LYB vs WLKP Stock Comparison

LyondellBasell Industries and Westlake Chemical Partners Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Westlake Chemical Partners leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Westlake Chemical Partners 8, LyondellBasell Industries 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLYBWLKPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $43.50B $750.73M LYB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -123.2x 13.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 7.1x 14.4x LYB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -1.7% +12.1% WLKP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -1.1% 4.7% WLKP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.1% 30.1% WLKP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.3x 0.7x WLKP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.03% 0.09% WLKP
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +41.5% +6.3% LYB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -6.5%/yr -4.0%/yr WLKP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.8% 18.5% WLKP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 39/100 85/100 WLKP

Percentile Scorecard

LYBWLKP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLYBWLKP
Valuation 40 #57 of 94 99 #2 of 94
Growth 24 #70 of 92 56 #41 of 92
Profitability 53 #42 of 89 100 #1 of 89
Financial Health 31 #67 of 97 84 #16 of 97
Shareholder Returns 45 #39 of 70 87 #10 of 70
Overall 39 85
  • LYB ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • WLKP ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLYBWLKPSPY
1 month +15.8%-1.9% -0.8%
3 months +14.8%-2.9% +3.5%
6 months -5.2%-6.3% +7.0%
Year to date +55.5%+11.2% +12.2%
1 year +41.5%+6.3% +13.0%
3 years -25.5%-0.8% +86.3%
3 years, per year -9.4%-0.3% +23.1%
5 years -28.7%-18.4% +68.6%
5 years, per year -6.5%-4.0% +11.0%
10 years -16.2%-0.1% +258.0%
10 years, per year -1.8%0.0% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureLYBWLKPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.8%18.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 40.8%17.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.590.21 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.970.34 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -63.9%-38.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -18.3%-11.0% -1.8%
52-week high $82.38$23.72 $779.14
52-week low $42.28$17.87 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLYBWLKP
P/E now vs peer median -123.2xmedian 21.6x 12.9xmedian 21.6x
P/S now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.4x 0.6xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 22.4xmedian 12.4x 2.2xmedian 12.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 27.6xmedian 15.8x 1.8xmedian 15.8x
P/B now vs peer median 4.1xmedian 1.6x 1.0xmedian 1.6x
PEG now vs peer median 4.18median 1.66 —median 1.66

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLYBWLKP
Revenue $31.19B $1.23B
Gross profit $3.98B $384.80M
Operating income $963.00M $355.62M
Net income -$346.00M $334.49M
Free cash flow $1.58B $409.14M
R&D $137.00M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.55 –
Cash & equivalents $2.63B $49.32M
Total debt $12.91B $1.60B
Shares (diluted) 646.00M –
Enterprise value $33.00B $574.92M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLYBWLKP
P/E -123.2x 12.9x
P/FCF 27.6x 1.8x
P/Operating cash flow 14.6x 1.6x
P/S 1.4x 0.6x
P/B 4.1x 1.0x
P/Tangible book 4.2x 1.0x
EV/EBITDA 22.4x 2.2x
EV/EBIT 55.8x 3.1x
EV/Revenue 1.7x 0.9x
EV/FCF 34.1x 2.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 18.1x 2.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 4.18 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLYBWLKP
Revenue growth (1Y) -1.7% 12.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -10.2% -3.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 15.6% 4.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -6.3% 0.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 44.4% 4.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -31.7% 0.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -232.1% 4.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -29.3% -0.2%
EPS growth (1Y) -238.0% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -29.4% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 26.1% 48.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -14.7% -1.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 240.8% 67.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -21.2% -2.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLYBWLKP
Gross margin 12.8% 31.2%
EBITDA margin 7.7% 40.0%
Operating margin 3.1% 28.8%
Pretax margin -0.2% 27.1%
Net margin -1.1% 4.7%
FCF margin 5.1% 33.1%
Operating cash flow margin 9.5% 37.7%
Return on equity -3.3% 42.8%
Return on assets -1.0% 27.3%
Return on invested capital 4.1% 30.1%
Return on capital employed 3.6% 30.1%
Asset turnover 0.9x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -8.6x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.3% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLYBWLKP
Debt / assets 37.4% 32.8%
Debt / equity 1.2x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.3x 0.7x
Debt / FCF 8.2x 1.0x
Liabilities / assets 69.0% 36.8%
Equity / assets 31.0% 63.2%
Interest coverage 1.8x 16.4x
Current ratio 1.6x 3.4x
Quick ratio 0.9x 1.9x
Cash ratio 0.4x 1.1x
Altman Z-score 2.54 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLYBWLKP
Dividend yield 5.1% 8.9%
Net buyback yield – –
Shareholder yield 5.1% 8.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) -385.5% 19.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) 84.5% 16.2%
Dividend growth (1Y) -23.9% 0.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -5.5% 0.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLYBWLKP
Forward P/E 7.1xFY2026 14.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $9.42FY2026 $1.47FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +454.1%FY2026 +6.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -30.1% +20.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $32.43BFY2026 $1.31BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +7.6%FY2026 +11.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.8% +16.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLYBWLKP
Held by institutions 37.4% 29.1%
Institutions holding 878 56
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.9% -0.2%
Institutions buying 469 26
Institutions selling 297 13
Buyers to sellers 1.58 2.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LYBWLKP
LYB 1.00 0.20
WLKP 0.20 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LYB and WLKP?

LyondellBasell Industries (LYB) is the largest by market capitalisation: LyondellBasell Industries (LYB) $43.50B, Westlake Chemical Partners (WLKP) $750.73M.

Which company is growing faster?

Westlake Chemical Partners (WLKP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: LyondellBasell Industries (LYB) -1.7%, Westlake Chemical Partners (WLKP) +12.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Westlake Chemical Partners (WLKP) has the highest net margin (LyondellBasell Industries (LYB) -1.1%, Westlake Chemical Partners (WLKP) 4.7%). On return on invested capital, Westlake Chemical Partners (WLKP) leads (LyondellBasell Industries (LYB) 4.1%, Westlake Chemical Partners (WLKP) 30.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year LyondellBasell Industries (LYB) returned the most: LyondellBasell Industries (LYB) +41.5%, Westlake Chemical Partners (WLKP) +6.3%. Over five years, Westlake Chemical Partners (WLKP) compounded fastest (LyondellBasell Industries (LYB) -6.5%/yr, Westlake Chemical Partners (WLKP) -4.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Westlake Chemical Partners (WLKP) has the highest dividend yield: LyondellBasell Industries (LYB) 0.03%, Westlake Chemical Partners (WLKP) 0.09%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Westlake Chemical Partners (WLKP) has been the steadiest (LyondellBasell Industries (LYB) 42.8%, Westlake Chemical Partners (WLKP) 18.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do LYB and WLKP move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.20, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, LYB and WLKP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Westlake Chemical Partners (WLKP) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.