MCTA vs RENT vs DRVN Stock Comparison

Charming Medical, Rent the Runway and Driven Brands Holdings Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MCTA Charming Medical Ltd
$29.35 0.0% 1M +203.5% 1Y
Market cap
$445.47M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Personal Services Consumer Discretionary
1 win
RENT Rent the Runway, Inc.
$2.69 +67.1% 1M -34.5% 1Y
Market cap
$86.79M
P/E
2.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$366.90M
Div. yield
–
Online Retail Consumer Discretionary
4 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Driven Brands Holdings leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Driven Brands Holdings 4, Rent the Runway 4, Charming Medical 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMCTARENTDRVNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $445.47M $86.79M $1.99B DRVN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -20,929x 2.0x 12.0x RENT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 10.3x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +21.2% +7.6% RENT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 11.8% 8.6% RENT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 10.8% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -9.6x 3.8x RENT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +203.5% -34.5% -22.4% MCTA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -62.1%/yr -18.3%/yr DRVN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 68.8% 83.0% 55.8% DRVN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 34/100 49/100 DRVN

Percentile Scorecard

MCTARENTDRVN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMCTARENTDRVN
Valuation 0 #33 of 33 36 #67 of 104 59 #14 of 33
Growth – 81 #19 of 98 66 #11 of 30
Profitability – 37 #61 of 96 56 #13 of 28
Financial Health 89 #5 of 37 13 #96 of 110 14 #32 of 37
Shareholder Returns – 3 #69 of 71 –
Overall – 34 49
  • MCTA ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services
  • RENT ranked among 115 companies in Retail
  • DRVN ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMCTARENTDRVNSPY
1 month 0.0%+67.1%+0.9% +0.9%
3 months 0.0%-27.3%-20.8% +5.9%
6 months 0.0%-40.5%-6.9% +8.5%
Year to date 0.0%-66.0%-20.0% +13.3%
1 year +203.5%-34.5%-22.4% +12.4%
3 years —-75.0%+7.8% +88.1%
3 years, per year —-37.1%+2.5% +23.5%
5 years —-99.2%-63.5% +68.2%
5 years, per year —-62.1%-18.3% +11.0%

Risk

MeasureMCTARENTDRVNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 68.8%83.0%55.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y —81.3%63.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.051.550.41 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.96-0.42-0.40 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -25.6%-99.6%-70.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-71.4%-30.6% -0.9%
52-week high $29.35$9.39$17.09 $779.14
52-week low $9.67$1.55$10.30 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMCTARENTDRVN
P/E now vs peer median -20,929xmedian 14.9x 2.1xmedian 16.7x 11.8xmedian 14.9x
P/S now vs peer median 92.7xmedian 1.2x 0.2xmedian 0.4x 1.0xmedian 1.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 9.3x -16.4xmedian 9.2x 8.8xmedian 9.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -286.4xmedian 14.5x -1.4xmedian 16.0x 14.6xmedian 14.5x
P/B now vs peer median 86.0xmedian 1.8x -1.4xmedian 1.6x 2.3xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.35 0.08median 0.73 1.50median 0.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMCTARENTDRVN
Revenue – $366.90M $1.93B
Gross profit – $274.20M –
Operating income – -$45.20M $269.79M
Net income – $43.30M $165.27M
Free cash flow – -$66.40M $133.78M
EPS (diluted) – $1.29 $1.00
Cash & equivalents $4.70M $29.00M $183.95M
Total debt – $157.50M $1.69B
Shares (diluted) 16.15M 33.58M 164.94M
Enterprise value $439.45M -$80.41M $1.46B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMCTARENTDRVN
P/E -20,929x 2.1x 11.8x
P/FCF -286.4x -1.4x 14.6x
P/Operating cash flow – 129.8x 6.3x
P/S 92.7x 0.2x 1.0x
P/B 86.0x -1.4x 2.3x
P/Tangible book 86.0x -1.3x 8.6x
EV/EBITDA – -16.4x 8.8x
EV/EBIT – -4.9x 12.8x
EV/Revenue – 0.6x 1.8x
EV/FCF – -3.3x 25.8x
EV/Operating cash flow – 313.4x 11.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.08 1.50

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMCTARENTDRVN
Revenue growth (1Y) – 21.2% 7.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 6.6% -4.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 25.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 8.9% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 26.1% 62.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 18.5% -7.1%
Net income growth (1Y) – 151.1% 163.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 33.2% 7.4%
EPS growth (1Y) – 106.1% 163.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 26.8% 7.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -82.1% 6.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 26.8% 9.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -1.7% 276.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 11.6% 33.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMCTARENTDRVN
Gross margin – 74.7% –
EBITDA margin – -3.7% 20.4%
Operating margin – -12.3% 14.0%
Pretax margin – 11.8% 8.3%
Net margin – 11.8% 8.6%
FCF margin – -18.1% 6.9%
Operating cash flow margin – 0.2% 16.2%
Return on equity – – 20.6%
Return on assets – 21.4% 4.8%
Return on invested capital – – 10.8%
Return on capital employed – -33.1% 8.6%
Asset turnover – 1.8x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.0x 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.0% 1.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMCTARENTDRVN
Debt / assets 1.9% 81.9% 47.6%
Debt / equity 0.0x -2.4x 2.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – -9.6x 3.8x
Debt / FCF – -2.4x 12.6x
Liabilities / assets 47.5% 134.0% 76.5%
Equity / assets 52.5% -34.0% 23.5%
Interest coverage – – 2.8x
Current ratio 1.9x 0.7x 1.5x
Quick ratio 1.4x 0.4x 0.9x
Cash ratio 1.4x 0.4x 0.5x
Altman Z-score – -7.03 0.95

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMCTARENTDRVN
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -14.0% –
Shareholder yield – -14.0% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMCTARENTDRVN
Forward P/E – – 10.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $-19.23FY2026 $1.15FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -458.1%FY2026 -5.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +30.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $293.58MFY2026 $1.93BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – -11.0%FY2026 +3.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +43.4% +18.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMCTARENTDRVN
Held by institutions – 9.3% 43.3%
Institutions holding – 53 193
Change in shares held, QoQ – +7.2% -8.5%
Institutions buying – 30 111
Institutions selling – 9 51
Buyers to sellers – 3.33 2.18

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MCTARENTDRVN
MCTA 1.00 0.02 -0.01
RENT 0.02 1.00 0.10
DRVN -0.01 0.10 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MCTA, RENT and DRVN?

Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Charming Medical (MCTA) $445.47M, Rent the Runway (RENT) $86.79M, Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) $1.99B.

Which stock is cheaper, MCTA, RENT and DRVN?

Rent the Runway (RENT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Charming Medical (MCTA) -20,929x, Rent the Runway (RENT) 2.0x, Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) 12.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Rent the Runway (RENT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Rent the Runway (RENT) +21.2%, Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) +7.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Rent the Runway (RENT) has the highest net margin (Rent the Runway (RENT) 11.8%, Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) 8.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Charming Medical (MCTA) returned the most: Charming Medical (MCTA) +203.5%, Rent the Runway (RENT) -34.5%, Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) -22.4%. Over five years, Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) compounded fastest (Rent the Runway (RENT) -62.1%/yr, Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) -18.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) has been the steadiest (Charming Medical (MCTA) 68.8%, Rent the Runway (RENT) 83.0%, Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) 55.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MCTA, RENT and DRVN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.