MERC vs GPK vs CLW Stock Comparison

Mercer International, Graphic Packaging Holding and Clearwater Paper Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CLW Clearwater Paper Corp
$19.32 -9.5% 1M -3.2% 1Y
Market cap
$308.01M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.52B
Div. yield
–
Paper Packaging Basic Materials
3 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Graphic Packaging Holding leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Graphic Packaging Holding 5, Clearwater Paper 3, Mercer International 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMERCGPKCLWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $8.43M $2.60B $308.01M GPK
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 0.0x 13.4x -6.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 13.1x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -4.8% +0.0% -1.9% GPK
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -27.9% 2.2% -3.2% GPK
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -23.1% 4.3% -5.7% GPK
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -6.8x 5.1x 20.6x MERC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.19% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -94.4% -50.4% -3.2% CLW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -57.7%/yr -15.8%/yr -14.9%/yr CLW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 96.6% 47.4% 52.7% GPK
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 14/100 51/100 57/100 CLW

Percentile Scorecard

MERCGPKCLW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMERCGPKCLW
Valuation 19 #232 of 287 100 #1 of 16 93 #2 of 16
Growth 1 #265 of 267 0 #16 of 16 47 #9 of 16
Profitability 27 #176 of 240 53 #8 of 16 33 #11 of 16
Financial Health 8 #273 of 295 19 #14 of 17 81 #4 of 17
Shareholder Returns 13 #177 of 204 85 #3 of 14 31 #10 of 14
Overall 14 51 57
  • MERC ranked among 308 companies in Basic Materials
  • GPK ranked among 17 companies in Packaging
  • CLW ranked among 17 companies in Packaging

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMERCGPKCLWSPY
1 month -56.3%-9.3%-9.5% -1.0%
3 months -79.1%-20.4%+14.8% +2.9%
6 months -87.5%-6.2%+32.1% +6.4%
Year to date -92.9%-41.8%+11.0% +11.4%
1 year -94.4%-50.4%-3.2% +13.1%
3 years -98.4%-56.9%-43.3% +79.4%
3 years, per year -74.7%-24.5%-17.2% +21.5%
5 years -98.6%-57.5%-55.5% +67.7%
5 years, per year -57.7%-15.8%-14.9% +10.9%
10 years -98.2%-35.1%-65.5% +255.2%
10 years, per year -33.1%-4.2%-10.1% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureMERCGPKCLWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 96.6%47.4%52.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 113.0%47.9%50.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.910.870.90 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.98-1.06-0.06 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.2%-73.0%-77.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -95.0%-50.4%-17.1% -2.5%
52-week high $2.79$17.68$23.30 $779.14
52-week low $0.14$8.24$12.44 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMERCGPKCLW
P/E now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 17.9x 13.4xmedian 18.2x -6.3xmedian 18.2x
P/S now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 1.8x 0.3xmedian 0.7x 0.2xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -6.8xmedian 9.8x 7.5xmedian 9.5x 44.8xmedian 9.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -0.1xmedian 16.0x 13.7xmedian 15.7x 5.5xmedian 15.7x
P/B now vs peer median -0.1xmedian 1.8x 0.8xmedian 1.4x 0.4xmedian 1.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.00median 0.73 -0.39median 0.83 0.16median 0.83

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMERCGPKCLW
Revenue $1.86B $8.64B $1.52B
Gross profit $52.72M $1.34B $24.60M
Operating income -$437.94M $504.00M -$82.20M
Net income -$517.45M $194.00M -$49.30M
Free cash flow -$154.18M $189.00M $56.60M
EPS (diluted) $-7.72 $0.65 $-3.06
Cash & equivalents $78.78M $205.00M $95.40M
Total debt $1.95B $5.67B $361.10M
Shares (diluted) 67.04M 296.70M 16.13M
Enterprise value -$439.79M $1.82B $111.01M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMERCGPKCLW
P/E 0.0x 13.4x -6.3x
P/FCF -0.1x 13.7x 5.5x
P/Operating cash flow -0.1x 3.3x 2.9x
P/S 0.0x 0.3x 0.2x
P/B -0.1x 0.8x 0.4x
P/Tangible book -0.1x 1.0x 0.4x
EV/EBITDA -6.8x 7.5x 44.8x
EV/EBIT -4.3x 16.0x -7.0x
EV/Revenue 1.0x 0.9x 0.4x
EV/FCF -12.2x 42.6x 10.2x
EV/Operating cash flow -22.2x 10.2x 5.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.00 -0.39 0.16

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMERCGPKCLW
Revenue growth (1Y) -4.8% 0.0% -1.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -5.0% -3.7% 25.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -81.9% -26.6% -80.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -45.3% -13.6% 28.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) -5,891% -45.9% -647.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -163.0% -24.2% -38.8%
Net income growth (1Y) -373.6% -63.7% -124.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -130.8% -35.0% -39.6%
EPS growth (1Y) -372.7% -63.1% -124.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -130.0% -34.1% -40.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -270.4% 3.1% 337.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -41.4% -10.1% 17.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -261.2% 147.8% 131.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -0.7% -28.6% 63.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMERCGPKCLW
Gross margin 2.8% 15.5% 1.6%
EBITDA margin -14.9% 12.4% 0.8%
Operating margin -23.6% 5.8% -5.4%
Pretax margin -29.7% 2.9% -6.9%
Net margin -27.9% 2.2% -3.2%
FCF margin -8.3% 2.2% 3.7%
Operating cash flow margin -4.6% 9.2% 7.1%
Return on equity – 6.0% -6.1%
Return on assets -27.0% 1.7% -3.1%
Return on invested capital -23.1% 4.3% -5.7%
Return on capital employed -33.3% 5.3% -6.1%
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.7x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.2x 4.1x -2.2x
Stock comp / revenue 0.0% 0.2% 0.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMERCGPKCLW
Debt / assets 104.3% 48.6% 23.0%
Debt / equity -19.9x 1.8x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA -6.8x 5.1x 20.6x
Debt / FCF -12.7x 30.0x 6.4x
Liabilities / assets 105.2% 72.2% 49.5%
Equity / assets -5.2% 27.8% 50.5%
Interest coverage -3.7x 2.0x –
Current ratio 1.3x 1.4x 2.3x
Quick ratio 0.6x 0.5x 1.1x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.1x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 0.04 1.34 2.00

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMERCGPKCLW
Dividend yield 0.0% 5.0% –
Net buyback yield – – 0.7%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 5.0% 0.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) -1.9% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) -6.5% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) -60.0% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -26.1% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMERCGPKCLW
Forward P/E – 13.1xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-3.78FY2026 $0.67FY2026 $-3.47FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -62.8%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +43.3% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.04BFY2026 $8.23BFY2026 $1.56BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +9.1%FY2026 -4.5%FY2026 +0.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +12.0% +0.0% +6.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMERCGPKCLW
Held by institutions 63.8% 100.0% 88.7%
Institutions holding 67 499 134
Change in shares held, QoQ -11.3% +5.3% +9.9%
Institutions buying 27 322 85
Institutions selling 19 130 33
Buyers to sellers 1.42 2.48 2.58

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MERCGPKCLW
MERC 1.00 0.20 0.17
GPK 0.20 1.00 0.46
CLW 0.17 0.46 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MERC, GPK and CLW?

Graphic Packaging Holding (GPK) is the largest by market capitalisation: Mercer International (MERC) $8.43M, Graphic Packaging Holding (GPK) $2.60B, Clearwater Paper (CLW) $308.01M.

Which company is growing faster?

Graphic Packaging Holding (GPK) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Mercer International (MERC) -4.8%, Graphic Packaging Holding (GPK) +0.0%, Clearwater Paper (CLW) -1.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Graphic Packaging Holding (GPK) has the highest net margin (Mercer International (MERC) -27.9%, Graphic Packaging Holding (GPK) 2.2%, Clearwater Paper (CLW) -3.2%). On return on invested capital, Graphic Packaging Holding (GPK) leads (Mercer International (MERC) -23.1%, Graphic Packaging Holding (GPK) 4.3%, Clearwater Paper (CLW) -5.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Clearwater Paper (CLW) returned the most: Mercer International (MERC) -94.4%, Graphic Packaging Holding (GPK) -50.4%, Clearwater Paper (CLW) -3.2%. Over five years, Clearwater Paper (CLW) compounded fastest (Mercer International (MERC) -57.7%/yr, Graphic Packaging Holding (GPK) -15.8%/yr, Clearwater Paper (CLW) -14.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Mercer International (MERC) 1.19%, Graphic Packaging Holding (GPK) 0.00%, Clearwater Paper (CLW) 0.00%. Graphic Packaging Holding (GPK) and Clearwater Paper (CLW) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Graphic Packaging Holding (GPK) has been the steadiest (Mercer International (MERC) 96.6%, Graphic Packaging Holding (GPK) 47.4%, Clearwater Paper (CLW) 52.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MERC, GPK and CLW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Graphic Packaging Holding (GPK) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.