% 32.7% ETD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 63/100 40/100 71/100 ETD

Percentile Scorecard

MLKNHNIETD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMLKNHNIETD
Valuation 83 #8 of 42 39 #26 of 42 85 #7 of 42
Growth 71 #13 of 42 44 #24 of 42 15 #36 of 42
Profitability 64 #15 of 40 51 #20 of 40 80 #9 of 40
Financial Health 35 #29 of 44 23 #34 of 44 77 #11 of 44
Shareholder Returns 63 #11 of 28 44 #16 of 28 100 #1 of 28
Overall 63 40 71
  • MLKN ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables
  • HNI ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables
  • ETD ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMLKNHNIETDSPY
1 month +3.5%+0.9%-6.4% -0.2%
3 months -12.0%+8.0%-16.3% +3.9%
6 months +21.3%+25.8%-11.2% +8.2%
Year to date +13.6%+13.3%-12.7% +12.9%
1 year +21.8%+6.0%-28.1% +12.3%
3 years -8.2%+45.0%-23.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year -2.8%+13.2%-8.4% +23.3%
5 years -46.3%+28.0%-12.7% +67.9%
5 years, per year -11.7%+5.1%-2.7% +10.9%
10 years -25.5%+17.9%-33.5% +261.1%
10 years, per year -2.9%+1.7%-4.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMLKNHNIETDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 48.9%36.9%32.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 53.6%34.5%36.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.220.870.42 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.450.16-0.86 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.8%-49.1%-47.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -15.2%-9.3%-29.3% -1.2%
52-week high $24.49$52.55$28.19 $779.14
52-week low $13.88$29.25$18.68 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMLKNHNIETD
P/E now vs peer median 14.7xmedian 16.0x 799.0xmedian 16.0x 12.8xmedian 16.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 0.6x 0.8xmedian 0.6x 0.9xmedian 0.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.2xmedian 9.8x 16.4xmedian 9.8x 6.1xmedian 9.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 12.4xmedian 11.9x 40.3xmedian 11.9x 12.1xmedian 11.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.2x 1.9xmedian 1.2x 1.1xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.31median 0.64 -12.03median 0.64 -0.46median 0.64

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMLKNHNIETD
Revenue $3.81B $4.39B $579.49M
Gross profit $1.51B $1.80B $354.77M
Operating income $196.60M $89.10M $45.02M
Net income $101.20M $4.30M $39.88M
Free cash flow $115.50M $85.40M $41.44M
R&D $105.00M – –
EPS (diluted) $1.40 $0.06 $1.56
Cash & equivalents $178.60M $105.00M $73.63M
Total debt $1.31B $1.38B –
Shares (diluted) 70.04M 72.10M 25.58M
Enterprise value $727.44M $2.97B -$1.17M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMLKNHNIETD
P/E 14.7x 799.0x 12.8x
P/FCF 12.4x 40.3x 12.1x
P/Operating cash flow 6.0x 17.1x 9.6x
P/S 0.4x 0.8x 0.9x
P/B 1.1x 1.9x 1.1x
P/Tangible book 1.5x 1.9x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA 6.2x 16.4x 6.1x
EV/EBIT 13.0x 52.8x 8.2x
EV/Revenue 0.7x 1.1x 0.6x
EV/FCF 22.1x 55.1x 8.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 10.7x 23.5x 7.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.31 -12.03 -0.46

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMLKNHNIETD
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.2% 70.1% -5.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -1.0% 25.7% -9.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 3.5% 69.1% -4.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 2.1% 30.6% -9.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 121.4% -58.8% -27.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 20.7% -6.1% -31.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 681.6% -97.1% -22.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 44.0% -60.2% -27.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 724.0% -98.1% -22.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 47.5% -66.4% -27.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 21.3% -10.2% -14.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -12.6% 11.1% -19.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 41.0% -40.2% -17.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -24.9% 18.3% -21.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMLKNHNIETD
Gross margin 39.5% 41.0% 61.2%
EBITDA margin 10.9% 6.5% 10.4%
Operating margin 5.2% 2.0% 7.8%
Pretax margin 3.5% 0.6% 9.2%
Net margin 2.6% 0.1% 6.9%
FCF margin 3.0% 1.9% 7.2%
Operating cash flow margin 6.3% 4.6% 9.1%
Return on equity 7.6% 0.2% 8.4%
Return on assets 2.6% 0.1% 5.5%
Return on invested capital 5.6% 0.5% –
Return on capital employed 5.9% 2.4% 7.9%
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.9x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.4x 46.7x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 1.0% 0.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMLKNHNIETD
Debt / assets 32.7% 28.5% –
Debt / equity 1.0x 0.8x –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.7x 4.4x –
Debt / FCF 11.3x 16.1x –
Liabilities / assets 66.1% 62.5% 34.5%
Equity / assets 33.9% 37.5% 65.5%
Interest coverage 2.9x – 198.3x
Current ratio 1.6x 1.4x 2.1x
Quick ratio 0.8x 0.1x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.1x 0.9x
Altman Z-score 1.82 – 4.00

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMLKNHNIETD
Dividend yield 3.6% 2.9% 22.2%
Net buyback yield 0.7% 0.0% –
Shareholder yield 4.4% 2.9% 22.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMLKNHNIETD
Forward P/E 9.9xFY2026 12.1xFY2026 17.3xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $2.10FY2026 $3.95FY2026 $1.15FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +12.9%FY2026 +14.2%FY2026 -28.6%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +11.4% +28.6% +17.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.72BFY2026 $5.70BFY2026 $533.76MFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY -3.2%FY2026 +100.8%FY2026 -7.9%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +17.4% +2.7% +2.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMLKNHNIETD
Held by institutions 96.5% 88.0% 84.4%
Institutions holding 244 276 217
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.5% +5.7% -2.0%
Institutions buying 121 145 138
Institutions selling 86 88 54
Buyers to sellers 1.41 1.65 2.56

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MLKNHNIETD
MLKN 1.00 0.69 0.39
HNI 0.69 1.00 0.42
ETD 0.39 0.42 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MLKN, HNI and ETD?

Hni (HNI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Millerknoll (MLKN) $1.43B, Hni (HNI) $3.40B, Ethan Allen Interiors (ETD) $501.59M.

Which stock is cheaper, MLKN, HNI and ETD?

Ethan Allen Interiors (ETD) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Millerknoll (MLKN) 14.6x, Hni (HNI) 791.6x, Ethan Allen Interiors (ETD) 12.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Millerknoll (MLKN) is cheapest (Millerknoll (MLKN) 9.9x, Hni (HNI) 12.1x, Ethan Allen Interiors (ETD) 17.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Hni (HNI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Millerknoll (MLKN) +1.2%, Hni (HNI) +70.1%, Ethan Allen Interiors (ETD) -5.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ethan Allen Interiors (ETD) has the highest net margin (Millerknoll (MLKN) 2.6%, Hni (HNI) 0.1%, Ethan Allen Interiors (ETD) 6.9%). On return on invested capital, Millerknoll (MLKN) leads (Millerknoll (MLKN) 5.6%, Hni (HNI) 0.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Millerknoll (MLKN) returned the most: Millerknoll (MLKN) +21.8%, Hni (HNI) +6.0%, Ethan Allen Interiors (ETD) -28.1%. Over five years, Hni (HNI) compounded fastest (Millerknoll (MLKN) -11.7%/yr, Hni (HNI) +5.1%/yr, Ethan Allen Interiors (ETD) -2.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ethan Allen Interiors (ETD) has been the steadiest (Millerknoll (MLKN) 48.9%, Hni (HNI) 36.9%, Ethan Allen Interiors (ETD) 32.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MLKN, HNI and ETD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ethan Allen Interiors (ETD) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.