MAR vs MSC Stock Comparison

Marriott International and Studio City International Holdings Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Marriott International leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Marriott International 7, Studio City International Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMARMSCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $105.41B $152.14M MAR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 40.7x -3.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 34.4x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.7% +0.7% MAR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.6% -6.5% MAR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 25.5% 2.7% MAR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.3x -14.3x MSC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +48.6% -81.4% MAR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +19.8%/yr -37.4%/yr MAR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 27.2% 108.8% MAR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 50/100 51/100 MSC

Percentile Scorecard

MARMSC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMARMSC
Valuation 22 #22 of 28 74 #8 of 28
Growth 58 #11 of 25 71 #8 of 25
Profitability 63 #10 of 25 33 #17 of 25
Financial Health 45 #17 of 30 28 #22 of 30
Shareholder Returns 61 #8 of 19 –
Overall 50 51
  • MAR ranked among 31 companies in Travel and Lodging
  • MSC ranked among 31 companies in Travel and Lodging

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMARMSCSPY
1 month +10.0%-1.2% +0.9%
3 months +3.5%-55.1% +5.9%
6 months +11.4%-67.4% +8.5%
Year to date +27.1%-77.7% +13.3%
1 year +48.6%-81.4% +12.4%
3 years +112.9%-83.9% +88.1%
3 years, per year +28.7%-45.6% +23.5%
5 years +146.5%-90.4% +68.2%
5 years, per year +19.8%-37.4% +11.0%
10 years +484.8%— +263.4%
10 years, per year +19.3%— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureMARMSCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 27.2%108.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.8%124.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.64-1.26 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.79-0.75 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -30.7%-91.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -2.4%-81.4% -0.9%
52-week high $404.00$4.24 $779.14
52-week low $260.58$0.77 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMARMSC
P/E now vs peer median 40.2xmedian 18.2x -3.4xmedian 18.2x
P/S now vs peer median 3.8xmedian 1.5x 0.2xmedian 1.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 24.1xmedian 14.1x -15.4xmedian 14.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 32.8xmedian 16.4x 1.2xmedian 16.4x
P/B now vs peer median -22.7xmedian 2.5x 0.3xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median 17.46median 0.30 -0.08median 0.30

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMARMSC
Revenue $26.90B $684.09M
Gross profit $5.33B $596.35M
Operating income $4.25B $76.15M
Net income $2.59B -$55.45M
Free cash flow $3.13B $124.87M
EPS (diluted) $9.78 $-0.23
Cash & equivalents $462.00M $106.14M
Total debt $16.92B $1.96B
Shares (diluted) 264.50M 192.59M
Enterprise value $103.46B -$226.26M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMARMSC
P/E 40.2x -3.4x
P/FCF 32.8x 1.2x
P/Operating cash flow 27.6x 0.7x
P/S 3.8x 0.2x
P/B -22.7x 0.3x
P/Tangible book -6.9x 0.3x
EV/EBITDA 24.1x -15.4x
EV/EBIT 28.1x 26.4x
EV/Revenue 4.4x 2.9x
EV/FCF 38.1x 16.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 32.0x 9.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 17.46 -0.08

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMARMSC
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.7% 0.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.5% 57.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 6.6% 1.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.3% 90.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 9.5% 27.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 2.0% 34.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 4.9% 22.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -2.4% 42.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 8.9% 32.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 2.3% 45.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 49.8% 3.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.3% 53.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 86.2% -1.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.6% 75.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMARMSC
Gross margin 19.8% 87.2%
EBITDA margin 18.4% -19.0%
Operating margin 15.8% 11.1%
Pretax margin 12.9% -7.0%
Net margin 9.6% -6.5%
FCF margin 11.6% 18.3%
Operating cash flow margin 13.9% 31.2%
Return on equity – -10.1%
Return on assets 9.2% -2.0%
Return on invested capital 25.5% 2.7%
Return on capital employed 21.2% 3.0%
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x -3.8x
Stock comp / revenue 0.9% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMARMSC
Debt / assets 60.2% 72.1%
Debt / equity -3.7x 3.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.3x -14.3x
Debt / FCF 5.4x 15.7x
Liabilities / assets 116.1% 80.1%
Equity / assets -16.1% 19.9%
Interest coverage 5.0x 0.6x
Current ratio 0.5x 0.8x
Quick ratio 0.5x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 4.16 -0.70

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMARMSC
Dividend yield 0.7% –
Net buyback yield 3.4% –
Shareholder yield 4.1% –
Payout ratio (earnings) 28.3% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 23.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.1% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 13.2% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMARMSC
Forward P/E 34.4xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $11.47FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +14.5%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +22.1% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $26.29BFY2026 $1.25BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +0.4%FY2026 +80.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.2% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMARMSC
Held by institutions 61.3% 22.7%
Institutions holding 1,751 12
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.1% 0.0%
Institutions buying 860 2
Institutions selling 550 2
Buyers to sellers 1.56 1.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MARMSC
MAR 1.00 -0.07
MSC -0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MAR and MSC?

Marriott International (MAR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Marriott International (MAR) $105.41B, Studio City International Holdings (MSC) $152.14M.

Which company is growing faster?

Marriott International (MAR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Marriott International (MAR) +4.7%, Studio City International Holdings (MSC) +0.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Marriott International (MAR) has the highest net margin (Marriott International (MAR) 9.6%, Studio City International Holdings (MSC) -6.5%). On return on invested capital, Marriott International (MAR) leads (Marriott International (MAR) 25.5%, Studio City International Holdings (MSC) 2.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Marriott International (MAR) returned the most: Marriott International (MAR) +48.6%, Studio City International Holdings (MSC) -81.4%. Over five years, Marriott International (MAR) compounded fastest (Marriott International (MAR) +19.8%/yr, Studio City International Holdings (MSC) -37.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Marriott International (MAR) 0.01%, Studio City International Holdings (MSC) 0.00%. Studio City International Holdings (MSC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Marriott International (MAR) has been the steadiest (Marriott International (MAR) 27.2%, Studio City International Holdings (MSC) 108.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do MAR and MSC move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of -0.07, a negative relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, MAR and MSC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Marriott International (MAR) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.