MLKMF vs WNW Stock Comparison

Waldencast and Meiwu Technology Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MLKMF Waldencast plc
$0.85 -17.5% 1M -55.7% 1Y
Market cap
$96.96M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Cosmetics Consumer Staples
4 wins

Head to Head

4 decided of 12

Waldencast leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Waldencast 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMLKMFWNWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $96.96M $46.20M MLKMF
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — -2.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -55.7% -98.9% MLKMF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -38.6%/yr -90.3%/yr MLKMF
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 100.6% 239.2% MLKMF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — — –

Percentile Scorecard

MLKMFWNW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMLKMFWNW
Valuation – 65 #9 of 24
Growth – –
Profitability – –
Financial Health 77 #7 of 27 100 #1 of 27
Shareholder Returns – –
Overall – –
  • MLKMF ranked among 30 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • WNW ranked among 30 companies in Household and Personal Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMLKMFWNWSPY
1 month -17.5%-17.1% -0.8%
3 months -50.6%-18.7% +3.5%
6 months +10.4%-37.0% +7.0%
Year to date -54.8%-98.5% +12.2%
1 year -55.7%-98.9% +13.0%
3 years -90.4%-100.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year -54.2%-93.2% +23.1%
5 years -91.2%-100.0% +68.6%
5 years, per year -38.6%-90.3% +11.0%

Risk

MeasureMLKMFWNWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 100.6%239.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 88.2%284.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.341.10 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.55-0.41 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -93.5%-100.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -72.4%-99.0% -1.8%
52-week high $3.08$215.00 $779.14
52-week low $0.75$2.06 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMLKMFWNW
P/E now vs peer median —median 14.1x -2.5xmedian 14.1x
P/S now vs peer median —median 6.5x 6.5xmedian 6.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 11.5x —median 11.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 5.7x 5.1xmedian 5.7x
P/B now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 1.0x 0.9xmedian 1.0x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.85 —median 0.85

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMLKMFWNW
Cash & equivalents $7.82M $17.88M
Total debt $631.43M –
Shares (diluted) 114.07M 22.10M
Enterprise value $34.99M -$51.52M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMLKMFWNW
P/E – -2.5x
P/FCF – 5.1x
P/Operating cash flow – –
P/S – 6.5x
P/B 0.2x 0.9x
P/Tangible book 0.3x 2.2x
EV/EBITDA – –
EV/EBIT – –
EV/Revenue – –
EV/FCF – –
EV/Operating cash flow – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMLKMFWNW
Revenue growth (1Y) – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – –
Net income growth (1Y) – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – –
EPS growth (1Y) – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMLKMFWNW
Gross margin – –
EBITDA margin – –
Operating margin – –
Pretax margin – –
Net margin – –
FCF margin – –
Operating cash flow margin – –
Return on equity – –
Return on assets – –
Return on invested capital – –
Return on capital employed – –
Asset turnover – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – –
Stock comp / revenue – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMLKMFWNW
Debt / assets 23.1% –
Debt / equity 0.4x –
Net debt / EBITDA – –
Debt / FCF – –
Liabilities / assets 39.5% –
Equity / assets 60.5% 100.0%
Interest coverage – –
Current ratio 4.8x 15.8x
Quick ratio 0.1x 14.3x
Cash ratio 0.1x 13.6x
Altman Z-score – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMLKMFWNW
Dividend yield – –
Net buyback yield – –
Shareholder yield – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMLKMFWNW
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.51FY2026 –
Revenue, next fiscal year $272.64MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +0.2%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +10.6% –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MLKMFWNW
MLKMF 1.00 -0.04
WNW -0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MLKMF and WNW?

Waldencast (MLKMF) is the largest by market capitalisation: Waldencast (MLKMF) $96.96M, Meiwu Technology (WNW) $46.20M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Waldencast (MLKMF) returned the most: Waldencast (MLKMF) -55.7%, Meiwu Technology (WNW) -98.9%. Over five years, Waldencast (MLKMF) compounded fastest (Waldencast (MLKMF) -38.6%/yr, Meiwu Technology (WNW) -90.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Waldencast (MLKMF) has been the steadiest (Waldencast (MLKMF) 100.6%, Meiwu Technology (WNW) 239.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do MLKMF and WNW move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of -0.04, a negative relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, MLKMF and WNW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Waldencast (MLKMF) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.