MANU vs ESBA Stock Comparison

Manchester United and Empire State Realty OP Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MANU Manchester United plc
$20.72 +1.7% 1M +13.8% 1Y
Market cap
$3.61B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$909.31M
Div. yield
–
Entertainment Venues Consumer Discretionary
8 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Manchester United leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Manchester United 8, Empire State Realty OP 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMANUESBALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.61B $1.30B MANU
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -61.7x 256.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.5% +2.0% MANU
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -6.4% 0.6% ESBA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 2.6% -1.1% MANU
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.4x 5.0x MANU
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 3.31% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +13.8% -39.1% MANU
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +5.0%/yr -14.3%/yr MANU
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 33.6% 51.8% MANU
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 38/100 MANU

Percentile Scorecard

MANUESBA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMANUESBA
Valuation 45 #12 of 21 62 #16 of 40
Growth 74 #6 of 20 5 #37 of 39
Profitability 61 #8 of 19 44 #20 of 35
Financial Health 30 #17 of 24 71 #12 of 40
Shareholder Returns – 6 #32 of 34
Overall 53 38
  • MANU ranked among 24 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • ESBA ranked among 43 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMANUESBASPY
1 month +1.7%+20.8% -0.8%
3 months -9.8%-13.1% +3.5%
6 months +20.3%-13.7% +7.0%
Year to date +30.2%-23.3% +12.2%
1 year +13.8%-39.1% +13.0%
3 years +17.1%-38.8% +86.3%
3 years, per year +5.4%-15.1% +23.1%
5 years +27.5%-53.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year +5.0%-14.3% +11.0%
10 years +34.1%-75.4% +258.0%
10 years, per year +3.0%-13.1% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureMANUESBASPY
Volatility, 1Y 33.6%51.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 32.1%61.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.680.42 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.41-0.75 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -54.5%-66.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -14.3%-37.7% -1.8%
52-week high $24.19$7.75 $779.14
52-week low $15.20$3.85 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMANUESBA
P/E now vs peer median -61.7xmedian 17.1x 256.9xmedian 22.0x
P/S now vs peer median 4.0xmedian 2.3x 1.7xmedian 2.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.0xmedian 10.9x 12.5xmedian 13.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 9.9xmedian 12.8x -3.0xmedian 28.5x
P/B now vs peer median 18.1xmedian 1.7x 0.7xmedian 0.9x
PEG now vs peer median 3.65median 0.21 -4.30median 2.11

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMANUESBA
Revenue $909.31M $784.18M
Gross profit -$21.12M –
Operating income $30.28M -$34.52M
Net income -$57.81M $9.26M
Free cash flow $363.93M -$437.31M
EPS (diluted) $-0.34 $0.02
Cash & equivalents $89.13M $85.61M
Total debt $3.96B $4.54B
Shares (diluted) 172.43M 268.95M
Enterprise value $3.27B $857.82M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMANUESBA
P/E -61.7x 256.9x
P/FCF 9.9x -3.0x
P/Operating cash flow 14.3x 5.7x
P/S 4.0x 1.7x
P/B 18.1x 0.7x
P/Tangible book 18.1x 0.7x
EV/EBITDA 13.0x 12.5x
EV/EBIT 146.4x -62.8x
EV/Revenue 4.9x 2.8x
EV/FCF 12.2x -5.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 17.5x 9.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.65 -4.30

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMANUESBA
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.5% 2.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.2% 2.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 24.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 223.3% -123.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 62.2% -31.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -36.0% -86.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -19.1% -51.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -35.3% -92.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -16.9% -59.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 128.3% -13.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 22.8% -0.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 141.3% -169.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 34.6% -149.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMANUESBA
Gross margin -2.3% –
EBITDA margin 37.6% 22.1%
Operating margin 3.3% -4.4%
Pretax margin -7.0% 1.3%
Net margin -6.4% 0.6%
FCF margin 40.0% -55.8%
Operating cash flow margin 27.8% 29.0%
Return on equity -26.5% 0.5%
Return on assets -2.8% 0.2%
Return on invested capital 2.6% -1.1%
Return on capital employed 2.5% –
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -4.4x 24.6x
Stock comp / revenue 0.0% 3.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMANUESBA
Debt / assets 44.5% 22.4%
Debt / equity 4.6x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.4x 5.0x
Debt / FCF 2.5x -2.2x
Liabilities / assets 90.3% 58.1%
Equity / assets 9.7% 41.9%
Interest coverage 0.5x -0.3x
Current ratio 0.3x –
Quick ratio 0.2x –
Cash ratio 0.1x –
Altman Z-score 0.97 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMANUESBA
Dividend yield – 3.3%
Net buyback yield – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 3.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMANUESBA
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.18FY2027 –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.07BFY2027 –
Revenue growth, next FY +19.6%FY2027 –
Revenue growth, the year after -5.1% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMANUESBA
Held by institutions 17.1% –
Institutions holding 125 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.0% –
Institutions buying 63 –
Institutions selling 30 –
Buyers to sellers 2.10 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MANUESBA
MANU 1.00 0.22
ESBA 0.22 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MANU and ESBA?

Manchester United (MANU) is the largest by market capitalisation: Manchester United (MANU) $3.61B, Empire State Realty OP (ESBA) $1.30B.

Which company is growing faster?

Manchester United (MANU) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Manchester United (MANU) +5.5%, Empire State Realty OP (ESBA) +2.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Empire State Realty OP (ESBA) has the highest net margin (Manchester United (MANU) -6.4%, Empire State Realty OP (ESBA) 0.6%). On return on invested capital, Manchester United (MANU) leads (Manchester United (MANU) 2.6%, Empire State Realty OP (ESBA) -1.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Manchester United (MANU) returned the most: Manchester United (MANU) +13.8%, Empire State Realty OP (ESBA) -39.1%. Over five years, Manchester United (MANU) compounded fastest (Manchester United (MANU) +5.0%/yr, Empire State Realty OP (ESBA) -14.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Manchester United (MANU) 0.00%, Empire State Realty OP (ESBA) 3.31%. Manchester United (MANU) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Manchester United (MANU) has been the steadiest (Manchester United (MANU) 33.6%, Empire State Realty OP (ESBA) 51.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do MANU and ESBA move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.22, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, MANU and ESBA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Manchester United (MANU) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.