MCTA vs VVV vs BFAM Stock Comparison

Charming Medical, Valvoline and Bright Horizons Family Solutions Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MCTA Charming Medical Ltd
$29.35 0.0% 1M +319.3% 1Y
Market cap
$445.47M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Personal Services Consumer Discretionary
1 win
VVV Valvoline Inc
$31.93 +10.4% 1M -5.3% 1Y
Market cap
$4.07B
P/E
40.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.96B
Div. yield
–
Personal Services Consumer Discretionary
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Bright Horizons Family Solutions leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Bright Horizons Family Solutions 6, Valvoline 4, Charming Medical 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMCTAVVVBFAMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $445.47M $4.07B $3.62B VVV
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -20,929x 40.1x 20.7x BFAM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 18.8x 13.9x BFAM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +16.1% +8.5% VVV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 5.2% 5.8% BFAM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 8.8% 9.3% BFAM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.4x 2.8x BFAM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +319.3% -5.3% -27.0% MCTA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -1.1%/yr -14.4%/yr VVV
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 73.8% 34.6% 47.7% VVV
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 33/100 51/100 BFAM

Percentile Scorecard

MCTAVVVBFAM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMCTAVVVBFAM
Valuation 0 #33 of 33 19 #27 of 33 31 #23 of 33
Growth – 31 #21 of 30 52 #15 of 30
Profitability – 75 #8 of 29 50 #15 of 29
Financial Health 87 #6 of 39 8 #36 of 39 24 #30 of 39
Shareholder Returns – – 100 #1 of 14
Overall – 33 51
  • MCTA ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services
  • VVV ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services
  • BFAM ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMCTAVVVBFAMSPY
1 month 0.0%+10.4%+11.8% -0.8%
3 months 0.0%-19.3%-5.4% +3.5%
6 months 0.0%-3.2%-9.4% +7.0%
Year to date 0.0%+9.9%-27.4% +12.2%
1 year +319.3%-5.3%-27.0% +13.0%
3 years —+6.6%+2.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year —+2.1%+0.7% +23.1%
5 years —-5.3%-54.0% +68.6%
5 years, per year —-1.1%-14.4% +11.0%
10 years —+54.2%+9.9% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+4.4%+1.0% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureMCTAVVVBFAMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 73.8%34.6%47.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y —34.1%55.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.260.57-0.29 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 4.32-0.15-0.57 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -25.6%-44.1%-67.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-20.7%-32.6% -1.8%
52-week high $29.35$40.28$109.23 $779.14
52-week low $7.00$26.62$59.18 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMCTAVVVBFAM
P/E now vs peer median -20,929xmedian 15.5x 40.2xmedian 15.5x 21.7xmedian 15.5x
P/S now vs peer median 92.7xmedian 1.3x 2.1xmedian 1.3x 1.2xmedian 1.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 10.1x 12.6xmedian 10.1x 11.7xmedian 10.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -286.4xmedian 14.7x 29.0xmedian 14.7x 15.4xmedian 14.7x
P/B now vs peer median 86.0xmedian 2.0x 9.8xmedian 2.0x 3.8xmedian 2.0x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.35 -0.72median 0.35 0.49median 0.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMCTAVVVBFAM
Revenue – $1.96B $3.03B
Gross profit – $751.90M $711.35M
Operating income – $301.00M $311.11M
Net income – $101.50M $175.04M
Free cash flow – $140.50M $235.93M
EPS (diluted) – $0.79 $3.38
Cash & equivalents $4.70M $84.20M $163.69M
Total debt – $1.60B $1.29B
Shares (diluted) 16.15M 128.40M 51.76M
Enterprise value $439.45M $3.78B $3.07B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMCTAVVVBFAM
P/E -20,929x 40.2x 21.7x
P/FCF -286.4x 29.0x 15.4x
P/Operating cash flow – 9.9x 10.9x
P/S 92.7x 2.1x 1.2x
P/B 86.0x 9.8x 3.8x
P/Tangible book 86.0x 9.8x 4.8x
EV/EBITDA – 12.6x 11.7x
EV/EBIT – 18.6x 15.3x
EV/Revenue – 2.8x 1.6x
EV/FCF – 39.8x 20.1x
EV/Operating cash flow – 13.6x 14.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -0.72 0.49

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMCTAVVVBFAM
Revenue growth (1Y) – 16.1% 8.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 12.2% 10.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 15.4% 7.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 12.7% 12.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -31.6% 8.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 7.2% 26.2%
Net income growth (1Y) – -63.5% -1.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -59.5% 39.1%
EPS growth (1Y) – -63.5% 10.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -56.2% 44.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 40.6% 0.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 6.3% 11.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 129.6% -2.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -7.0% 14.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMCTAVVVBFAM
Gross margin – 38.3% 23.5%
EBITDA margin – 22.6% 13.5%
Operating margin – 15.3% 10.3%
Pretax margin – 9.0% 8.6%
Net margin – 5.2% 5.8%
FCF margin – 7.2% 7.8%
Operating cash flow margin – 21.0% 11.0%
Return on equity – 26.4% 16.8%
Return on assets – 2.9% 4.6%
Return on invested capital – 8.8% 9.3%
Return on capital employed – 9.9% 11.0%
Asset turnover – 0.6x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 4.1x 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.6% 1.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMCTAVVVBFAM
Debt / assets 1.9% 46.0% 34.0%
Debt / equity 0.0x 3.8x 1.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.4x 2.8x
Debt / FCF – 11.4x 5.5x
Liabilities / assets 47.5% 88.0% 75.1%
Equity / assets 52.5% 12.0% 24.9%
Interest coverage – – 6.2x
Current ratio 1.9x 0.7x 0.5x
Quick ratio 1.4x 0.5x 0.4x
Cash ratio 1.4x 0.2x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – 1.75 2.04

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMCTAVVVBFAM
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – 17.5%
Shareholder yield – 0.0% 17.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMCTAVVVBFAM
Forward P/E – 18.8xFY2026 13.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $1.70FY2026 $5.31FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +6.9%FY2026 +16.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +10.0% +13.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.98BFY2026 $3.03BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +16.0%FY2026 +3.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +23.4% +2.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMCTAVVVBFAM
Held by institutions – 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding – 450 384
Change in shares held, QoQ – -0.1% -1.2%
Institutions buying – 234 205
Institutions selling – 143 150
Buyers to sellers – 1.64 1.37

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MCTAVVVBFAM
MCTA 1.00 0.01 -0.15
VVV 0.01 1.00 0.06
BFAM -0.15 0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MCTA, VVV and BFAM?

Valvoline (VVV) is the largest by market capitalisation: Charming Medical (MCTA) $445.47M, Valvoline (VVV) $4.07B, Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) $3.62B.

Which stock is cheaper, MCTA, VVV and BFAM?

Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Charming Medical (MCTA) -20,929x, Valvoline (VVV) 40.1x, Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) 20.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) is cheapest (Valvoline (VVV) 18.8x, Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) 13.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Valvoline (VVV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Valvoline (VVV) +16.1%, Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) +8.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) has the highest net margin (Valvoline (VVV) 5.2%, Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) 5.8%). On return on invested capital, Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) leads (Valvoline (VVV) 8.8%, Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) 9.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Charming Medical (MCTA) returned the most: Charming Medical (MCTA) +319.3%, Valvoline (VVV) -5.3%, Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) -27.0%. Over five years, Valvoline (VVV) compounded fastest (Valvoline (VVV) -1.1%/yr, Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) -14.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Valvoline (VVV) has been the steadiest (Charming Medical (MCTA) 73.8%, Valvoline (VVV) 34.6%, Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) 47.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MCTA, VVV and BFAM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.