MAT vs KTB vs BBW Stock Comparison

Mattel, Kontoor Brands and Build-A-Bear Workshop Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MAT Mattel Inc /De/
$15.43 +16.1% 1M -19.0% 1Y
Market cap
$4.46B
P/E
10.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.49B
Div. yield
–
Toys Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
KTB Kontoor Brands, Inc.
$74.87 +14.6% 1M -13.0% 1Y
Market cap
$4.08B
P/E
16.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.95B
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
BBW Build-A-Bear Workshop Inc
$24.55 -4.7% 1M -55.8% 1Y
Market cap
$306.16M
P/E
5.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$517.75M
Div. yield
0.04%
Specialty Retail Consumer Discretionary
5 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Build-A-Bear Workshop leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Build-A-Bear Workshop 5, Kontoor Brands 3, Mattel 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMATKTBBBWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.46B $4.08B $306.16M MAT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 10.4x 16.4x 5.9x BBW
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.7x 13.7x 7.6x BBW
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +2.9% +18.6% -0.9% KTB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.8% 8.5% 10.0% BBW
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.3% 14.5% — KTB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.0x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.04% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -19.0% -13.0% -55.8% KTB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -6.3%/yr +7.2%/yr +9.7%/yr BBW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 44.9% 47.8% 57.7% MAT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 63/100 52/100 65/100 BBW

Percentile Scorecard

MATKTBBBW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMATKTBBBW
Valuation 70 #11 of 34 23 #35 of 45 84 #18 of 104
Growth 32 #22 of 32 57 #19 of 43 20 #79 of 99
Profitability 81 #7 of 32 88 #6 of 41 88 #13 of 98
Financial Health 34 #22 of 33 31 #36 of 52 70 #34 of 112
Shareholder Returns 100 #1 of 18 61 #14 of 34 63 #27 of 72
Overall 63 52 65
  • MAT ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products
  • KTB ranked among 52 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • BBW ranked among 115 companies in Retail

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMATKTBBBWSPY
1 month +16.1%+14.6%-4.7% -0.2%
3 months -0.1%-15.0%-30.5% +3.9%
6 months +4.3%+3.9%-35.2% +8.2%
Year to date -22.2%+22.6%-59.9% +12.9%
1 year -19.0%-13.0%-55.8% +12.3%
3 years -16.3%+60.5%+0.5% +87.4%
3 years, per year -5.8%+17.1%+0.2% +23.3%
5 years -27.9%+41.8%+59.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year -6.3%+7.2%+9.7% +10.9%
10 years -50.9%—+105.4% +261.1%
10 years, per year -6.9%—+7.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMATKTBBBWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 44.9%47.8%57.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 50.5%45.8%68.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.530.780.89 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.42-0.27-0.97 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -53.1%-48.3%-69.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -30.4%-15.1%-65.4% -1.2%
52-week high $22.16$88.17$71.03 $779.14
52-week low $12.66$57.48$23.37 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMATKTBBBW
P/E now vs peer median 10.4xmedian 17.8x 16.5xmedian 16.4x 5.9xmedian 16.7x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 1.1x 1.4xmedian 0.7x 0.6xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.3xmedian 9.4x —median 9.9x 3.5xmedian 9.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 8.6xmedian 10.2x —median 12.0x 12.5xmedian 16.5x
P/B now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 1.4x 6.6xmedian 2.2x 1.9xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.32median 0.32 2.19median 0.64 1.03median 0.72

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMATKTBBBW
Revenue $5.49B $2.95B $517.75M
Gross profit $2.61B $1.38B $293.49M
Operating income $429.10M $332.45M $66.71M
Net income $427.37M $249.37M $51.58M
Free cash flow $512.60M – $24.54M
EPS (diluted) $1.48 $4.49 $4.15
Cash & equivalents $523.86M $58.46M $14.00M
Total debt $2.33B $1.14B –
Shares (diluted) 288.93M 55.50M 12.43M
Enterprise value $1.14B $3.78B $211.42M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMATKTBBBW
P/E 10.4x 16.5x 5.9x
P/FCF 8.6x – 12.5x
P/Operating cash flow 6.6x – 5.2x
P/S 0.8x 1.4x 0.6x
P/B 2.2x 6.6x 1.9x
P/Tangible book 2.9x 24.0x 1.9x
EV/EBITDA 10.3x – 3.5x
EV/EBIT 14.5x 15.6x 4.4x
EV/Revenue 1.1x 1.8x 0.6x
EV/FCF 12.1x – 11.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.3x – 4.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.32 2.19 1.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMATKTBBBW
Revenue growth (1Y) 2.9% 18.6% -0.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 2.8% 4.0% 2.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -4.9% 22.2% -0.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.8% 7.9% 4.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) -36.2% 6.3% -10.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 0.9% 1.5% 0.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -18.8% -0.8% -12.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 23.5% 6.7% 0.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -8.5% 0.1% -8.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 32.6% 7.5% 5.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -10.3% – -11.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 7.1% – -6.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -13.9% – -47.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.3% – -24.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMATKTBBBW
Gross margin 47.5% 46.8% 56.7%
EBITDA margin 11.0% – 15.9%
Operating margin 7.8% 11.3% 12.9%
Pretax margin 8.8% 9.8% 13.1%
Net margin 7.8% 8.5% 10.0%
FCF margin 9.3% – 4.7%
Operating cash flow margin 12.1% – 11.4%
Return on equity 20.0% 41.3% 32.4%
Return on assets 6.5% 9.3% 15.0%
Return on invested capital 8.3% 14.5% –
Return on capital employed 8.5% 16.6% 24.9%
Asset turnover 0.9x 1.1x 1.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x – 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 1.3% – 0.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMATKTBBBW
Debt / assets 36.7% 42.9% –
Debt / equity 1.2x 1.8x –
Net debt / EBITDA 3.0x – –
Debt / FCF 4.6x – –
Liabilities / assets 68.6% 76.8% 52.4%
Equity / assets 31.4% 23.2% 47.6%
Interest coverage 3.5x 4.9x –
Current ratio 1.9x 1.8x 1.6x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.5x 0.4x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.1x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 2.80 3.10 3.89

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMATKTBBBW
Dividend yield – 2.8% 3.7%
Net buyback yield 15.5% – 12.3%
Shareholder yield 15.5% 2.8% 16.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 22.2%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 46.7%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 2.3%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – -19.6%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMATKTBBBW
Forward P/E 11.7xFY2026 13.7xFY2026 7.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.32FY2026 $5.45FY2026 $3.25FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -6.4%FY2026 -2.5%FY2026 -18.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +10.6% +12.1% +8.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.04BFY2026 $2.85BFY2026 $533.87MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +12.8%FY2026 -9.5%FY2026 +0.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -5.6% -5.1% -6.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMATKTBBBW
Held by institutions 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 405 429 175
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.8% +6.9% -0.1%
Institutions buying 151 214 91
Institutions selling 169 137 45
Buyers to sellers 0.89 1.56 2.02

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MATKTBBBW
MAT 1.00 0.18 0.26
KTB 0.18 1.00 0.20
BBW 0.26 0.20 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MAT, KTB and BBW?

Mattel (MAT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Mattel (MAT) $4.46B, Kontoor Brands (KTB) $4.08B, Build-A-Bear Workshop (BBW) $306.16M.

Which stock is cheaper, MAT, KTB and BBW?

Build-A-Bear Workshop (BBW) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Mattel (MAT) 10.4x, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 16.4x, Build-A-Bear Workshop (BBW) 5.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Build-A-Bear Workshop (BBW) is cheapest (Mattel (MAT) 11.7x, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 13.7x, Build-A-Bear Workshop (BBW) 7.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Kontoor Brands (KTB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Mattel (MAT) +2.9%, Kontoor Brands (KTB) +18.6%, Build-A-Bear Workshop (BBW) -0.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Build-A-Bear Workshop (BBW) has the highest net margin (Mattel (MAT) 7.8%, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 8.5%, Build-A-Bear Workshop (BBW) 10.0%). On return on invested capital, Kontoor Brands (KTB) leads (Mattel (MAT) 8.3%, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 14.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Kontoor Brands (KTB) returned the most: Mattel (MAT) -19.0%, Kontoor Brands (KTB) -13.0%, Build-A-Bear Workshop (BBW) -55.8%. Over five years, Build-A-Bear Workshop (BBW) compounded fastest (Mattel (MAT) -6.3%/yr, Kontoor Brands (KTB) +7.2%/yr, Build-A-Bear Workshop (BBW) +9.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Mattel (MAT) 0.00%, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 0.00%, Build-A-Bear Workshop (BBW) 0.04%. Mattel (MAT) and Kontoor Brands (KTB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Mattel (MAT) has been the steadiest (Mattel (MAT) 44.9%, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 47.8%, Build-A-Bear Workshop (BBW) 57.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MAT, KTB and BBW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Build-A-Bear Workshop (BBW) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.