MKSI vs LRCX vs CAMT Stock Comparison

Mks, Lam Research and Camtek Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MKSI Mks Inc
$196.54 -29.6% 1M +36.8% 1Y
Market cap
$13.29B
P/E
30.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.35B
Div. yield
0.49%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
4 wins
LRCX Lam Research Corp
$227.56 -34.5% 1M +44.5% 1Y
Market cap
$284.26B
P/E
33.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$26.13B
Div. yield
0.49%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
8 wins
CAMT Camtek Ltd
$108.25 -34.5% 1M -12.6% 1Y
Market cap
$4.96B
P/E
131.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$509.02M
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Lam Research leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Lam Research 8, Mks 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMKSILRCXCAMTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $13.29B $284.26B $4.96B LRCX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 30.2x 33.7x 131.3x MKSI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.6x 22.5x 31.3x MKSI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +16.3% +33.4% +7.9% LRCX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.1% 32.3% 7.4% LRCX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.9% 49.6% — LRCX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.2x -0.4x — LRCX
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.49% 0.49% 0.00% MKSI
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +36.8% +44.5% -12.6% LRCX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +5.0%/yr +31.4%/yr +21.9%/yr LRCX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 62.3% 66.3% 72.1% MKSI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 55/100 67/100 44/100 LRCX

Percentile Scorecard

MKSILRCXCAMT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMKSILRCXCAMT
Valuation 76 #23 of 94 51 #47 of 94 40 #57 of 94
Growth 71 #27 of 92 84 #16 of 92 30 #65 of 92
Profitability 63 #34 of 90 96 #5 of 90 53 #43 of 90
Financial Health 1 #100 of 101 45 #56 of 101 53 #48 of 101
Shareholder Returns 62 #29 of 74 60 #30 of 74 –
Overall 55 67 44
  • MKSI ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • LRCX ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • CAMT ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMKSILRCXCAMTSPY
1 month -29.6%-34.5%-34.5% -2.3%
3 months -36.6%-22.8%-22.6% -0.7%
6 months -32.6%-12.0%-40.8% +4.8%
Year to date +23.0%+32.9%+1.8% +10.3%
1 year +36.8%+44.5%-12.6% +10.3%
3 years +187.0%+258.9%+91.7% +73.0%
3 years, per year +42.2%+53.1%+24.2% +20.1%
5 years +27.5%+291.4%+169.1% +61.9%
5 years, per year +5.0%+31.4%+21.9% +10.1%
10 years +297.5%+2,272.9%+3,632.8% +258.6%
10 years, per year +14.8%+37.3%+43.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureMKSILRCXCAMTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 62.3%66.3%72.1% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 66.4%65.9%76.0% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.863.302.92 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.590.67-0.17 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.5%-56.8%-63.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -55.8%-47.5%-47.8% -3.5%
52-week high $444.80$433.33$207.46 $779.14
52-week low $137.20$139.59$94.40 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMKSILRCXCAMT
P/E now vs peer median 30.2xmedian 41.3x 33.7xmedian 41.3x 131.3xmedian 41.3x
P/S now vs peer median 3.1xmedian 6.6x 10.9xmedian 6.6x 9.7xmedian 6.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.9xmedian 26.2x 27.7xmedian 26.2x —median 26.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 29.2xmedian 37.7x 43.5xmedian 37.7x —median 37.7x
P/B now vs peer median 4.4xmedian 4.3x 20.4xmedian 4.3x 7.0xmedian 4.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.98median 1.81 1.08median 1.81 -5.91median 1.81

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMKSILRCXCAMT
Revenue $4.35B $26.13B $509.02M
Gross profit $2.04B $13.34B $254.77M
Operating income $681.00M $9.65B $118.02M
Net income $439.00M $8.45B $56.14M
Free cash flow $455.00M $6.54B –
R&D $310.00M $2.47B $57.52M
EPS (diluted) $6.05 $6.73 $0.76
Cash & equivalents $611.00M $7.44B $215.23M
Total debt $3.94B $3.74B –
Shares (diluted) 72.70M 1.26B 49.37M
Enterprise value $10.73B $260.31B $3.85B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMKSILRCXCAMT
P/E 30.2x 33.7x 131.3x
P/FCF 29.2x 43.5x –
P/Operating cash flow 20.9x 37.5x –
P/S 3.1x 10.9x 9.7x
P/B 4.4x 20.4x 7.0x
P/Tangible book 13.7x 20.4x 7.2x
EV/EBITDA 15.9x 27.7x –
EV/EBIT 24.4x 29.1x 39.5x
EV/Revenue 3.8x 10.7x 9.2x
EV/FCF 36.5x 42.9x –
EV/Operating cash flow 26.2x 37.0x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.98 1.08 -5.91

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMKSILRCXCAMT
Revenue growth (1Y) 16.3% 33.4% 7.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.2% 18.2% 17.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 15.4% 38.1% 7.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 6.7% 23.4% 19.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 33.5% 49.3% -6.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 35.4% 29.0% 18.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 64.4% 45.4% -65.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 31.0% 28.6% -16.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 52.8% 47.0% -71.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 30.7% 31.1% -22.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -1.6% 18.7% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 20.7% 15.3% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -13.3% 17.8% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 22.9% 13.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMKSILRCXCAMT
Gross margin 47.0% 51.1% 50.1%
EBITDA margin 24.0% 38.7% –
Operating margin 15.7% 37.0% 23.2%
Pretax margin 11.2% 37.2% 9.2%
Net margin 10.1% 32.3% 7.4%
FCF margin 10.5% 25.0% –
Operating cash flow margin 14.6% 29.0% –
Return on equity 15.2% 64.1% 8.1%
Return on assets 5.0% 33.9% 4.3%
Return on invested capital 8.9% 49.6% –
Return on capital employed 10.6% 54.8% 9.9%
Asset turnover 0.5x 1.0x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x 0.9x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.3% 1.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMKSILRCXCAMT
Debt / assets 44.1% 14.2% –
Debt / equity 1.3x 0.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA 3.2x -0.4x –
Debt / FCF 8.7x 0.6x –
Liabilities / assets 66.6% 47.2% 47.0%
Equity / assets 33.4% 52.8% 53.0%
Interest coverage 3.7x – –
Current ratio 1.1x 2.5x 7.4x
Quick ratio 0.6x 1.8x 3.6x
Cash ratio 0.3x 1.0x 2.4x
Altman Z-score 2.27 18.38 6.58

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMKSILRCXCAMT
Dividend yield 0.5% 0.5% –
Net buyback yield – 1.3% –
Shareholder yield 0.5% 1.8% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 14.4% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 13.8% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 6.8% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 3.4% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMKSILRCXCAMT
Forward P/E 14.6xFY2026 22.5xFY2027 31.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $13.48FY2026 $10.12FY2027 $3.46FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +71.1%FY2026 +73.9%FY2027 +6.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +34.9% +12.6% +53.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.43BFY2026 $32.96BFY2027 $568.64MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +38.1%FY2026 +41.9%FY2027 +14.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +8.0% +25.0% +42.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMKSILRCXCAMT
Held by institutions 100.0% 85.6% 41.7%
Institutions holding 777 3,134 235
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.8% +6.2% -12.5%
Institutions buying 455 1,698 126
Institutions selling 253 1,163 68
Buyers to sellers 1.80 1.46 1.85

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MKSILRCXCAMT
MKSI 1.00 0.84 0.70
LRCX 0.84 1.00 0.74
CAMT 0.70 0.74 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MKSI, LRCX and CAMT?

Lam Research (LRCX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Mks (MKSI) $13.29B, Lam Research (LRCX) $284.26B, Camtek (CAMT) $4.96B.

Which stock is cheaper, MKSI, LRCX and CAMT?

Mks (MKSI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Mks (MKSI) 30.2x, Lam Research (LRCX) 33.7x, Camtek (CAMT) 131.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Mks (MKSI) is cheapest (Mks (MKSI) 14.6x, Lam Research (LRCX) 22.5x, Camtek (CAMT) 31.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Lam Research (LRCX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Mks (MKSI) +16.3%, Lam Research (LRCX) +33.4%, Camtek (CAMT) +7.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lam Research (LRCX) has the highest net margin (Mks (MKSI) 10.1%, Lam Research (LRCX) 32.3%, Camtek (CAMT) 7.4%). On return on invested capital, Lam Research (LRCX) leads (Mks (MKSI) 8.9%, Lam Research (LRCX) 49.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lam Research (LRCX) returned the most: Mks (MKSI) +36.8%, Lam Research (LRCX) +44.5%, Camtek (CAMT) -12.6%. Over five years, Lam Research (LRCX) compounded fastest (Mks (MKSI) +5.0%/yr, Lam Research (LRCX) +31.4%/yr, Camtek (CAMT) +21.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Mks (MKSI) has the highest dividend yield: Mks (MKSI) 0.49%, Lam Research (LRCX) 0.49%, Camtek (CAMT) 0.00%. Camtek (CAMT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Mks (MKSI) has been the steadiest (Mks (MKSI) 62.3%, Lam Research (LRCX) 66.3%, Camtek (CAMT) 72.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MKSI, LRCX and CAMT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lam Research (LRCX) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.