MKL vs CB vs FRFHF Stock Comparison

Markel, Chubb and Fairfax Financial Holdings Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MKL Markel Group Inc.
$1,859.36 +7.6% 1M -1.3% 1Y
Market cap
$23.14B
P/E
10.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$15.51B
Div. yield
–
Property and Casualty Insurance Financial Services
1 win
CB Chubb Ltd
$356.26 +6.9% 1M +26.5% 1Y
Market cap
$138.28B
P/E
12.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$61.80B
Div. yield
0.01%
Property and Casualty Insurance Financial Services
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Chubb leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Chubb 5, Fairfax Financial Holdings 5, Markel 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMKLCBFRFHFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $23.14B $138.28B $37.67B CB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 10.1x 12.4x 7.5x FRFHF
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 18.7x 11.5x 9.6x FRFHF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.5% +8.0% +10.0% FRFHF
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 14.7% 18.1% 3.7% CB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.6% -9.6% — MKL
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.01% FRFHF
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -1.3% +26.5% +5.2% CB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +7.0%/yr +12.7%/yr +33.8%/yr FRFHF
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 19.9% 19.5% 22.6% CB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 45/100 55/100 41/100 CB

Percentile Scorecard

MKLCBFRFHF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMKLCBFRFHF
Valuation 67 #40 of 119 38 #74 of 119 41 #71 of 119
Growth 12 #101 of 114 59 #47 of 114 39 #70 of 114
Profitability 56 #49 of 110 60 #45 of 110 28 #79 of 110
Financial Health 64 #40 of 110 57 #48 of 110 79 #24 of 110
Shareholder Returns 27 #78 of 106 60 #43 of 106 19 #86 of 106
Overall 45 55 41
  • MKL ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • CB ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • FRFHF ranked among 126 companies in Insurance

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMKLCBFRFHFSPY
1 month +7.6%+6.9%+10.9% -0.2%
3 months -8.8%-2.0%+0.0% +3.9%
6 months -2.6%+7.8%+2.0% +8.2%
Year to date -13.5%+14.1%-8.3% +12.9%
1 year -1.3%+26.5%+5.2% +12.3%
3 years +29.8%+70.8%+116.2% +87.4%
3 years, per year +9.1%+19.6%+29.3% +23.3%
5 years +40.3%+81.7%+327.7% +67.9%
5 years, per year +7.0%+12.7%+33.8% +10.9%
10 years +111.5%+180.5%+232.6% +261.1%
10 years, per year +7.8%+10.9%+12.8% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMKLCBFRFHFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 19.9%19.5%22.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 21.2%18.0%23.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.02-0.410.24 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.061.360.23 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -28.9%-20.0%-20.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -15.2%-2.1%-8.7% -1.2%
52-week high $2,191.90$364.00$1,916.53 $779.14
52-week low $1,714.26$275.58$1,529.40 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMKLCBFRFHF
P/E now vs peer median 10.2xmedian 10.5x 12.3xmedian 10.5x 7.5xmedian 10.5x
P/S now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 1.4x 2.2xmedian 1.4x 0.4xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 7.6x —median 7.6x 5.9xmedian 7.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 10.9xmedian 8.5x 8.9xmedian 8.5x -2,042xmedian 8.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 1.5x 1.7xmedian 1.5x 1.7xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median 1.19median 0.53 0.46median 0.53 5.60median 0.53

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMKLCBFRFHF
Revenue $15.51B $61.80B $134.78B
Gross profit $10.63B $35.75B –
Operating income $3.09B -$11.77B –
Net income $2.32B $11.51B $5.03B
Free cash flow $2.12B $15.38B -$26.00M
EPS (diluted) $181.44 $28.59 $217.11
Cash & equivalents $3.42B $2.75B –
Total debt $4.37B $18.54B –
Shares (diluted) 12.59M 391.25M 23.08M
Enterprise value -$43.53B $84.86B $37.67B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMKLCBFRFHF
P/E 10.2x 12.3x 7.5x
P/FCF 10.9x 8.9x -2,042x
P/Operating cash flow 9.9x 8.9x -1,629x
P/S 1.5x 2.2x 0.4x
P/B 1.2x 1.7x 1.7x
P/Tangible book 1.3x 1.8x 1.7x
EV/EBITDA – – 5.9x
EV/EBIT 3.4x -12.1x 6.2x
EV/Revenue 0.7x 2.3x 0.4x
EV/FCF 5.0x 9.2x -2,042x
EV/Operating cash flow 4.5x 9.2x -1,629x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.19 0.46 5.60

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMKLCBFRFHF
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.5% 8.0% 10.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.0% 10.0% 75.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 7.4% 19.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 16.1% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -7.9% 25.7% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 2.8% 10.6% –
Net income growth (1Y) 0.2% 21.5% 0.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 4.0% 25.7% -1.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 5.5% 25.5% 5.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 8.6% 27.1% 1.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 2.7% 9.8% -100.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -6.0% 12.3% 73.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 3.4% 9.8% -100.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -6.3% 12.3% 75.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMKLCBFRFHF
Gross margin 68.5% 57.8% –
EBITDA margin – – 6.7%
Operating margin 19.9% -19.0% –
Pretax margin 19.1% 23.1% 4.7%
Net margin 14.7% 18.1% 3.7%
FCF margin 13.7% 24.9% 0.0%
Operating cash flow margin 15.0% 24.9% 0.0%
Return on equity 12.5% 14.3% 24.7%
Return on assets 3.3% 4.1% 7.0%
Return on invested capital 10.6% -9.6% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.2x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.0x 1.3x 0.0x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMKLCBFRFHF
Debt / assets 6.1% 6.6% –
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF 2.1x 1.2x –
Liabilities / assets 73.3% 71.3% 71.6%
Equity / assets 26.7% 28.7% 28.4%
Interest coverage 15.2x -14.7x 10.0x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMKLCBFRFHF
Dividend yield – 1.1% 0.9%
Net buyback yield 2.3% 3.0% 0.0%
Shareholder yield 2.3% 4.1% 0.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 13.3% 10.7%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 10.0% -2,077%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 4.4% -18.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 3.5% 1.9%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMKLCBFRFHF
Forward P/E 18.7xFY2026 11.5xFY2026 9.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $99.52FY2026 $30.86FY2026 $182.77FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -13.0%FY2026 +24.5%FY2026 -14.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +7.3% +2.1% +10.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $15.96BFY2026 $61.37BFY2026 $33.74BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -3.8%FY2026 +11.9%FY2026 +0.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.4% +6.9% -5.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMKLCBFRFHF
Held by institutions 76.8% 89.7% –
Institutions holding 926 2,149 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.2% -0.8% –
Institutions buying 424 1,014 –
Institutions selling 315 803 –
Buyers to sellers 1.35 1.26 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MKLCBFRFHF
MKL 1.00 0.54 0.28
CB 0.54 1.00 0.24
FRFHF 0.28 0.24 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MKL, CB and FRFHF?

Chubb (CB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Markel (MKL) $23.14B, Chubb (CB) $138.28B, Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) $37.67B.

Which stock is cheaper, MKL, CB and FRFHF?

Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Markel (MKL) 10.1x, Chubb (CB) 12.4x, Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) 7.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) is cheapest (Markel (MKL) 18.7x, Chubb (CB) 11.5x, Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) 9.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Markel (MKL) +3.5%, Chubb (CB) +8.0%, Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) +10.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Chubb (CB) has the highest net margin (Markel (MKL) 14.7%, Chubb (CB) 18.1%, Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) 3.7%). On return on invested capital, Markel (MKL) leads (Markel (MKL) 10.6%, Chubb (CB) -9.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Chubb (CB) returned the most: Markel (MKL) -1.3%, Chubb (CB) +26.5%, Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) +5.2%. Over five years, Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) compounded fastest (Markel (MKL) +7.0%/yr, Chubb (CB) +12.7%/yr, Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) +33.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) has the highest dividend yield: Markel (MKL) 0.00%, Chubb (CB) 0.01%, Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) 0.01%. Markel (MKL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Chubb (CB) has been the steadiest (Markel (MKL) 19.9%, Chubb (CB) 19.5%, Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) 22.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MKL, CB and FRFHF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Chubb (CB) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.