MBBC vs CFFN vs TFSL Stock Comparison

Marathon Bancorp, Capitol Federal Financial and TFS Financial Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MBBC Marathon Bancorp, Inc. /MD/
$14.52 -5.0% 1M +35.4% 1Y
Market cap
$42.38M
P/E
23.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.03M
Div. yield
–
Thrifts and Savings Banks Financial Services
4 wins
TFSL TFS Financial CORP
$16.73 +0.1% 1M +21.1% 1Y
Market cap
$4.64B
P/E
45.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$343.73M
Div. yield
0.01%
Thrifts and Savings Banks Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Capitol Federal Financial leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Capitol Federal Financial 5, Marathon Bancorp 4, TFS Financial 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMBBCCFFNTFSLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $42.38M $1.04B $4.64B TFSL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 23.7x 12.6x 45.5x CFFN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 11.7x 44.0x CFFN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +33.0% +19.4% +10.5% MBBC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 19.8% 36.1% 29.7% CFFN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.0% 9.5% — CFFN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.3x 4.7x — MBBC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +35.4% +33.9% +21.1% MBBC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +13.1%/yr -6.2%/yr -3.1%/yr MBBC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 32.8% 22.9% 22.1% TFSL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 31/100 52/100 36/100 CFFN

Percentile Scorecard

MBBCCFFNTFSL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMBBCCFFNTFSL
Valuation 12 #317 of 360 20 #289 of 360 1 #355 of 360
Growth 75 #49 of 191 86 #28 of 191 74 #51 of 191
Profitability 23 #129 of 168 47 #89 of 168 30 #118 of 168
Financial Health 43 #101 of 175 9 #159 of 175 –
Shareholder Returns 0 #341 of 341 97 #10 of 341 39 #208 of 341
Overall 31 52 36
  • MBBC ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • CFFN ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • TFSL ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMBBCCFFNTFSLSPY
1 month -5.0%-1.6%+0.1% -0.2%
3 months -2.9%-2.7%-9.5% +3.9%
6 months -5.7%+8.4%+10.9% +8.2%
Year to date +19.4%+25.4%+25.0% +12.9%
1 year +35.4%+33.9%+21.1% +12.3%
3 years +152.1%+73.6%+43.2% +87.4%
3 years, per year +36.1%+20.2%+12.7% +23.3%
5 years +85.2%-27.3%-14.6% +67.9%
5 years, per year +13.1%-6.2%-3.1% +10.9%
10 years —-41.8%-4.9% +261.1%
10 years, per year —-5.3%-0.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMBBCCFFNTFSLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 32.8%22.9%22.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.4%23.3%23.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.130.570.49 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.081.480.96 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -42.4%-66.7%-45.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -6.3%-7.1%-10.1% -1.2%
52-week high $15.49$9.19$18.61 $779.14
52-week low $10.53$6.02$13.25 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMBBCCFFNTFSL
P/E now vs peer median 23.7xmedian 12.1x 12.8xmedian 12.1x 45.7xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 4.8xmedian 3.4x 4.7xmedian 3.4x 13.6xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.6xmedian 5.0x 8.0xmedian 5.0x 7.4xmedian 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 21.7xmedian 10.9x 15.0xmedian 10.9x 54.4xmedian 10.9x
P/B now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 1.2x 1.1xmedian 1.2x —median 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median -3.91median 1.34 0.84median 1.34 5.90median 1.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMBBCCFFNTFSL
Revenue $9.03M $229.25M $343.73M
Net income $1.79M $82.84M $102.06M
Free cash flow $2.02M $71.53M $86.27M
EPS (diluted) $0.66 $0.67 $0.36
Cash & equivalents – $136.10M –
Total debt $20.00M $1.64B –
Shares (diluted) 2.73M 124.01M 280.18M
Enterprise value $42.38M $87.72M $4.64B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMBBCCFFNTFSL
P/E 23.7x 12.8x 45.7x
P/FCF 21.7x 15.0x 54.4x
P/Operating cash flow 17.8x 13.8x 48.0x
P/S 4.8x 4.7x 13.6x
P/B 0.9x 1.1x –
P/Tangible book 0.9x 1.1x –
EV/EBITDA 10.6x 8.0x 7.4x
EV/EBIT 10.9x 8.1x 7.7x
EV/Revenue 7.1x 11.2x 13.6x
EV/FCF 31.6x 36.0x 54.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 26.0x 33.1x 48.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -3.91 0.84 5.90

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMBBCCFFNTFSL
Revenue growth (1Y) 33.0% 19.4% 10.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.1% 5.6% 3.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 4,120% 35.2% 22.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 2.3% 12.5% 7.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 4,174% 41.8% 22.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -6.1% 15.2% 7.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 69.3% 155.9% 180.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 7.2% 4.6% 14.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 59.1% 185.0% 247.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.6% 4.6% 13.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMBBCCFFNTFSL
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 66.7% 140.4% 185.3%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 23.6% 44.7% 37.7%
Net margin 19.8% 36.1% 29.7%
FCF margin 22.4% 31.2% 25.1%
Operating cash flow margin 27.1% 34.0% 28.5%
Return on equity 3.8% 8.1% –
Return on assets 0.7% 0.8% –
Return on invested capital 7.0% 9.5% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.0x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x 0.9x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue 1.8% 0.5% 3.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMBBCCFFNTFSL
Debt / assets 7.7% 16.9% –
Debt / equity 0.4x 1.6x –
Net debt / EBITDA 3.3x 4.7x –
Debt / FCF 9.9x 22.9x –
Liabilities / assets 81.6% 89.4% –
Equity / assets 18.4% 10.6% –
Interest coverage 1.6x 1.5x 1.3x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMBBCCFFNTFSL
Dividend yield – 4.6% 6.9%
Net buyback yield -35.0% 4.6% 0.2%
Shareholder yield -35.0% 9.2% 7.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 58.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 69.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 0.7%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 0.9%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMBBCCFFNTFSL
Forward P/E – 11.7xFY2026 44.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.73FY2026 $0.38FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +40.4%FY2026 +18.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +11.0% +5.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $249.46MFY2026 $326.56MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +24.1%FY2026 +1.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -3.6% +11.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMBBCCFFNTFSL
Held by institutions – 81.1% 13.7%
Institutions holding – 244 234
Change in shares held, QoQ – +0.4% +1.4%
Institutions buying – 110 123
Institutions selling – 79 71
Buyers to sellers – 1.39 1.73

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MBBCCFFNTFSL
MBBC 1.00 -0.06 -0.03
CFFN -0.06 1.00 0.69
TFSL -0.03 0.69 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MBBC, CFFN and TFSL?

TFS Financial (TFSL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Marathon Bancorp (MBBC) $42.38M, Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) $1.04B, TFS Financial (TFSL) $4.64B.

Which stock is cheaper, MBBC, CFFN and TFSL?

Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Marathon Bancorp (MBBC) 23.7x, Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) 12.6x, TFS Financial (TFSL) 45.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) is cheapest (Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) 11.7x, TFS Financial (TFSL) 44.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Marathon Bancorp (MBBC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Marathon Bancorp (MBBC) +33.0%, Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) +19.4%, TFS Financial (TFSL) +10.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) has the highest net margin (Marathon Bancorp (MBBC) 19.8%, Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) 36.1%, TFS Financial (TFSL) 29.7%). On return on invested capital, Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) leads (Marathon Bancorp (MBBC) 7.0%, Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) 9.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Marathon Bancorp (MBBC) returned the most: Marathon Bancorp (MBBC) +35.4%, Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) +33.9%, TFS Financial (TFSL) +21.1%. Over five years, Marathon Bancorp (MBBC) compounded fastest (Marathon Bancorp (MBBC) +13.1%/yr, Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) -6.2%/yr, TFS Financial (TFSL) -3.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Marathon Bancorp (MBBC) 0.00%, Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) 0.00%, TFS Financial (TFSL) 0.01%. Marathon Bancorp (MBBC) and Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, TFS Financial (TFSL) has been the steadiest (Marathon Bancorp (MBBC) 32.8%, Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) 22.9%, TFS Financial (TFSL) 22.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MBBC, CFFN and TFSL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.