MAS vs OTIS vs SHW Stock Comparison

Masco, Otis Worldwide and Sherwin Williams Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MAS Masco Corp /De/
$75.50 +9.6% 1M +10.8% 1Y
Market cap
$14.92B
P/E
16.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.62B
Div. yield
0.02%
Building Products Industrials
6 wins
OTIS Otis Worldwide Corp
$75.26 +14.1% 1M -18.2% 1Y
Market cap
$28.46B
P/E
18.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$14.91B
Div. yield
0.02%
Building Products Industrials
3 wins
SHW Sherwin Williams Co
$335.16 +1.9% 1M +0.3% 1Y
Market cap
$80.66B
P/E
30.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$24.41B
Div. yield
–
Paints and Coatings Basic Materials
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Masco leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Masco 6, Sherwin Williams 3, Otis Worldwide 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMASOTISSHWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $14.92B $28.46B $80.66B SHW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 16.9x 18.8x 30.0x MAS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 15.8x 19.2x 26.4x MAS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -0.6% +5.2% +5.8% SHW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 11.6% 10.2% 11.0% MAS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 33.9% 69.7% 19.2% OTIS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.1x 2.5x SHW
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% 0.02% 0.00% OTIS
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +10.8% -18.2% +0.3% MAS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.3%/yr -1.1%/yr +1.1%/yr MAS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 35.7% 22.8% 27.9% OTIS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 64/100 49/100 55/100 MAS

Percentile Scorecard

MASOTISSHW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMASOTISSHW
Valuation 71 #17 of 56 53 #27 of 56 26 #70 of 94
Growth 41 #31 of 52 53 #25 of 52 73 #26 of 92
Profitability 98 #2 of 51 76 #13 of 51 98 #3 of 89
Financial Health 46 #32 of 58 14 #50 of 58 23 #75 of 97
Shareholder Returns 65 #15 of 41 50 #21 of 41 57 #31 of 70
Overall 64 49 55
  • MAS ranked among 60 companies in Construction Products
  • OTIS ranked among 60 companies in Construction Products
  • SHW ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMASOTISSHWSPY
1 month +9.6%+14.1%+1.9% -0.8%
3 months -7.0%+2.8%+2.4% +3.5%
6 months +1.7%-2.9%-0.3% +7.0%
Year to date +19.0%-13.8%+3.4% +12.2%
1 year +10.8%-18.2%+0.3% +13.0%
3 years +47.9%-1.2%+42.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year +14.0%-0.4%+12.4% +23.1%
5 years +17.5%-5.6%+5.6% +68.6%
5 years, per year +3.3%-1.1%+1.1% +11.0%
10 years +146.7%—+303.4% +258.0%
10 years, per year +9.5%—+15.0% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureMASOTISSHWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 35.7%22.8%27.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.9%23.3%25.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.120.220.85 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.30-0.800.01 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -38.9%-39.6%-42.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -8.8%-19.6%-10.0% -1.8%
52-week high $82.77$93.62$372.60 $779.14
52-week low $58.60$64.07$293.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMASOTISSHW
P/E now vs peer median 17.0xmedian 19.4x 19.0xmedian 19.4x 30.4xmedian 21.6x
P/S now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 1.5x 1.9xmedian 1.5x 3.3xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.1x 14.7xmedian 12.1x 19.7xmedian 12.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 13.2xmedian 16.1x 16.7xmedian 16.1x 25.3xmedian 15.8x
P/B now vs peer median -40.8xmedian 2.9x -5.0xmedian 2.9x 21.1xmedian 1.6x
PEG now vs peer median 2.16median 0.93 2.57median 0.93 4.68median 1.66

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMASOTISSHW
Revenue $7.62B $14.91B $24.41B
Gross profit $2.82B $4.52B $11.96B
Operating income $1.34B $2.29B $3.99B
Net income $937.00M $1.58B $2.69B
Free cash flow $1.13B $1.71B $3.21B
R&D – $154.00M –
EPS (diluted) $4.45 $3.95 $10.93
Cash & equivalents $548.00M $813.00M $293.50M
Total debt $3.25B $8.44B $12.07B
Shares (diluted) 199.00M 383.50M 246.00M
Enterprise value $12.78B $24.88B $79.70B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMASOTISSHW
P/E 17.0x 19.0x 30.4x
P/FCF 13.2x 16.7x 25.3x
P/Operating cash flow 11.5x 15.3x 20.9x
P/S 2.0x 1.9x 3.3x
P/B -40.8x -5.0x 21.1x
P/Tangible book -26.6x -4.7x 1,596x
EV/EBITDA – 14.7x 19.7x
EV/EBIT 13.2x 15.8x 23.3x
EV/Revenue 2.3x 2.4x 3.8x
EV/FCF 15.6x 21.2x 29.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 13.6x 19.4x 24.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.16 2.57 4.68

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMASOTISSHW
Revenue growth (1Y) -0.6% 5.2% 5.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.5% 2.5% 2.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 1.4% 5.4% 6.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.7% 3.1% 5.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) -0.7% 23.6% 8.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 2.1% 2.7% 5.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 9.7% -0.7% 5.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 3.0% 3.4% 4.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 16.6% 3.4% 7.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 7.9% 7.4% 6.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 33.0% 25.7% 27.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.0% 9.5% 14.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 39.2% 27.0% 49.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.8% 9.4% 22.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMASOTISSHW
Gross margin 37.0% 30.3% 49.0%
EBITDA margin – 16.5% 19.3%
Operating margin 17.5% 15.4% 16.4%
Pretax margin 16.2% 13.9% 14.3%
Net margin 11.6% 10.2% 11.0%
FCF margin 14.8% 11.5% 13.2%
Operating cash flow margin 16.9% 12.5% 15.9%
Return on equity – – 64.9%
Return on assets 17.6% 14.5% 10.1%
Return on invested capital 33.9% 69.7% 19.2%
Return on capital employed 36.4% 87.2% 23.4%
Asset turnover 1.4x 1.4x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x 1.2x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.5% 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMASOTISSHW
Debt / assets 60.1% 75.6% 44.8%
Debt / equity -8.9x -1.5x 3.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.1x 2.5x
Debt / FCF 2.9x 4.9x 3.8x
Liabilities / assets 106.8% 151.5% 85.7%
Equity / assets -6.8% -51.5% 14.3%
Interest coverage 13.0x – 7.7x
Current ratio 1.9x 0.8x 0.7x
Quick ratio 1.1x 0.7x 0.4x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.1x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 3.87 2.87 3.50

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMASOTISSHW
Dividend yield 1.7% 2.3% 1.0%
Net buyback yield 6.1% 3.7% 3.0%
Shareholder yield 7.8% 6.0% 4.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 27.5% 41.7% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 22.9% 38.4% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 0.0% 4.4% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 0.3% 9.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMASOTISSHW
Forward P/E 15.8xFY2026 19.2xFY2026 26.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.79FY2026 $3.91FY2026 $12.68FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +21.0%FY2026 -3.5%FY2026 +10.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -7.5% +22.3% -0.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.23BFY2026 $16.18BFY2026 $23.55BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -4.3%FY2026 +12.1%FY2026 -0.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.5% -3.5% +4.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMASOTISSHW
Held by institutions 100.0% 93.1% 82.7%
Institutions holding 921 1,219 1,740
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.7% +3.6% +3.3%
Institutions buying 497 561 746
Institutions selling 289 450 718
Buyers to sellers 1.72 1.25 1.04

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MASOTISSHW
MAS 1.00 0.45 0.70
OTIS 0.45 1.00 0.44
SHW 0.70 0.44 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MAS, OTIS and SHW?

Sherwin Williams (SHW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Masco (MAS) $14.92B, Otis Worldwide (OTIS) $28.46B, Sherwin Williams (SHW) $80.66B.

Which stock is cheaper, MAS, OTIS and SHW?

Masco (MAS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Masco (MAS) 16.9x, Otis Worldwide (OTIS) 18.8x, Sherwin Williams (SHW) 30.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Masco (MAS) is cheapest (Masco (MAS) 15.8x, Otis Worldwide (OTIS) 19.2x, Sherwin Williams (SHW) 26.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Sherwin Williams (SHW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Masco (MAS) -0.6%, Otis Worldwide (OTIS) +5.2%, Sherwin Williams (SHW) +5.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Masco (MAS) has the highest net margin (Masco (MAS) 11.6%, Otis Worldwide (OTIS) 10.2%, Sherwin Williams (SHW) 11.0%). On return on invested capital, Otis Worldwide (OTIS) leads (Masco (MAS) 33.9%, Otis Worldwide (OTIS) 69.7%, Sherwin Williams (SHW) 19.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Masco (MAS) returned the most: Masco (MAS) +10.8%, Otis Worldwide (OTIS) -18.2%, Sherwin Williams (SHW) +0.3%. Over five years, Masco (MAS) compounded fastest (Masco (MAS) +3.3%/yr, Otis Worldwide (OTIS) -1.1%/yr, Sherwin Williams (SHW) +1.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Otis Worldwide (OTIS) has the highest dividend yield: Masco (MAS) 0.02%, Otis Worldwide (OTIS) 0.02%, Sherwin Williams (SHW) 0.00%. Sherwin Williams (SHW) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Otis Worldwide (OTIS) has been the steadiest (Masco (MAS) 35.7%, Otis Worldwide (OTIS) 22.8%, Sherwin Williams (SHW) 27.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MAS, OTIS and SHW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Masco (MAS) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.