MCTA vs OSW vs BBY Stock Comparison

Charming Medical, Onespaworld Holdings and Best Buy Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MCTA Charming Medical Ltd
$29.35 0.0% 1M +319.3% 1Y
Market cap
$445.47M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Personal Services Consumer Discretionary
1 win
OSW ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd
$23.99 +4.7% 1M +13.0% 1Y
Market cap
$2.47B
P/E
30.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.01B
Div. yield
–
Personal Services Consumer Discretionary
4 wins
BBY Best Buy Co Inc
$97.91 +8.2% 1M +17.6% 1Y
Market cap
$20.59B
P/E
16.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$42.20B
Div. yield
–
Specialty Retail Consumer Discretionary
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Best Buy leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Best Buy 6, Onespaworld Holdings 4, Charming Medical 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMCTAOSWBBYLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $445.47M $2.47B $20.59B BBY
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -20,929x 30.5x 16.2x BBY
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 21.6x 13.5x BBY
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +9.8% +1.4% OSW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 8.0% 3.0% OSW
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 13.1% 29.0% BBY
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.4x -0.4x BBY
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +319.3% +13.0% +17.6% MCTA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +17.0%/yr -3.8%/yr OSW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 73.8% 35.0% 37.5% OSW
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 49/100 63/100 BBY

Percentile Scorecard

MCTAOSWBBY

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMCTAOSWBBY
Valuation 0 #33 of 33 13 #29 of 33 63 #39 of 104
Growth – 69 #10 of 30 49 #51 of 99
Profitability – 43 #17 of 29 78 #23 of 99
Financial Health 87 #6 of 39 90 #5 of 39 56 #50 of 113
Shareholder Returns – 31 #10 of 14 71 #22 of 73
Overall – 49 63
  • MCTA ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services
  • OSW ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services
  • BBY ranked among 115 companies in Retail

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMCTAOSWBBYSPY
1 month 0.0%+4.7%+8.2% -0.8%
3 months 0.0%-11.8%+10.7% +3.5%
6 months 0.0%+0.6%+65.2% +7.0%
Year to date 0.0%+15.7%+46.3% +12.2%
1 year +319.3%+13.0%+17.6% +13.0%
3 years —+131.8%+52.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year —+32.4%+15.0% +23.1%
5 years —+119.3%-17.5% +68.6%
5 years, per year —+17.0%-3.8% +11.0%
10 years ——+149.2% +258.0%
10 years, per year ——+9.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureMCTAOSWBBYSPY
Volatility, 1Y 73.8%35.0%37.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y —35.3%32.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.260.920.43 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 4.320.370.47 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -25.6%-45.0%-59.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-16.4%-1.9% -1.8%
52-week high $29.35$28.68$99.85 $779.14
52-week low $7.00$19.37$55.52 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMCTAOSWBBY
P/E now vs peer median -20,929xmedian 15.5x 30.2xmedian 15.5x 16.3xmedian 16.7x
P/S now vs peer median 92.7xmedian 1.3x 2.4xmedian 1.3x 0.5xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 10.1x 21.1xmedian 10.1x 7.8xmedian 9.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -286.4xmedian 14.7x 31.1xmedian 14.7x 11.7xmedian 16.5x
P/B now vs peer median 86.0xmedian 2.0x 4.2xmedian 2.0x 6.5xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.35 0.33median 0.35 32.15median 0.72

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMCTAOSWBBY
Revenue – $1.01B $42.20B
Gross profit – $169.55M $9.57B
Operating income – $90.05M $1.71B
Net income – $80.95M $1.27B
Free cash flow – $78.23M $1.77B
EPS (diluted) – $0.79 $5.98
Cash & equivalents $4.70M $40.36M $2.26B
Total debt – $81.60M $1.17B
Shares (diluted) 16.15M 102.48M 212.70M
Enterprise value $439.45M $2.37B $13.93B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMCTAOSWBBY
P/E -20,929x 30.2x 16.3x
P/FCF -286.4x 31.1x 11.7x
P/Operating cash flow – 25.5x 8.3x
P/S 92.7x 2.4x 0.5x
P/B 86.0x 4.2x 6.5x
P/Tangible book 86.0x 30.7x 6.5x
EV/EBITDA – 21.1x 7.8x
EV/EBIT – 27.5x 11.4x
EV/Revenue – 2.5x 0.5x
EV/FCF – 31.7x 11.0x
EV/Operating cash flow – 25.9x 7.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.33 32.15

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMCTAOSWBBY
Revenue growth (1Y) – 9.8% 1.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 12.2% -1.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 9.7% 2.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 13.8% -0.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 10.9% 64.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 25.9% 1.8%
Net income growth (1Y) – 13.8% 63.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 93.3% -0.5%
EPS growth (1Y) – 15.0% 63.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 91.0% 0.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 26.4% 19.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 25.9% -3.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 17.3% 30.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 22.2% -1.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMCTAOSWBBY
Gross margin – 16.8% 22.7%
EBITDA margin – 11.6% 5.9%
Operating margin – 8.9% 4.1%
Pretax margin – 8.4% 4.1%
Net margin – 8.0% 3.0%
FCF margin – 7.7% 4.2%
Operating cash flow margin – 9.5% 5.9%
Return on equity – 14.2% 40.5%
Return on assets – 11.2% 8.2%
Return on invested capital – 13.1% 29.0%
Return on capital employed – 13.6% 26.1%
Asset turnover – 1.4x 2.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.2x 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.9% 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMCTAOSWBBY
Debt / assets 1.9% 11.2% 7.3%
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.1x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.4x -0.4x
Debt / FCF – 1.0x 0.7x
Liabilities / assets 47.5% 20.2% 80.2%
Equity / assets 52.5% 79.8% 19.8%
Interest coverage – 16.8x 38.0x
Current ratio 1.9x 2.9x 1.1x
Quick ratio 1.4x 2.5x 0.4x
Cash ratio 1.4x 0.7x 0.3x
Altman Z-score – 11.47 4.25

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMCTAOSWBBY
Dividend yield – 0.8% 3.9%
Net buyback yield – 1.6% 0.7%
Shareholder yield – 2.4% 4.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMCTAOSWBBY
Forward P/E – 21.6xFY2026 13.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $1.11FY2026 $7.25FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +12.1%FY2026 +12.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +10.8% -4.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.09BFY2026 $44.26BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +13.7%FY2026 +6.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +7.9% -8.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMCTAOSWBBY
Held by institutions – 100.0% 93.2%
Institutions holding – 258 873
Change in shares held, QoQ – -0.5% -0.3%
Institutions buying – 144 463
Institutions selling – 79 323
Buyers to sellers – 1.82 1.43

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MCTAOSWBBY
MCTA 1.00 0.13 0.02
OSW 0.13 1.00 0.12
BBY 0.02 0.12 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MCTA, OSW and BBY?

Best Buy (BBY) is the largest by market capitalisation: Charming Medical (MCTA) $445.47M, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) $2.47B, Best Buy (BBY) $20.59B.

Which stock is cheaper, MCTA, OSW and BBY?

Best Buy (BBY) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Charming Medical (MCTA) -20,929x, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) 30.5x, Best Buy (BBY) 16.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Best Buy (BBY) is cheapest (Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) 21.6x, Best Buy (BBY) 13.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) +9.8%, Best Buy (BBY) +1.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) has the highest net margin (Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) 8.0%, Best Buy (BBY) 3.0%). On return on invested capital, Best Buy (BBY) leads (Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) 13.1%, Best Buy (BBY) 29.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Charming Medical (MCTA) returned the most: Charming Medical (MCTA) +319.3%, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) +13.0%, Best Buy (BBY) +17.6%. Over five years, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) compounded fastest (Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) +17.0%/yr, Best Buy (BBY) -3.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) has been the steadiest (Charming Medical (MCTA) 73.8%, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) 35.0%, Best Buy (BBY) 37.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MCTA, OSW and BBY?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Best Buy (BBY) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.