METC vs HCC vs ARLP Stock Comparison

Ramaco Resources, Warrior Met Coal and Alliance Resource Partners Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Warrior Met Coal leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Warrior Met Coal 8, Alliance Resource Partners 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMETCHCCARLPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $478.27M $4.41B $3.41B HCC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -7.7x 20.1x 5.2x ARLP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 12.6x 10.3x ARLP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -17.7% +37.5% -1.9% HCC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -12.0% 13.0% — HCC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -6.9% 9.2% — HCC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 16.8x -0.4x — HCC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -77.4% +35.6% +11.2% HCC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -13.6%/yr +29.1%/yr +17.3%/yr HCC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 85.1% 51.1% 21.0% ARLP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 45/100 84/100 67/100 HCC

Percentile Scorecard

METCHCCARLP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMETCHCCARLP
Valuation 41 #14 of 23 73 #7 of 23 82 #5 of 23
Growth 10 #19 of 21 90 #3 of 21 70 #7 of 21
Profitability 59 #8 of 18 88 #3 of 18 94 #2 of 18
Financial Health 14 #19 of 22 86 #4 of 22 24 #17 of 22
Shareholder Returns 100 #1 of 10 – –
Overall 45 84 67
  • METC ranked among 25 companies in Coal and Uranium
  • HCC ranked among 25 companies in Coal and Uranium
  • ARLP ranked among 25 companies in Coal and Uranium

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMETCHCCARLPSPY
1 month -15.0%-2.4%+6.1% -0.2%
3 months -21.3%+10.5%+3.0% +3.9%
6 months -47.3%-2.4%+0.8% +8.2%
Year to date -57.4%-0.9%+14.9% +12.9%
1 year -77.4%+35.6%+11.2% +12.3%
3 years -35.8%+81.5%+18.7% +87.4%
3 years, per year -13.7%+22.0%+5.9% +23.3%
5 years -51.7%+258.0%+122.3% +67.9%
5 years, per year -13.6%+29.1%+17.3% +10.9%
10 years ——+13.5% +261.1%
10 years, per year ——+1.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMETCHCCARLPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 85.1%51.1%21.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 92.0%46.8%20.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.340.41-0.13 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.910.700.53 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -87.3%-45.6%-35.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -77.4%-20.8%-8.0% -1.2%
52-week high $33.97$110.28$28.99 $779.14
52-week low $6.91$64.22$23.10 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMETCHCCARLP
P/E now vs peer median -8.0xmedian 28.4x 21.0xmedian 28.4x 5.2xmedian 28.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 7.3x 2.7xmedian 7.3x 1.6xmedian 7.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 64.9xmedian 29.2x 10.1xmedian 29.2x —median 29.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -4.3xmedian 11.0x -101.0xmedian 11.0x 8.8xmedian 11.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 1.2x 2.0xmedian 1.2x 1.7xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.21median 50.46 -0.94median 50.46 -1.38median 50.46

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMETCHCCARLP
Revenue $515.42M $1.68B $2.21B
Gross profit $69.82M $540.14M –
Operating income -$72.64M $229.26M $643.77M
Net income -$61.75M $219.33M –
Free cash flow -$114.19M -$45.68M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.96 $4.15 $5.10
Cash & equivalents $282.54M $302.35M $84.81M
Total debt $452.81M $154.59M –
Shares (diluted) 64.59M 52.87M 128.66M
Enterprise value -$793.66M $3.11B $3.41B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMETCHCCARLP
P/E -8.0x 21.0x 5.2x
P/FCF -4.3x -101.0x 8.8x
P/Operating cash flow -11.5x 15.3x 5.2x
P/S 0.9x 2.7x 1.6x
P/B 1.3x 2.0x 1.7x
P/Tangible book 1.3x 2.0x 1.7x
EV/EBITDA 64.9x 10.1x –
EV/EBIT -9.0x 19.4x –
EV/Revenue 1.3x 2.6x 1.6x
EV/FCF -5.7x -97.3x –
EV/Operating cash flow -15.5x 14.8x 5.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.21 -0.94 -1.38

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMETCHCCARLP
Revenue growth (1Y) -17.7% 37.5% -1.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -3.6% 1.1% -5.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -34.6% 86.2% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -28.5% -11.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -305.3% 808.1% 112.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -40.1% -24.9% -6.1%
Net income growth (1Y) -211.7% 443.7% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -41.5% -22.0% –
EPS growth (1Y) -152.3% 441.1% 167.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -38.3% -22.4% -3.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -156.4% 82.8% -3.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -32.6% -26.5% -12.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -772.6% 83.3% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -131.8% -28.5% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMETCHCCARLP
Gross margin 13.5% 32.1% –
EBITDA margin 2.0% 26.3% –
Operating margin -14.1% 13.6% –
Pretax margin -14.8% 13.6% –
Net margin -12.0% 13.0% –
FCF margin -22.2% -2.7% –
Operating cash flow margin -8.2% 17.9% 29.7%
Return on equity -15.2% 9.8% 16.7%
Return on assets -5.8% 7.7% 10.2%
Return on invested capital -6.9% 9.2% –
Return on capital employed -7.7% 8.7% –
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.6x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x 1.4x –
Stock comp / revenue 3.9% 1.3% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMETCHCCARLP
Debt / assets 44.2% 5.3% –
Debt / equity 1.2x 0.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA 16.8x -0.4x –
Debt / FCF -4.0x -3.4x –
Liabilities / assets 63.3% 21.0% 38.8%
Equity / assets 36.7% 79.0% 61.2%
Interest coverage -185.8x 17.1x –
Current ratio 4.2x 3.9x 1.4x
Quick ratio 3.2x 2.5x –
Cash ratio 2.6x 1.4x –
Altman Z-score 1.08 6.64 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMETCHCCARLP
Dividend yield – 0.4% 9.0%
Net buyback yield 13.6% – –
Shareholder yield 13.6% 0.4% 9.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMETCHCCARLP
Forward P/E – 12.6xFY2026 10.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.91FY2026 $6.91FY2026 $2.59FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +533.9%FY2026 +7.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +35.0% +7.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $535.87MFY2026 $2.11BFY2026 $2.37BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -0.1%FY2026 +60.9%FY2026 +8.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +37.3% +4.2% -8.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMETCHCCARLP
Held by institutions 70.2% 96.7% 15.2%
Institutions holding 200 345 171
Change in shares held, QoQ -5.7% +3.1% -11.7%
Institutions buying 106 188 74
Institutions selling 48 114 40
Buyers to sellers 2.21 1.65 1.85

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

METCHCCARLP
METC 1.00 0.52 0.26
HCC 0.52 1.00 0.37
ARLP 0.26 0.37 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, METC, HCC and ARLP?

Warrior Met Coal (HCC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ramaco Resources (METC) $478.27M, Warrior Met Coal (HCC) $4.41B, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) $3.41B.

Which stock is cheaper, METC, HCC and ARLP?

Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ramaco Resources (METC) -7.7x, Warrior Met Coal (HCC) 20.1x, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) 5.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) is cheapest (Warrior Met Coal (HCC) 12.6x, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) 10.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Warrior Met Coal (HCC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ramaco Resources (METC) -17.7%, Warrior Met Coal (HCC) +37.5%, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) -1.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Warrior Met Coal (HCC) has the highest net margin (Ramaco Resources (METC) -12.0%, Warrior Met Coal (HCC) 13.0%). On return on invested capital, Warrior Met Coal (HCC) leads (Ramaco Resources (METC) -6.9%, Warrior Met Coal (HCC) 9.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Warrior Met Coal (HCC) returned the most: Ramaco Resources (METC) -77.4%, Warrior Met Coal (HCC) +35.6%, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) +11.2%. Over five years, Warrior Met Coal (HCC) compounded fastest (Ramaco Resources (METC) -13.6%/yr, Warrior Met Coal (HCC) +29.1%/yr, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) +17.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) has been the steadiest (Ramaco Resources (METC) 85.1%, Warrior Met Coal (HCC) 51.1%, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) 21.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, METC, HCC and ARLP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Warrior Met Coal (HCC) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.