METC vs ARLP Stock Comparison

Ramaco Resources and Alliance Resource Partners Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Alliance Resource Partners leads on 9 of the 12 questions below (Alliance Resource Partners 9). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMETCARLPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $446.63M $3.41B ARLP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -7.2x 12.8x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 10.1x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -17.7% -5.1% ARLP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -12.0% 12.3% ARLP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -6.9% 12.9% ARLP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 16.8x 0.7x ARLP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -79.7% +8.7% ARLP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -12.9%/yr +17.6%/yr ARLP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 84.3% 21.8% ARLP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 67/100 ARLP

Percentile Scorecard

METCARLP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMETCARLP
Valuation 46 #13 of 23 96 #2 of 23
Growth 15 #18 of 21 60 #9 of 21
Profitability 56 #9 of 19 94 #2 of 19
Financial Health 14 #20 of 23 18 #19 of 23
Shareholder Returns 100 #1 of 10 –
Overall 46 67
  • METC ranked among 25 companies in Coal and Uranium
  • ARLP ranked among 25 companies in Coal and Uranium

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMETCARLPSPY
1 month -21.1%+2.3% -1.0%
3 months -29.3%+5.8% +2.9%
6 months -46.9%+5.0% +6.4%
Year to date -59.3%+12.5% +11.4%
1 year -79.7%+8.7% +13.1%
3 years -38.3%+12.1% +79.4%
3 years, per year -14.9%+3.9% +21.5%
5 years -49.7%+124.8% +67.7%
5 years, per year -12.9%+17.6% +10.9%
10 years —+11.5% +255.2%
10 years, per year —+1.1% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureMETCARLPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 84.3%21.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 91.5%20.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.28-0.13 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.950.40 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -86.8%-35.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -79.7%-9.8% -2.5%
52-week high $36.01$28.99 $779.14
52-week low $7.22$23.05 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMETCARLP
P/E now vs peer median -7.7xmedian 26.9x 12.6xmedian 26.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 6.7x 1.5xmedian 6.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 62.7xmedian 11.7x 6.0xmedian 11.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -4.1xmedian 10.2x 9.4xmedian 10.2x
P/B now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 1.2x 1.9xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.20median 47.24 -0.43median 47.24

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMETCARLP
Revenue $515.42M $2.17B
Gross profit $69.82M $775.00M
Operating income -$72.64M $319.75M
Net income -$61.75M $272.96M
Free cash flow -$114.19M $357.09M
EPS (diluted) $-0.96 $2.07
Cash & equivalents $282.54M $111.19M
Total debt $452.81M $579.59M
Shares (diluted) 64.59M 128.66M
Enterprise value -$825.31M $3.10B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMETCARLP
P/E -7.7x 12.6x
P/FCF -4.1x 9.4x
P/Operating cash flow -11.0x 5.5x
P/S 0.9x 1.5x
P/B 1.2x 1.9x
P/Tangible book 1.2x 1.9x
EV/EBITDA 62.7x 6.0x
EV/EBIT -8.7x 12.0x
EV/Revenue 1.2x 1.8x
EV/FCF -5.6x 10.7x
EV/Operating cash flow -15.0x 6.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.20 -0.43

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMETCARLP
Revenue growth (1Y) -17.7% -5.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -3.6% -6.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -34.6% 4.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -28.5% -12.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) -305.3% 6.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -40.1% -26.1%
Net income growth (1Y) -211.7% 13.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -41.5% -28.6%
EPS growth (1Y) -152.3% 12.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -38.3% -29.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -156.4% -9.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -32.6% -16.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -772.6% 12.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -131.8% -18.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMETCARLP
Gross margin 13.5% 35.6%
EBITDA margin 2.0% 29.3%
Operating margin -14.1% 14.7%
Pretax margin -14.8% 13.4%
Net margin -12.0% 12.3%
FCF margin -22.2% 16.4%
Operating cash flow margin -8.2% 28.2%
Return on equity -15.2% 15.3%
Return on assets -5.8% 9.4%
Return on invested capital -6.9% 12.9%
Return on capital employed -7.7% 12.3%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x 2.2x
Stock comp / revenue 3.9% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMETCARLP
Debt / assets 44.2% 19.7%
Debt / equity 1.2x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 16.8x 0.7x
Debt / FCF -4.0x 1.6x
Liabilities / assets 63.3% 39.3%
Equity / assets 36.7% 60.7%
Interest coverage -185.8x 6.9x
Current ratio 4.2x 1.8x
Quick ratio 3.2x 1.1x
Cash ratio 2.6x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 1.06 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMETCARLP
Dividend yield – 9.2%
Net buyback yield 14.2% –
Shareholder yield 14.2% 9.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMETCARLP
Forward P/E – 10.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.91FY2026 $2.59FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +7.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +7.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $535.80MFY2026 $2.37BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -0.2%FY2026 +8.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +37.3% -8.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMETCARLP
Held by institutions 70.2% 15.2%
Institutions holding 200 171
Change in shares held, QoQ -5.7% -11.7%
Institutions buying 106 74
Institutions selling 48 40
Buyers to sellers 2.21 1.85

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

METCARLP
METC 1.00 0.24
ARLP 0.24 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, METC and ARLP?

Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ramaco Resources (METC) $446.63M, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) $3.41B.

Which company is growing faster?

Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ramaco Resources (METC) -17.7%, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) -5.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) has the highest net margin (Ramaco Resources (METC) -12.0%, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) 12.3%). On return on invested capital, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) leads (Ramaco Resources (METC) -6.9%, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) 12.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) returned the most: Ramaco Resources (METC) -79.7%, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) +8.7%. Over five years, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) compounded fastest (Ramaco Resources (METC) -12.9%/yr, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) +17.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) has been the steadiest (Ramaco Resources (METC) 84.3%, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) 21.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do METC and ARLP move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.24, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, METC and ARLP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP) leads on 9. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.