LYFT vs URI vs DASH Stock Comparison

Lyft, United Rentals and DoorDash Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LYFT Lyft, Inc.
$16.79 +13.0% 1M -18.6% 1Y
Market cap
$6.36B
P/E
2.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.77B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
4 wins
URI United Rentals, Inc.
$1,162.88 +11.1% 1M +29.2% 1Y
Market cap
$72.09B
P/E
25.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.50B
Div. yield
0.66%
Equipment Rental Industrials
5 wins
DASH DoorDash, Inc.
$170.56 -11.8% 1M -35.2% 1Y
Market cap
$73.90B
P/E
88.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$15.89B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

United Rentals leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (United Rentals 5, Lyft 4, DoorDash 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLYFTURIDASHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.36B $72.09B $73.90B DASH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 2.2x 25.3x 88.1x LYFT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 29.5x 21.0x 61.4x URI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.8% +9.4% +33.6% DASH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 42.3% 16.3% 5.3% LYFT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.0% 14.0% — URI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -25.9x 2.3x — LYFT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.66% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -18.6% +29.2% -35.2% URI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -18.6%/yr +26.0%/yr -2.7%/yr URI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 47.9% 42.3% 50.0% URI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 70/100 56/100 54/100 LYFT

Percentile Scorecard

LYFTURIDASH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLYFTURIDASH
Valuation 82 #31 of 167 20 #37 of 46 26 #124 of 167
Growth 89 #18 of 153 92 #4 of 39 82 #28 of 153
Profitability 56 #68 of 153 95 #3 of 39 62 #59 of 153
Financial Health 46 #98 of 179 20 #38 of 47 57 #77 of 179
Shareholder Returns 80 #20 of 94 52 #16 of 32 43 #54 of 94
Overall 70 56 54
  • LYFT ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • URI ranked among 49 companies in Distribution and Rental
  • DASH ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLYFTURIDASHSPY
1 month +13.0%+11.1%-11.8% -0.2%
3 months +8.7%+6.6%-12.8% +3.9%
6 months +18.1%+20.8%-0.8% +8.2%
Year to date -13.3%+43.7%-24.7% +12.9%
1 year -18.6%+29.2%-35.2% +12.3%
3 years +81.3%+191.4%+141.4% +87.4%
3 years, per year +22.0%+42.9%+34.2% +23.3%
5 years -64.2%+216.7%-13.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year -18.6%+26.0%-2.7% +10.9%
10 years —+1,424.7%— +261.1%
10 years, per year —+31.3%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLYFTURIDASHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 47.9%42.3%50.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 53.7%39.1%53.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.381.041.40 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.390.69-0.71 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -85.8%-40.0%-82.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -31.7%-0.2%-35.9% -1.2%
52-week high $24.57$1,165.29$266.06 $779.14
52-week low $12.65$710.47$146.60 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLYFTURIDASH
P/E now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 17.3x 25.3xmedian 25.3x 88.1xmedian 17.3x
P/S now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 1.4x 4.1xmedian 1.0x 4.7xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 179.0xmedian 14.2x 13.7xmedian 13.4x 38.1xmedian 14.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.7xmedian 11.5x 80.8xmedian 21.9x 28.5xmedian 11.5x
P/B now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 1.8x 7.4xmedian 2.6x 7.4xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 0.04median 0.40 2.66median 2.38 2.36median 0.40

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLYFTURIDASH
Revenue $6.77B $17.50B $15.89B
Gross profit $3.08B $6.84B $8.17B
Operating income -$119.72M $4.47B $712.00M
Net income $2.87B $2.86B $841.00M
Free cash flow $1.11B $892.00M $2.60B
R&D $472.97M – $1.71B
EPS (diluted) $7.42 $45.89 $1.91
Cash & equivalents $1.14B $153.00M $4.42B
Total debt $990.56M $14.67B –
Shares (diluted) 386.33M 62.26M 439.35M
Enterprise value -$989.46M $71.21B $53.28B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLYFTURIDASH
P/E 2.2x 25.3x 88.1x
P/FCF 5.7x 80.8x 28.5x
P/Operating cash flow 5.3x 11.6x 26.1x
P/S 0.9x 4.1x 4.7x
P/B 2.1x 7.4x 7.4x
P/Tangible book 2.2x 7.8x 9.3x
EV/EBITDA 179.0x 13.7x 38.1x
EV/EBIT -46.4x 19.4x 96.3x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 5.0x 4.3x
EV/FCF 5.0x 97.1x 26.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 4.6x 14.0x 24.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.04 2.66 2.36

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLYFTURIDASH
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.8% 9.4% 33.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 16.8% 8.0% 27.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 20.9% 10.4% 37.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 20.8% 6.0% 32.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) -117.1% 11.5% 31.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 54.4% 5.7% 38.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 3,009% 12.9% 7.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 61.1% 6.2% 38.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 3,303% 16.6% 7.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 60.8% 9.5% 37.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 14.0% 24.2% 29.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 98.9% 10.9% 40.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 12.0% 98.2% 30.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 72.6% 83.7% 45.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLYFTURIDASH
Gross margin 45.5% 39.1% 51.4%
EBITDA margin 0.5% 36.1% 11.3%
Operating margin -1.8% 25.5% 4.5%
Pretax margin -0.1% 21.8% 5.5%
Net margin 42.3% 16.3% 5.3%
FCF margin 16.4% 5.1% 16.3%
Operating cash flow margin 17.6% 35.4% 17.8%
Return on equity 94.7% 30.2% 8.3%
Return on assets 31.8% 8.9% 4.3%
Return on invested capital 0.0% 14.0% –
Return on capital employed -2.9% 16.5% 5.3%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.5x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.4x 2.2x 3.4x
Stock comp / revenue 4.6% 0.9% 7.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLYFTURIDASH
Debt / assets 10.9% 44.7% –
Debt / equity 0.3x 1.5x –
Net debt / EBITDA -25.9x 2.3x –
Debt / FCF 0.9x 16.4x –
Liabilities / assets 66.8% 70.4% 49.3%
Equity / assets 33.2% 29.6% 50.7%
Interest coverage -5.9x – –
Current ratio 0.6x 0.8x 1.4x
Quick ratio 0.4x 0.6x 1.1x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.0x 0.9x
Altman Z-score -0.07 3.57 5.31

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLYFTURIDASH
Dividend yield – 0.7% –
Net buyback yield 10.9% 2.5% 1.4%
Shareholder yield 10.9% 3.2% 1.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLYFTURIDASH
Forward P/E 29.5xFY2026 21.0xFY2026 61.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.57FY2026 $55.27FY2026 $2.78FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -91.6%FY2026 +31.4%FY2026 +30.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +80.7% +6.3% +79.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.97BFY2026 $18.69BFY2026 $18.88BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +10.3%FY2026 +16.1%FY2026 +37.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.1% +3.1% +11.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLYFTURIDASH
Held by institutions 100.0% 95.9% 88.2%
Institutions holding 528 1,587 1,043
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.2% +4.7% +7.4%
Institutions buying 260 804 578
Institutions selling 175 537 349
Buyers to sellers 1.49 1.50 1.66

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LYFTURIDASH
LYFT 1.00 0.03 0.39
URI 0.03 1.00 0.00
DASH 0.39 0.00 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LYFT, URI and DASH?

DoorDash (DASH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lyft (LYFT) $6.36B, United Rentals (URI) $72.09B, DoorDash (DASH) $73.90B.

Which stock is cheaper, LYFT, URI and DASH?

Lyft (LYFT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Lyft (LYFT) 2.2x, United Rentals (URI) 25.3x, DoorDash (DASH) 88.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, United Rentals (URI) is cheapest (Lyft (LYFT) 29.5x, United Rentals (URI) 21.0x, DoorDash (DASH) 61.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

DoorDash (DASH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lyft (LYFT) +10.8%, United Rentals (URI) +9.4%, DoorDash (DASH) +33.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lyft (LYFT) has the highest net margin (Lyft (LYFT) 42.3%, United Rentals (URI) 16.3%, DoorDash (DASH) 5.3%). On return on invested capital, United Rentals (URI) leads (Lyft (LYFT) 0.0%, United Rentals (URI) 14.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year United Rentals (URI) returned the most: Lyft (LYFT) -18.6%, United Rentals (URI) +29.2%, DoorDash (DASH) -35.2%. Over five years, United Rentals (URI) compounded fastest (Lyft (LYFT) -18.6%/yr, United Rentals (URI) +26.0%/yr, DoorDash (DASH) -2.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: United Rentals (URI) 0.66%. Lyft (LYFT) and DoorDash (DASH) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, United Rentals (URI) has been the steadiest (Lyft (LYFT) 47.9%, United Rentals (URI) 42.3%, DoorDash (DASH) 50.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LYFT, URI and DASH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, United Rentals (URI) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.