LYFT vs BIPH vs MRT Stock Comparison

Lyft, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners and Marti Technologies Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LYFT Lyft, Inc.
$17.06 +14.8% 1M -16.7% 1Y
Market cap
$6.39B
P/E
2.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.77B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
3 wins
MRT Marti Technologies, Inc.
$2.00 -6.5% 1M -17.0% 1Y
Market cap
$154.27M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$52.32M
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
1 win

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Brookfield Infrastructure Partners 6, Lyft 3, Marti Technologies 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLYFTBIPHMRTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.39B $9.59B $154.27M BIPH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 2.2x -25.6x -3.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 29.9x 25.8x — BIPH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.8% +16.4% +174.4% MRT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 42.3% -1.5% -74.9% LYFT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.0% 6.6% — BIPH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -25.9x 6.1x -7.2x LYFT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.18% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -16.7% -11.3% -17.0% BIPH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -18.3%/yr -9.9%/yr -27.4%/yr BIPH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 48.0% 13.9% 56.1% BIPH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 70/100 46/100 25/100 LYFT

Percentile Scorecard

LYFTBIPHMRT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLYFTBIPHMRT
Valuation 81 #33 of 167 64 #50 of 136 9 #152 of 167
Growth 89 #18 of 153 87 #17 of 122 59 #64 of 153
Profitability 56 #68 of 153 38 #72 of 116 16 #128 of 153
Financial Health 46 #98 of 179 13 #126 of 144 15 #153 of 179
Shareholder Returns 80 #20 of 94 31 #57 of 82 –
Overall 70 46 25
  • LYFT ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • BIPH ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • MRT ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLYFTBIPHMRTSPY
1 month +14.8%-1.3%-6.5% -0.8%
3 months +13.1%-6.0%+7.5% +3.5%
6 months +17.7%-8.1%-6.1% +7.0%
Year to date -11.9%-6.5%-15.6% +12.2%
1 year -16.7%-11.3%-17.0% +13.0%
3 years +84.2%+2.9%+300.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year +22.6%+1.0%+58.8% +23.1%
5 years -63.5%-40.7%-79.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year -18.3%-9.9%-27.4% +11.0%

Risk

MeasureLYFTBIPHMRTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 48.0%13.9%56.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 53.9%15.7%56.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.390.100.02 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.35-0.81-0.30 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -85.8%-43.5%-96.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -30.6%-12.5%-24.0% -1.8%
52-week high $24.57$17.40$2.63 $779.14
52-week low $12.65$15.08$1.30 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLYFTBIPHMRT
P/E now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 17.5x -25.7xmedian 16.1x -4.0xmedian 17.5x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 1.4x 0.4xmedian 1.0x 3.3xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 182.3xmedian 14.5x 7.0xmedian 8.7x -20.4xmedian 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.8xmedian 12.1x -12.1xmedian 11.5x -8.7xmedian 12.1x
P/B now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 1.7x 0.3xmedian 1.2x -2.1xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.04median 0.41 —median 0.81 -0.11median 0.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLYFTBIPHMRT
Revenue $6.77B $25.06B $52.32M
Gross profit $3.08B $6.65B $33.36M
Operating income -$119.72M $6.20B -$16.33M
Net income $2.87B $2.39B -$70.58M
Free cash flow $1.11B -$792.00M -$19.81M
R&D $472.97M – $3.04M
EPS (diluted) $7.42 – $-0.50
Cash & equivalents $1.14B $3.09B $12.50M
Total debt $990.56M $67.76B $106.33M
Shares (diluted) 386.33M – 78.05M
Enterprise value -$954.55M -$3.98B $124.99M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLYFTBIPHMRT
P/E 2.3x -25.7x -4.0x
P/FCF 5.8x -12.1x -8.7x
P/Operating cash flow 5.4x 1.5x -8.6x
P/S 1.0x 0.4x 3.3x
P/B 2.1x 0.3x -2.1x
P/Tangible book 2.3x 0.5x -2.0x
EV/EBITDA 182.3x 7.0x -20.4x
EV/EBIT -47.2x 11.9x -16.3x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 2.9x 5.1x
EV/FCF 5.1x -93.3x -13.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 4.7x 11.7x -13.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.04 – -0.11

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLYFTBIPHMRT
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.8% 16.4% 174.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 16.8% 16.6% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 20.9% 16.9% 5,402%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 20.8% 48.1% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -117.1% 17.8% 45.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 54.4% 28.4% –
Net income growth (1Y) 3,009% 63.4% 38.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 61.1% 15.0% -38.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 3,303% – 60.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 60.8% – 35.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 14.0% 30.9% 44.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 98.9% 26.0% -20.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 12.0% 72.5% 45.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 72.6% 8.5% -20.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLYFTBIPHMRT
Gross margin 45.5% 26.5% 63.8%
EBITDA margin 0.5% 41.9% -24.9%
Operating margin -1.8% 24.8% -31.2%
Pretax margin -0.1% 11.8% -74.9%
Net margin 42.3% -1.5% -74.9%
FCF margin 16.4% -3.2% -37.9%
Operating cash flow margin 17.6% 25.1% -38.2%
Return on equity 94.7% 7.2% –
Return on assets 31.8% 1.9% -136.6%
Return on invested capital 0.0% 6.6% –
Return on capital employed -2.9% 5.6% -105.8%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.2x 1.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.4x 2.6x 0.3x
Stock comp / revenue 4.6% – 17.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLYFTBIPHMRT
Debt / assets 10.9% 55.6% 328.6%
Debt / equity 0.3x 2.1x -1.3x
Net debt / EBITDA -25.9x 6.1x -7.2x
Debt / FCF 0.9x -85.6x -5.4x
Liabilities / assets 66.8% 73.3% 359.1%
Equity / assets 33.2% 26.7% -259.1%
Interest coverage -5.9x 1.1x –
Current ratio 0.6x 0.9x 1.4x
Quick ratio 0.4x 0.7x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.3x 0.9x
Altman Z-score -0.06 – -7.68

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLYFTBIPHMRT
Dividend yield – 0.0% –
Net buyback yield 10.7% – –
Shareholder yield 10.7% 0.0% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 71.4% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – -215.5% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 10.5% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 40.3% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLYFTBIPHMRT
Forward P/E 29.9xFY2026 25.8xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.57FY2026 $0.59FY2026 $-0.32FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -91.6%FY2026 -34.4%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +80.7% +88.1% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.97BFY2026 $17.63BFY2026 $82.00MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +10.3%FY2026 -23.7%FY2026 +109.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.1% -44.6% +72.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLYFTBIPHMRT
Held by institutions 100.0% – –
Institutions holding 528 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.2% – –
Institutions buying 260 – –
Institutions selling 175 – –
Buyers to sellers 1.49 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LYFTBIPHMRT
LYFT 1.00 0.07 -0.10
BIPH 0.07 1.00 0.01
MRT -0.10 0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LYFT, BIPH and MRT?

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lyft (LYFT) $6.39B, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) $9.59B, Marti Technologies (MRT) $154.27M.

Which company is growing faster?

Marti Technologies (MRT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lyft (LYFT) +10.8%, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) +16.4%, Marti Technologies (MRT) +174.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lyft (LYFT) has the highest net margin (Lyft (LYFT) 42.3%, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) -1.5%, Marti Technologies (MRT) -74.9%). On return on invested capital, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) leads (Lyft (LYFT) 0.0%, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) 6.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) returned the most: Lyft (LYFT) -16.7%, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) -11.3%, Marti Technologies (MRT) -17.0%. Over five years, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) compounded fastest (Lyft (LYFT) -18.3%/yr, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) -9.9%/yr, Marti Technologies (MRT) -27.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Lyft (LYFT) 0.00%, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) 0.18%, Marti Technologies (MRT) 0.00%. Lyft (LYFT) and Marti Technologies (MRT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) has been the steadiest (Lyft (LYFT) 48.0%, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) 13.9%, Marti Technologies (MRT) 56.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LYFT, BIPH and MRT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.