MATX vs HAFN vs TNK Stock Comparison

Matson, Hafnia and Teekay Tankers Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MATX Matson, Inc.
$227.28 +0.4% 1M +130.8% 1Y
Market cap
$6.72B
P/E
14.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.46B
Div. yield
0.01%
Marine Shipping Industrials
4 wins
HAFN Hafnia Ltd
$11.07 +14.6% 1M +75.2% 1Y
Market cap
$5.43B
P/E
5.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.52B
Div. yield
–
Marine Shipping Industrials
5 wins
TNK Teekay Tankers Ltd.
$101.36 +4.7% 1M +68.1% 1Y
Market cap
$3.47B
P/E
5.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.15B
Div. yield
–
Marine Shipping Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Hafnia leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Hafnia 5, Matson 4, Teekay Tankers 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMATXHAFNTNKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.72B $5.43B $3.47B MATX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 14.5x 5.1x 5.9x HAFN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.0x 7.6x 5.5x TNK
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -0.2% +30.5% +15.6% HAFN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 13.4% 70.2% 51.3% HAFN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 14.3% 19.3% — HAFN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.3x 0.7x — MATX
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +130.8% +75.2% +68.1% MATX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +22.3%/yr — +48.9%/yr TNK
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 34.6% 36.7% 39.4% MATX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 45/100 74/100 70/100 HAFN

Percentile Scorecard

MATXHAFNTNK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMATXHAFNTNK
Valuation 33 #92 of 136 64 #50 of 136 76 #33 of 136
Growth 23 #94 of 121 68 #39 of 121 71 #36 of 121
Profitability 60 #46 of 112 92 #10 of 112 95 #7 of 112
Financial Health 69 #44 of 140 77 #33 of 140 98 #4 of 140
Shareholder Returns 42 #47 of 80 70 #25 of 80 9 #73 of 80
Overall 45 74 70
  • MATX ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • HAFN ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • TNK ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMATXHAFNTNKSPY
1 month +0.4%+14.6%+4.7% +0.7%
3 months +11.5%+43.8%+30.9% +3.7%
6 months +30.3%+24.2%+29.0% +7.1%
Year to date +84.0%+107.7%+89.7% +12.8%
1 year +130.8%+75.2%+68.1% +11.9%
3 years +151.3%+70.4%+110.6% +85.2%
3 years, per year +36.0%+19.5%+28.2% +22.8%
5 years +172.9%—+630.3% +67.6%
5 years, per year +22.3%—+48.9% +10.9%
10 years +477.6%—+441.5% +262.0%
10 years, per year +19.2%—+18.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMATXHAFNTNKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 34.6%36.7%39.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 26.2%38.8%40.2% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.000.140.18 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 3.782.051.73 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -54.4%-59.2%-53.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -4.2%0.0%-6.6% -1.2%
52-week high $237.28$11.07$108.49 $779.14
52-week low $97.33$5.21$51.50 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMATXHAFNTNK
P/E now vs peer median 14.8xmedian 16.5x 5.2xmedian 16.5x 5.9xmedian 16.5x
P/S now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 0.9x 3.6xmedian 0.9x 3.0xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 9.7xmedian 8.8x 7.1xmedian 8.8x 3.6xmedian 8.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 61.4xmedian 11.9x 7.1xmedian 11.9x 10.7xmedian 11.9x
P/B now vs peer median 2.5xmedian 1.2x 2.1xmedian 1.2x 1.5xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 2.46median 0.84 —median 0.84 1.80median 0.84

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMATXHAFNTNK
Revenue $3.46B $1.52B $1.15B
Gross profit – $835.92M $866.07M
Operating income $525.00M $673.55M $549.35M
Net income $463.80M $658.69M $592.00M
Free cash flow $110.70M $781.70M $326.32M
EPS (diluted) $15.31 $2.12 $17.02
Cash & equivalents $119.30M $353.16M $735.01M
Total debt $332.40M $5.60B –
Shares (diluted) 30.30M 504.11M 34.78M
Enterprise value $6.27B $4.51B -$360.67M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMATXHAFNTNK
P/E 14.8x 5.2x 5.9x
P/FCF 61.4x 7.1x 10.7x
P/Operating cash flow 11.6x 7.8x 6.5x
P/S 2.0x 3.6x 3.0x
P/B 2.5x 2.1x 1.5x
P/Tangible book 2.6x 2.1x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA 9.7x 7.1x 3.6x
EV/EBIT 13.4x 9.1x 4.2x
EV/Revenue 2.0x 4.0x 2.0x
EV/FCF 63.3x 7.9x 7.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 12.0x 8.7x 4.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.46 – 1.80

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMATXHAFNTNK
Revenue growth (1Y) -0.2% 30.5% 15.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.6% – -6.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 41.7% 34.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – -1.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) -10.2% 43.5% 112.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -2.3% – -1.3%
Net income growth (1Y) -6.1% 51.8% 109.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 0.4% – 3.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 0.4% 22.6% 109.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 6.0% – 3.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -5.5% -12.7% 70.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -11.0% – -1.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -57.0% -3.9% 8.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -42.1% – -15.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMATXHAFNTNK
Gross margin – 55.0% 75.1%
EBITDA margin 21.0% 57.3% 55.1%
Operating margin 15.2% 44.3% 47.6%
Pretax margin 15.9% 43.4% 51.9%
Net margin 13.4% 70.2% 51.3%
FCF margin 3.2% 51.5% 28.3%
Operating cash flow margin 16.9% 46.3% 46.9%
Return on equity 16.9% 25.4% 25.9%
Return on assets 10.0% 16.5% 23.8%
Return on invested capital 14.3% 19.3% –
Return on capital employed 13.0% 20.2% 23.4%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.4x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 1.1x 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 0.2% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMATXHAFNTNK
Debt / assets 7.1% 24.9% –
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.4x –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.3x 0.7x –
Debt / FCF 3.0x 1.3x –
Liabilities / assets 41.2% 33.1% 8.3%
Equity / assets 58.8% 66.9% 91.7%
Interest coverage 79.5x 26.9x 208.7x
Current ratio 0.9x 1.7x 10.0x
Quick ratio 0.8x 1.5x 8.8x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.5x 8.2x
Altman Z-score 3.92 3.96 12.05

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMATXHAFNTNK
Dividend yield 0.6% 10.1% 1.0%
Net buyback yield 3.9% -0.1% 0.0%
Shareholder yield 4.5% 10.0% 0.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) 9.6% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 40.3% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) -0.9% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -0.6% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMATXHAFNTNK
Forward P/E 13.0xFY2026 7.6xFY2026 5.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $17.50FY2026 $1.45FY2026 $18.53FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +26.7%FY2026 +113.2%FY2026 +166.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -8.5% -14.5% -30.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.45BFY2026 $1.36BFY2026 $1.14BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.2%FY2026 +42.6%FY2026 +124.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +6.1% -11.3% -27.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMATXHAFNTNK
Held by institutions 86.3% – 57.2%
Institutions holding 429 – 240
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.4% – -4.7%
Institutions buying 213 – 141
Institutions selling 134 – 70
Buyers to sellers 1.59 – 2.01

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MATXHAFNTNK
MATX 1.00 0.20 0.24
HAFN 0.20 1.00 0.75
TNK 0.24 0.75 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MATX, HAFN and TNK?

Matson (MATX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Matson (MATX) $6.72B, Hafnia (HAFN) $5.43B, Teekay Tankers (TNK) $3.47B.

Which stock is cheaper, MATX, HAFN and TNK?

Hafnia (HAFN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Matson (MATX) 14.5x, Hafnia (HAFN) 5.1x, Teekay Tankers (TNK) 5.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Teekay Tankers (TNK) is cheapest (Matson (MATX) 13.0x, Hafnia (HAFN) 7.6x, Teekay Tankers (TNK) 5.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Hafnia (HAFN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Matson (MATX) -0.2%, Hafnia (HAFN) +30.5%, Teekay Tankers (TNK) +15.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Hafnia (HAFN) has the highest net margin (Matson (MATX) 13.4%, Hafnia (HAFN) 70.2%, Teekay Tankers (TNK) 51.3%). On return on invested capital, Hafnia (HAFN) leads (Matson (MATX) 14.3%, Hafnia (HAFN) 19.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Matson (MATX) returned the most: Matson (MATX) +130.8%, Hafnia (HAFN) +75.2%, Teekay Tankers (TNK) +68.1%. Over five years, Teekay Tankers (TNK) compounded fastest (Matson (MATX) +22.3%/yr, Teekay Tankers (TNK) +48.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Matson (MATX) 0.01%, Hafnia (HAFN) 0.00%, Teekay Tankers (TNK) 0.00%. Hafnia (HAFN) and Teekay Tankers (TNK) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Matson (MATX) has been the steadiest (Matson (MATX) 34.6%, Hafnia (HAFN) 36.7%, Teekay Tankers (TNK) 39.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MATX, HAFN and TNK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Hafnia (HAFN) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.