MCO vs MA vs VRSK Stock Comparison

Moodys, Mastercard and Verisk Analytics Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MCO Moodys Corp /De/
$483.45 +2.0% 1M +0.9% 1Y
Market cap
$83.73B
P/E
29.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.18B
Div. yield
0.01%
Financial Data and Analytics Financial Services
1 win
MA Mastercard Inc
$623.47 +11.3% 1M +8.7% 1Y
Market cap
$541.87B
P/E
33.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$35.08B
Div. yield
–
Payment Networks Financial Services
8 wins
VRSK Verisk Analytics, Inc.
$195.88 +14.0% 1M -16.6% 1Y
Market cap
$25.66B
P/E
29.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.14B
Div. yield
–
Financial Data and Analytics Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Mastercard leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Mastercard 8, Verisk Analytics 2, Moodys 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMCOMAVRSKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $83.73B $541.87B $25.66B MA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 29.0x 33.3x 29.0x VRSK
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 26.8x 29.7x 24.6x VRSK
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.0% +16.0% +5.0% MA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 35.3% 46.3% 28.2% MA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 27.9% 59.0% 31.9% MA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.3x 0.6x 2.3x MA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +0.9% +8.7% -16.6% MA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +4.8%/yr +11.7%/yr -1.8%/yr MA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 28.5% 22.6% 37.2% MA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 51/100 55/100 MCO

Percentile Scorecard

MCOMAVRSK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMCOMAVRSK
Valuation 18 #771 of 945 13 #822 of 945 28 #682 of 945
Growth 73 #219 of 822 68 #268 of 822 47 #440 of 822
Profitability 97 #26 of 835 99 #11 of 835 97 #27 of 835
Financial Health 53 #424 of 905 49 #461 of 905 33 #604 of 905
Shareholder Returns 58 #304 of 726 28 #521 of 726 72 #201 of 726
Overall 60 51 55
  • MCO ranked among 1,011 companies in Financial Services
  • MA ranked among 1,011 companies in Financial Services
  • VRSK ranked among 1,011 companies in Financial Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMCOMAVRSKSPY
1 month +2.0%+11.3%+14.0% -1.0%
3 months +2.5%+15.5%-2.7% +2.9%
6 months +6.0%+23.7%+10.3% +6.4%
Year to date -5.4%+9.2%-12.4% +11.4%
1 year +0.9%+8.7%-16.6% +13.1%
3 years +58.2%+61.1%-14.9% +79.4%
3 years, per year +16.5%+17.3%-5.2% +21.5%
5 years +26.7%+73.8%-8.5% +67.7%
5 years, per year +4.8%+11.7%-1.8% +10.9%
10 years +372.9%+506.2%+141.1% +255.2%
10 years, per year +16.8%+19.7%+9.2% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureMCOMAVRSKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 28.5%22.6%37.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 30.2%22.4%38.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.510.27-0.47 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.030.38-0.45 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -42.2%-28.6%-51.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -10.4%-1.5%-16.6% -2.5%
52-week high $539.61$632.81$234.94 $779.14
52-week low $412.23$471.55$156.84 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMCOMAVRSK
P/E now vs peer median 29.0xmedian 13.4x 33.8xmedian 13.4x 28.9xmedian 13.4x
P/S now vs peer median 10.2xmedian 3.2x 15.5xmedian 3.2x 8.1xmedian 3.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 21.4xmedian 5.9x 23.1xmedian 5.9x 17.1xmedian 5.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 28.0xmedian 11.1x 32.5xmedian 11.1x 20.6xmedian 11.1x
P/B now vs peer median 24.4xmedian 1.2x 96.7xmedian 1.2x -21.4xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 1.09median 0.89 1.73median 0.89 1.16median 0.89

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMCOMAVRSK
Revenue $8.18B $35.08B $3.14B
Gross profit $6.10B – $2.20B
Operating income $3.64B $20.47B $1.38B
Net income $2.89B $16.26B $885.50M
Free cash flow $2.98B $16.70B $1.24B
EPS (diluted) $16.64 $18.41 $6.77
Cash & equivalents $1.51B $11.29B $551.40M
Total debt $6.91B $81.59B $11.77B
Shares (diluted) 173.30M 883.00M 130.85M
Enterprise value $76.65B $501.79B $20.30B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMCOMAVRSK
P/E 29.0x 33.8x 28.9x
P/FCF 28.0x 32.5x 20.6x
P/Operating cash flow 25.0x 31.1x 17.0x
P/S 10.2x 15.5x 8.1x
P/B 24.4x 96.7x -21.4x
P/Tangible book 48.5x 3,744x -17.0x
EV/EBITDA 21.4x 23.1x 17.1x
EV/EBIT 24.3x 27.2x 21.4x
EV/Revenue 10.8x 15.9x 9.4x
EV/FCF 29.8x 33.3x 23.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 26.6x 31.9x 19.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.09 1.73 1.16

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMCOMAVRSK
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.0% 16.0% 5.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.6% 14.1% 6.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 10.3% – 6.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 14.6% – 8.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 16.0% 21.3% 4.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 23.3% 16.1% 6.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 28.5% 19.7% -3.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 24.0% 16.7% 20.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 33.1% 23.2% 3.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 26.5% 19.5% 25.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 22.5% 2.9% 21.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.5% 14.6% 11.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 24.1% 0.9% 21.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 18.8% 14.4% 14.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMCOMAVRSK
Gross margin 74.6% – 70.2%
EBITDA margin 50.6% 68.6% 55.0%
Operating margin 44.6% 58.3% 43.9%
Pretax margin 45.2% 57.5% 37.0%
Net margin 35.3% 46.3% 28.2%
FCF margin 36.4% 47.6% 39.4%
Operating cash flow margin 40.7% 49.7% 47.9%
Return on equity 87.8% 263.6% –
Return on assets 19.6% 29.5% 19.5%
Return on invested capital 27.9% 59.0% 31.9%
Return on capital employed 31.8% 68.1% 40.1%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.6x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 1.1x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue 2.8% 1.8% 1.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMCOMAVRSK
Debt / assets 46.6% 42.7% 99.5%
Debt / equity 2.0x 4.4x -3.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.3x 0.6x 2.3x
Debt / FCF 2.3x 1.5x 3.6x
Liabilities / assets 77.0% 90.3% 126.4%
Equity / assets 23.0% 9.7% -26.4%
Interest coverage – 27.4x 7.0x
Current ratio 1.3x 1.1x 1.0x
Quick ratio 1.3x 0.7x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.5x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 7.67 10.29 6.93

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMCOMAVRSK
Dividend yield 0.8% 0.6% 1.0%
Net buyback yield 3.5% 2.9% 7.3%
Shareholder yield 4.4% 3.4% 8.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) 24.6% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 23.8% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.0% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 8.8% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMCOMAVRSK
Forward P/E 26.8xFY2026 29.7xFY2026 24.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $18.07FY2026 $20.99FY2026 $7.97FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +21.0%FY2026 +23.4%FY2026 +11.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -1.2% +14.7% +5.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.74BFY2026 $38.98BFY2026 $3.33BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +13.2%FY2026 +18.9%FY2026 +8.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -1.8% +0.4% +6.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMCOMAVRSK
Held by institutions 90.8% 88.6% 97.6%
Institutions holding 1,404 3,581 953
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.6% +0.6% -0.4%
Institutions buying 644 1,587 487
Institutions selling 522 1,526 349
Buyers to sellers 1.23 1.04 1.40

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MCOMAVRSK
MCO 1.00 0.45 0.59
MA 0.45 1.00 0.35
VRSK 0.59 0.35 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MCO, MA and VRSK?

Mastercard (MA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Moodys (MCO) $83.73B, Mastercard (MA) $541.87B, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) $25.66B.

Which stock is cheaper, MCO, MA and VRSK?

Verisk Analytics (VRSK) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Moodys (MCO) 29.0x, Mastercard (MA) 33.3x, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) 29.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) is cheapest (Moodys (MCO) 26.8x, Mastercard (MA) 29.7x, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) 24.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Mastercard (MA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Moodys (MCO) +9.0%, Mastercard (MA) +16.0%, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) +5.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Mastercard (MA) has the highest net margin (Moodys (MCO) 35.3%, Mastercard (MA) 46.3%, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) 28.2%). On return on invested capital, Mastercard (MA) leads (Moodys (MCO) 27.9%, Mastercard (MA) 59.0%, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) 31.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Mastercard (MA) returned the most: Moodys (MCO) +0.9%, Mastercard (MA) +8.7%, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) -16.6%. Over five years, Mastercard (MA) compounded fastest (Moodys (MCO) +4.8%/yr, Mastercard (MA) +11.7%/yr, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) -1.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Moodys (MCO) 0.01%, Mastercard (MA) 0.00%, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) 0.00%. Mastercard (MA) and Verisk Analytics (VRSK) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Mastercard (MA) has been the steadiest (Moodys (MCO) 28.5%, Mastercard (MA) 22.6%, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) 37.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MCO, MA and VRSK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Mastercard (MA) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.