MH vs NWSA vs ZD Stock Comparison

McGraw Hill, News and Ziff Davis Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MH McGraw Hill, Inc.
$14.65 +6.6% 1M +16.1% 1Y
Market cap
$2.77B
P/E
29.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.12B
Div. yield
–
Publishing Communication Services
2 wins
NWSA News Corp
$30.74 +9.3% 1M +16.4% 1Y
Market cap
$17.01B
P/E
29.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.03B
Div. yield
–
Publishing Communication Services
4 wins
ZD Ziff Davis, Inc.
$57.89 +2.0% 1M +51.5% 1Y
Market cap
$2.10B
P/E
3.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.32B
Div. yield
–
Publishing Communication Services
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Ziff Davis leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Ziff Davis 5, News 4, McGraw Hill 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMHNWSAZDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.77B $17.01B $2.10B NWSA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 29.9x 29.7x 3.3x ZD
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 7.0x 24.6x 10.6x MH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +0.1% +6.8% -0.7% NWSA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.4% 6.3% 48.6% ZD
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.9% 6.6% 2.6% MH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.9x -0.1x -2.6x ZD
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +16.1% +16.4% +51.5% ZD
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +5.0%/yr -14.4%/yr NWSA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 59.9% 26.2% 56.1% NWSA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 52/100 69/100 89/100 ZD

Percentile Scorecard

MHNWSAZD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMHNWSAZD
Valuation 76 #14 of 54 57 #24 of 54 96 #3 of 54
Growth 71 #14 of 45 93 #4 of 45 91 #5 of 45
Profitability 91 #5 of 43 79 #10 of 43 69 #14 of 43
Financial Health 21 #49 of 62 87 #9 of 62 89 #8 of 62
Shareholder Returns 4 #25 of 26 32 #18 of 26 100 #1 of 26
Overall 52 69 89
  • MH ranked among 63 companies in Advertising and Media
  • NWSA ranked among 63 companies in Advertising and Media
  • ZD ranked among 63 companies in Advertising and Media

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMHNWSAZDSPY
1 month +6.6%+9.3%+2.0% -1.0%
3 months +48.0%+14.9%+12.2% +2.9%
6 months +12.8%+17.3%+24.4% +6.4%
Year to date -11.2%+17.7%+64.7% +11.4%
1 year +16.1%+16.4%+51.5% +13.1%
3 years —+43.2%-4.5% +79.4%
3 years, per year —+12.7%-1.5% +21.5%
5 years —+27.7%-54.0% +67.7%
5 years, per year —+5.0%-14.4% +10.9%
10 years —+129.2%-1.3% +255.2%
10 years, per year —+8.7%-0.1% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureMHNWSAZDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 59.9%26.2%56.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 54.0%27.6%41.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.150.190.59 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.270.630.92 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -49.4%-38.7%-80.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -18.6%-1.4%-2.1% -2.5%
52-week high $17.99$31.19$59.13 $779.14
52-week low $9.11$22.40$26.51 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMHNWSAZD
P/E now vs peer median 30.2xmedian 18.8x 29.9xmedian 18.8x 3.3xmedian 18.8x
P/S now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 0.7x 1.9xmedian 0.7x 1.5xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.6xmedian 11.1x 11.1xmedian 11.1x 4.5xmedian 11.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 8.3xmedian 9.4x 21.1xmedian 9.4x 6.4xmedian 9.4x
P/B now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 1.6x 1.9xmedian 1.6x 0.9xmedian 1.6x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.44 0.51median 0.44 0.03median 0.44

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMHNWSAZD
Revenue $2.12B $9.03B $1.32B
Gross profit $1.73B – $1.12B
Operating income $294.84M – $72.68M
Net income $92.68M $743.00M $643.49M
Free cash flow $335.92M $811.00M $316.73M
R&D – – $57.65M
EPS (diluted) $0.48 $1.03 $17.69
Cash & equivalents $193.64M $2.10B $1.61B
Total debt $2.57B $1.99B $867.64M
Shares (diluted) 191.31M 558.40M 36.38M
Enterprise value $1.34B $8.49B -$1.10B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMHNWSAZD
P/E 30.2x 29.9x 3.3x
P/FCF 8.3x 21.1x 6.4x
P/Operating cash flow 6.5x 13.8x 4.5x
P/S 1.3x 1.9x 1.5x
P/B 3.6x 1.9x 0.9x
P/Tangible book -7.3x 2.3x 1.0x
EV/EBITDA 8.6x 11.1x 4.5x
EV/EBIT 17.6x 16.3x 17.7x
EV/Revenue 2.4x 1.9x 1.0x
EV/FCF 15.4x 21.0x 4.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 12.1x 13.7x 2.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.51 0.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMHNWSAZD
Revenue growth (1Y) 0.1% 6.8% -0.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 4.1% -1.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 2.1% – -2.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – -1.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) -9.9% – -6.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – -27.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 222.1% -44.6% 873.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 58.4% 89.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 206.4% -50.4% 1,055%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 58.6% 106.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -22.5% 26.5% 31.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 16.8% 14.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -30.2% 42.0% 35.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 23.6% 18.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMHNWSAZD
Gross margin 81.7% – 84.9%
EBITDA margin 28.6% 17.0% 21.5%
Operating margin 13.9% – 5.5%
Pretax margin 3.5% 11.6% -1.9%
Net margin 4.4% 6.3% 48.6%
FCF margin 15.9% 9.0% 23.9%
Operating cash flow margin 20.2% 13.7% 33.8%
Return on equity 12.2% 8.0% 33.5%
Return on assets 1.7% 4.8% 17.9%
Return on invested capital 8.9% 6.6% 2.6%
Return on capital employed 6.9% 8.2% 2.7%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.6x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 4.6x 1.7x 0.7x
Stock comp / revenue 1.8% – 3.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMHNWSAZD
Debt / assets 47.9% 12.8% 21.7%
Debt / equity 3.3x 0.2x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.9x -0.1x -2.6x
Debt / FCF 7.7x 2.5x 2.7x
Liabilities / assets 85.3% 40.6% 44.0%
Equity / assets 14.7% 59.4% 56.0%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 0.8x 1.6x 2.2x
Quick ratio 0.5x 1.4x 2.1x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.8x 1.7x
Altman Z-score 0.57 2.53 2.07

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMHNWSAZD
Dividend yield – 0.7% –
Net buyback yield -14.1% 3.7% 13.6%
Shareholder yield -14.1% 4.4% 13.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMHNWSAZD
Forward P/E 7.0xFY2026 24.6xFY2027 10.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.08FY2026 $1.25FY2027 $5.44FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +2.0%FY2026 +5.9%FY2027 -17.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +2.4% +30.4% +4.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.09BFY2026 $9.16BFY2027 $1.15BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -0.5%FY2026 +1.4%FY2027 -20.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +10.5% +4.1% +0.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMHNWSAZD
Held by institutions 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 111 636 267
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.3% -3.3% -2.6%
Institutions buying 60 344 116
Institutions selling 36 189 106
Buyers to sellers 1.67 1.82 1.09

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MHNWSAZD
MH 1.00 0.26 0.14
NWSA 0.26 1.00 0.16
ZD 0.14 0.16 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MH, NWSA and ZD?

News (NWSA) is the largest by market capitalisation: McGraw Hill (MH) $2.77B, News (NWSA) $17.01B, Ziff Davis (ZD) $2.10B.

Which stock is cheaper, MH, NWSA and ZD?

Ziff Davis (ZD) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (McGraw Hill (MH) 29.9x, News (NWSA) 29.7x, Ziff Davis (ZD) 3.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, McGraw Hill (MH) is cheapest (McGraw Hill (MH) 7.0x, News (NWSA) 24.6x, Ziff Davis (ZD) 10.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

News (NWSA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: McGraw Hill (MH) +0.1%, News (NWSA) +6.8%, Ziff Davis (ZD) -0.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ziff Davis (ZD) has the highest net margin (McGraw Hill (MH) 4.4%, News (NWSA) 6.3%, Ziff Davis (ZD) 48.6%). On return on invested capital, McGraw Hill (MH) leads (McGraw Hill (MH) 8.9%, News (NWSA) 6.6%, Ziff Davis (ZD) 2.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ziff Davis (ZD) returned the most: McGraw Hill (MH) +16.1%, News (NWSA) +16.4%, Ziff Davis (ZD) +51.5%. Over five years, News (NWSA) compounded fastest (News (NWSA) +5.0%/yr, Ziff Davis (ZD) -14.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, News (NWSA) has been the steadiest (McGraw Hill (MH) 59.9%, News (NWSA) 26.2%, Ziff Davis (ZD) 56.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MH, NWSA and ZD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ziff Davis (ZD) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.