MAT vs YHGJ Stock Comparison

Mattel and Yunhong Green Cti Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MAT Mattel Inc /De/
$15.82 +19.0% 1M -14.3% 1Y
Market cap
$4.46B
P/E
10.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.49B
Div. yield
–
Toys Consumer Discretionary
7 wins
YHGJ Yunhong Green Cti Ltd.
$2.66 +6.8% 1M -52.5% 1Y
Market cap
$7.30M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$19.50M
Div. yield
–
Toys Consumer Discretionary
1 win

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Mattel leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Mattel 7, Yunhong Green Cti 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMATYHGJLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.46B $7.30M MAT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 10.4x -2.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.0x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +2.9% +2.8% MAT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.8% -15.3% MAT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.3% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.0x -3.1x YHGJ
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -14.3% -52.5% MAT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -5.2%/yr -32.8%/yr MAT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 45.0% 84.1% MAT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 63/100 37/100 MAT

Percentile Scorecard

MATYHGJ

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMATYHGJ
Valuation 70 #11 of 34 64 #13 of 34
Growth 32 #22 of 32 26 #24 of 32
Profitability 81 #7 of 32 32 #22 of 32
Financial Health 34 #22 of 33 28 #24 of 33
Shareholder Returns 100 #1 of 18 –
Overall 63 37
  • MAT ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products
  • YHGJ ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMATYHGJSPY
1 month +19.0%+6.8% -0.8%
3 months +6.9%-13.9% +3.5%
6 months +7.5%-10.4% +7.0%
Year to date -20.3%-26.7% +12.2%
1 year -14.3%-52.5% +13.0%
3 years -14.2%-90.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year -5.0%-53.6% +23.1%
5 years -23.3%-86.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year -5.2%-32.8% +11.0%
10 years -50.5%-95.7% +258.0%
10 years, per year -6.8%-27.1% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureMATYHGJSPY
Volatility, 1Y 45.0%84.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 50.6%79.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.530.81 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.32-0.62 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -53.1%-91.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -28.6%-53.4% -1.8%
52-week high $22.16$5.71 $779.14
52-week low $12.66$2.47 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMATYHGJ
P/E now vs peer median 10.7xmedian 17.8x -2.3xmedian 17.8x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 1.1x 0.4xmedian 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.5xmedian 9.3x -7.2xmedian 9.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 8.8xmedian 10.4x 7.4xmedian 10.4x
P/B now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 1.4x 0.9xmedian 1.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.33median 0.33 0.07median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMATYHGJ
Revenue $5.49B $19.50M
Gross profit $2.61B $3.30M
Operating income $429.10M -$2.31M
Net income $427.37M -$2.81M
Free cash flow $512.60M $932.00K
EPS (diluted) $1.48 $-1.14
Cash & equivalents $523.86M $320.00K
Total debt $2.33B $26.33M
Shares (diluted) 288.93M 2.61M
Enterprise value $1.14B $6.32M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMATYHGJ
P/E 10.7x -2.3x
P/FCF 8.8x 7.4x
P/Operating cash flow 6.8x 10.7x
P/S 0.8x 0.4x
P/B 2.3x 0.9x
P/Tangible book 3.0x 0.9x
EV/EBITDA 10.5x -7.2x
EV/EBIT 14.8x -5.3x
EV/Revenue 1.2x 0.6x
EV/FCF 12.3x 13.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.5x 19.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.33 0.07

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMATYHGJ
Revenue growth (1Y) 2.9% 2.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 2.8% 4.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -4.9% -14.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.8% 4.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -36.2% -831.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 0.9% -29.1%
Net income growth (1Y) -18.8% -153.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 23.5% -51.9%
EPS growth (1Y) -8.5% -135.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 32.6% -32.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -10.3% 95.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 7.1% -2.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -13.9% 300.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.3% 19.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMATYHGJ
Gross margin 47.5% 16.9%
EBITDA margin 11.0% -8.7%
Operating margin 7.8% -11.8%
Pretax margin 8.8% -16.4%
Net margin 7.8% -15.3%
FCF margin 9.3% 4.8%
Operating cash flow margin 12.1% 3.3%
Return on equity 20.0% -39.9%
Return on assets 6.5% -15.8%
Return on invested capital 8.3% –
Return on capital employed 8.5% -19.6%
Asset turnover 0.9x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x -0.2x
Stock comp / revenue 1.3% 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMATYHGJ
Debt / assets 36.7% 30.5%
Debt / equity 1.2x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.0x -3.1x
Debt / FCF 4.6x 6.1x
Liabilities / assets 68.6% 58.5%
Equity / assets 31.4% 41.5%
Interest coverage 3.5x -2.6x
Current ratio 1.9x 1.4x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.4x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 2.82 -0.96

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMATYHGJ
Dividend yield – –
Net buyback yield 15.1% –
Shareholder yield 15.1% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMATYHGJ
Forward P/E 12.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.32FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY -6.4%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +10.6% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.04BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +12.8%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after -5.6% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMATYHGJ
Held by institutions 100.0% –
Institutions holding 405 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.8% –
Institutions buying 151 –
Institutions selling 169 –
Buyers to sellers 0.89 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MATYHGJ
MAT 1.00 -0.02
YHGJ -0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MAT and YHGJ?

Mattel (MAT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Mattel (MAT) $4.46B, Yunhong Green Cti (YHGJ) $7.30M.

Which company is growing faster?

Mattel (MAT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Mattel (MAT) +2.9%, Yunhong Green Cti (YHGJ) +2.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Mattel (MAT) has the highest net margin (Mattel (MAT) 7.8%, Yunhong Green Cti (YHGJ) -15.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Mattel (MAT) returned the most: Mattel (MAT) -14.3%, Yunhong Green Cti (YHGJ) -52.5%. Over five years, Mattel (MAT) compounded fastest (Mattel (MAT) -5.2%/yr, Yunhong Green Cti (YHGJ) -32.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Mattel (MAT) has been the steadiest (Mattel (MAT) 45.0%, Yunhong Green Cti (YHGJ) 84.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do MAT and YHGJ move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of -0.02, a negative relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, MAT and YHGJ?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Mattel (MAT) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.