MBUU vs THO vs PII Stock Comparison

Malibu Boats, Thor Industries and Polaris Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MBUU Malibu Boats, Inc.
$22.28 -3.7% 1M -33.2% 1Y
Market cap
$430.11M
P/E
260.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$914.59M
Div. yield
–
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
THO Thor Industries Inc
$71.10 -0.4% 1M -35.1% 1Y
Market cap
$3.67B
P/E
21.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.61B
Div. yield
2.95%
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
7 wins
PII Polaris Inc.
$58.65 +12.1% 1M -13.0% 1Y
Market cap
$3.34B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
4.62%
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
2 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Thor Industries leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Thor Industries 7, Malibu Boats 3, Polaris 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMBUUTHOPIILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $430.11M $3.67B $3.34B THO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 260.2x 21.0x -16.4x THO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.6x 20.4x 18.1x MBUU
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +13.3% +0.3% — MBUU
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.2% 1.8% — THO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.3% 4.3% — THO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.9x 0.8x — THO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 2.95% 4.62% PII
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -33.2% -35.1% -13.0% PII
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -20.6%/yr -7.0%/yr -12.6%/yr THO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 48.8% 39.2% 46.9% THO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 65/100 62/100 31/100 MBUU

Percentile Scorecard

MBUUTHOPII

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMBUUTHOPII
Valuation 76 #13 of 50 78 #12 of 50 43 #29 of 50
Growth 8 #45 of 49 15 #42 of 49 13 #43 of 49
Profitability 65 #17 of 47 70 #15 of 47 –
Financial Health 77 #13 of 53 85 #9 of 53 14 #46 of 53
Shareholder Returns 100 #1 of 31 63 #12 of 31 53 #15 of 31
Overall 65 62 31
  • MBUU ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • THO ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • PII ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMBUUTHOPIISPY
1 month -3.7%-0.4%+12.1% +0.9%
3 months -20.2%-8.9%-12.9% +5.9%
6 months -11.7%-8.6%-12.7% +8.5%
Year to date -21.0%-30.7%-7.3% +13.3%
1 year -33.2%-35.1%-13.0% +12.4%
3 years -50.5%-16.3%-31.2% +88.1%
3 years, per year -20.9%-5.8%-11.7% +23.5%
5 years -68.4%-30.3%-49.0% +68.2%
5 years, per year -20.6%-7.0%-12.6% +11.0%
10 years +52.9%-10.4%-22.1% +263.4%
10 years, per year +4.3%-1.1%-2.5% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureMBUUTHOPIISPY
Volatility, 1Y 48.8%39.2%46.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 49.6%41.2%48.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.470.951.27 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.68-0.89-0.28 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -72.1%-50.5%-76.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -35.6%-40.9%-21.7% -0.9%
52-week high $34.61$120.34$74.93 $779.14
52-week low $21.49$63.86$47.88 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMBUUTHOPII
P/E now vs peer median 260.2xmedian 20.0x 21.0xmedian 20.0x -16.4xmedian 20.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 0.5x 0.4xmedian 0.5x —median 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.1xmedian 8.7x 7.1xmedian 8.7x —median 8.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 10.0xmedian 9.4x 21.7xmedian 9.4x 12.6xmedian 9.4x
P/B now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 0.9x 0.9xmedian 0.9x 3.9xmedian 0.9x
PEG now vs peer median -3.50median 1.35 -0.98median 1.35 0.50median 1.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMBUUTHOPII
Revenue $914.59M $9.61B –
Gross profit $146.52M $1.21B –
Operating income $3.10M $309.23M –
Net income $1.71M $179.04M -$205.80M
Free cash flow $42.85M $168.84M $265.50M
EPS (diluted) $0.09 $3.38 $-3.51
Cash & equivalents $74.42M $481.99M $301.70M
Total debt $165.00M $928.80M $1.63B
Shares (diluted) 19.34M 52.56M 58.50M
Enterprise value $237.19M $2.06B $2.32B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMBUUTHOPII
P/E 260.2x 21.0x -16.4x
P/FCF 10.0x 21.7x 12.6x
P/Operating cash flow 6.4x 11.4x 7.1x
P/S 0.5x 0.4x –
P/B 0.8x 0.9x 3.9x
P/Tangible book 1.9x 1.0x 3.9x
EV/EBITDA 11.1x 7.1x –
EV/EBIT 168.0x 13.3x –
EV/Revenue 0.6x 0.4x –
EV/FCF 12.2x 24.4x 17.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 7.7x 12.8x 9.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -3.50 -0.98 0.50

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMBUUTHOPII
Revenue growth (1Y) 13.3% 0.3% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -13.0% -4.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 1.7% -9.5% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -25.3% -8.8% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -85.8% -26.0% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -72.2% -24.8% –
Net income growth (1Y) -88.8% -30.1% -36.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -74.9% -21.9% -32.9%
EPS growth (1Y) -88.7% -30.2% -32.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -74.3% -21.4% -32.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 19.5% -44.4% -38.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -28.5% -31.1% -15.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 49.9% -62.9% -54.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -30.9% -39.8% -8.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMBUUTHOPII
Gross margin 16.0% 12.6% –
EBITDA margin 5.1% 6.0% –
Operating margin 0.3% 3.2% –
Pretax margin 0.3% 2.5% –
Net margin 0.2% 1.8% –
FCF margin 4.7% 1.8% –
Operating cash flow margin 7.4% 3.3% –
Return on equity 0.3% 4.1% -24.3%
Return on assets 0.2% 2.5% -4.0%
Return on invested capital 0.3% 4.3% –
Return on capital employed 0.4% 5.6% –
Asset turnover 0.9x 1.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 39.5x 1.8x -2.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.6% 0.3% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMBUUTHOPII
Debt / assets 16.6% 13.4% 32.2%
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.2x 1.9x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.9x 0.8x –
Debt / FCF 3.9x 5.5x 6.1x
Liabilities / assets 47.0% 38.7% 83.2%
Equity / assets 53.0% 61.3% 16.8%
Interest coverage 0.9x – –
Current ratio 1.4x 1.8x 1.1x
Quick ratio 0.6x 0.6x 0.3x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.3x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 2.28 3.45 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMBUUTHOPII
Dividend yield – 3.0% 4.6%
Net buyback yield 7.9% 3.1% 0.1%
Shareholder yield 7.9% 6.1% 4.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 59.7% -74.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 63.3% 57.9%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 2.8% 2.4%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 4.0% 1.5%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMBUUTHOPII
Forward P/E 8.6xFY2027 20.4xFY2027 18.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.58FY2027 $3.49FY2027 $3.24FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +69.7%FY2027 +3.3%FY2027 –
EPS growth, the year after +18.2% +34.1% +9.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.17BFY2027 $9.03BFY2027 $7.61BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +28.4%FY2027 -6.1%FY2027 +6.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +6.6% +17.7% +4.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMBUUTHOPII
Held by institutions 91.4% 100.0% 89.0%
Institutions holding 142 409 477
Change in shares held, QoQ -32.7% +2.4% -6.9%
Institutions buying 90 179 257
Institutions selling 35 153 144
Buyers to sellers 2.57 1.17 1.78

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MBUUTHOPII
MBUU 1.00 0.53 0.57
THO 0.53 1.00 0.53
PII 0.57 0.53 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MBUU, THO and PII?

Thor Industries (THO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Malibu Boats (MBUU) $430.11M, Thor Industries (THO) $3.67B, Polaris (PII) $3.34B.

Which stock is cheaper, MBUU, THO and PII?

Thor Industries (THO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Malibu Boats (MBUU) 260.2x, Thor Industries (THO) 21.0x, Polaris (PII) -16.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Malibu Boats (MBUU) is cheapest (Malibu Boats (MBUU) 8.6x, Thor Industries (THO) 20.4x, Polaris (PII) 18.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Malibu Boats (MBUU) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Malibu Boats (MBUU) +13.3%, Thor Industries (THO) +0.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Thor Industries (THO) has the highest net margin (Malibu Boats (MBUU) 0.2%, Thor Industries (THO) 1.8%). On return on invested capital, Thor Industries (THO) leads (Malibu Boats (MBUU) 0.3%, Thor Industries (THO) 4.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Polaris (PII) returned the most: Malibu Boats (MBUU) -33.2%, Thor Industries (THO) -35.1%, Polaris (PII) -13.0%. Over five years, Thor Industries (THO) compounded fastest (Malibu Boats (MBUU) -20.6%/yr, Thor Industries (THO) -7.0%/yr, Polaris (PII) -12.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Polaris (PII) has the highest dividend yield: Thor Industries (THO) 2.95%, Polaris (PII) 4.62%. Malibu Boats (MBUU) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Thor Industries (THO) has been the steadiest (Malibu Boats (MBUU) 48.8%, Thor Industries (THO) 39.2%, Polaris (PII) 46.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MBUU, THO and PII?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Thor Industries (THO) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.