MCTA vs DRVN Stock Comparison

Charming Medical and Driven Brands Holdings Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MCTA Charming Medical Ltd
$29.35 0.0% 1M +319.3% 1Y
Market cap
$445.47M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Personal Services Consumer Discretionary
1 win

Head to Head

3 decided of 12

Driven Brands Holdings leads on 2 of the 12 questions below (Driven Brands Holdings 2, Charming Medical 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMCTADRVNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $445.47M $1.91B DRVN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -20,929x 11.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 10.2x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +7.6% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 8.6% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 10.8% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.8x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +319.3% -23.6% MCTA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -16.8%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 73.8% 55.9% DRVN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 49/100 –

Percentile Scorecard

MCTADRVN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMCTADRVN
Valuation 0 #33 of 33 59 #14 of 33
Growth – 62 #12 of 30
Profitability – 57 #13 of 29
Financial Health 87 #6 of 39 16 #33 of 39
Shareholder Returns – –
Overall – 49
  • MCTA ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services
  • DRVN ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMCTADRVNSPY
1 month 0.0%-5.0% -0.8%
3 months 0.0%-18.6% +3.5%
6 months 0.0%-8.1% +7.0%
Year to date 0.0%-21.1% +12.2%
1 year +319.3%-23.6% +13.0%
3 years —+6.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year —+2.1% +23.1%
5 years —-60.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year —-16.8% +11.0%

Risk

MeasureMCTADRVNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 73.8%55.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y —63.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.260.41 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 4.32-0.42 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -25.6%-70.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-31.6% -1.8%
52-week high $29.35$17.09 $779.14
52-week low $7.00$10.30 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMCTADRVN
P/E now vs peer median -20,929xmedian 15.5x 11.6xmedian 15.5x
P/S now vs peer median 92.7xmedian 1.3x 1.0xmedian 1.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 10.1x 8.7xmedian 10.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -286.4xmedian 14.7x 14.4xmedian 14.7x
P/B now vs peer median 86.0xmedian 2.0x 2.3xmedian 2.0x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.35 1.48median 0.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMCTADRVN
Revenue – $1.93B
Operating income – $269.79M
Net income – $165.27M
Free cash flow – $133.78M
EPS (diluted) – $1.00
Cash & equivalents $4.70M $183.95M
Total debt – $1.69B
Shares (diluted) 16.15M 164.94M
Enterprise value $439.45M $1.38B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMCTADRVN
P/E -20,929x 11.6x
P/FCF -286.4x 14.4x
P/Operating cash flow – 6.2x
P/S 92.7x 1.0x
P/B 86.0x 2.3x
P/Tangible book 86.0x 8.5x
EV/EBITDA – 8.7x
EV/EBIT – 12.7x
EV/Revenue – 1.8x
EV/FCF – 25.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – 11.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 1.48

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMCTADRVN
Revenue growth (1Y) – 7.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -4.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 62.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -7.1%
Net income growth (1Y) – 163.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 7.4%
EPS growth (1Y) – 163.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 7.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 6.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 9.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 276.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 33.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMCTADRVN
Gross margin – –
EBITDA margin – 20.4%
Operating margin – 14.0%
Pretax margin – 8.3%
Net margin – 8.6%
FCF margin – 6.9%
Operating cash flow margin – 16.2%
Return on equity – 20.6%
Return on assets – 4.8%
Return on invested capital – 10.8%
Return on capital employed – 8.6%
Asset turnover – 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMCTADRVN
Debt / assets 1.9% 47.6%
Debt / equity 0.0x 2.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.8x
Debt / FCF – 12.6x
Liabilities / assets 47.5% 76.5%
Equity / assets 52.5% 23.5%
Interest coverage – 2.8x
Current ratio 1.9x 1.5x
Quick ratio 1.4x 0.9x
Cash ratio 1.4x 0.5x
Altman Z-score – 0.94

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMCTADRVN
Dividend yield – –
Net buyback yield – –
Shareholder yield – 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMCTADRVN
Forward P/E – 10.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $1.15FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -5.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +30.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.93BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +3.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +18.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMCTADRVN
Held by institutions – 43.3%
Institutions holding – 193
Change in shares held, QoQ – -8.5%
Institutions buying – 111
Institutions selling – 51
Buyers to sellers – 2.18

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MCTADRVN
MCTA 1.00 -0.03
DRVN -0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MCTA and DRVN?

Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Charming Medical (MCTA) $445.47M, Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) $1.91B.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Charming Medical (MCTA) returned the most: Charming Medical (MCTA) +319.3%, Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) -23.6%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) has been the steadiest (Charming Medical (MCTA) 73.8%, Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) 55.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do MCTA and DRVN move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of -0.03, a negative relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, MCTA and DRVN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) leads on 2. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.