LXP vs OMAB vs TRNO Stock Comparison

LXP Industrial Trust, Central North Airport and Terreno Realty Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LXP LXP Industrial Trust
$61.15 +0.4% 1M +28.5% 1Y
Market cap
$3.61B
P/E
31.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$351.59M
Div. yield
3.43%
Industrial REITs Real Estate
1 win
TRNO Terreno Realty Corp
$65.09 -1.6% 1M +6.5% 1Y
Market cap
$7.01B
P/E
17.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$502.88M
Div. yield
3.27%
Industrial REITs Real Estate
5 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Terreno Realty leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Terreno Realty 5, Central North Airport 4, LXP Industrial Trust 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLXPOMABTRNOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.61B $4.78B $7.01B TRNO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 31.2x 16.1x 17.9x OMAB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 1,019x 15.0x 31.6x OMAB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -3.5% — +18.0% TRNO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 32.4% — 76.9% TRNO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.2% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.0x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 3.43% 5.46% 3.27% OMAB
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +28.5% -3.4% +6.5% LXP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -3.7%/yr +15.3%/yr -2.5%/yr OMAB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 20.3% 31.1% 19.7% TRNO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 46/100 55/100 TRNO

Percentile Scorecard

LXPOMABTRNO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLXPOMABTRNO
Valuation 40 #87 of 145 30 #96 of 136 7 #135 of 145
Growth 24 #108 of 141 – 89 #17 of 141
Profitability 79 #29 of 134 – 28 #97 of 134
Financial Health 93 #11 of 138 35 #94 of 143 98 #4 of 138
Shareholder Returns 34 #87 of 131 74 #22 of 82 53 #62 of 131
Overall 54 46 55
  • LXP ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • OMAB ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • TRNO ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLXPOMABTRNOSPY
1 month +0.4%-3.9%-1.6% -0.2%
3 months +0.5%-8.5%-10.8% +3.9%
6 months +19.9%-6.4%-1.5% +8.2%
Year to date +23.3%-8.9%+10.9% +12.9%
1 year +28.5%-3.4%+6.5% +12.3%
3 years +56.2%+74.5%+27.8% +87.4%
3 years, per year +16.0%+20.4%+8.5% +23.3%
5 years -17.3%+103.7%-11.8% +67.9%
5 years, per year -3.7%+15.3%-2.5% +10.9%
10 years +23.7%+105.1%+155.1% +261.1%
10 years, per year +2.1%+7.4%+9.8% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLXPOMABTRNOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 20.3%31.1%19.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 22.9%28.1%20.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.301.120.35 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.40-0.110.33 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -55.0%-42.1%-40.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-26.6%-13.3% -1.2%
52-week high $61.15$134.98$75.07 $779.14
52-week low $45.48$88.75$57.13 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLXPOMABTRNO
P/E now vs peer median 31.2xmedian 26.3x 16.1xmedian 16.3x 17.9xmedian 26.3x
P/S now vs peer median 10.3xmedian 4.0x 5.4xmedian 1.0x 13.9xmedian 4.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.3xmedian 14.4x —median 8.7x —median 14.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -222.4xmedian 23.3x 11.8xmedian 11.4x -10.2xmedian 23.3x
P/B now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 1.3x 7.5xmedian 1.2x 1.6xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.94median 1.91 —median 0.82 0.64median 1.91

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLXPOMABTRNO
Revenue $351.59M – $502.88M
Gross profit $286.28M – –
Operating income $241.15M – –
Net income $120.45M – $388.59M
Free cash flow -$16.21M – -$686.58M
EPS (diluted) $1.94 – $3.63
Cash & equivalents $110.31M $172.32M $51.21M
Total debt $953.93M $1.84B $3.85B
Shares (diluted) 58.67M – 106.67M
Enterprise value $3.18B $4.27B $6.82B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLXPOMABTRNO
P/E 31.2x 16.1x 17.9x
P/FCF -222.4x 11.8x -10.2x
P/Operating cash flow 19.3x – 24.5x
P/S 10.3x 5.4x 13.9x
P/B 1.8x 7.5x 1.6x
P/Tangible book 1.8x -9.6x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA 10.3x – –
EV/EBIT 18.4x – –
EV/Revenue 12.7x – 15.7x
EV/FCF -274.5x – -11.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 23.8x – 27.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.94 – 0.64

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLXPOMABTRNO
Revenue growth (1Y) -3.5% – 18.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.3% – 18.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -4.9% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 0.7% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -7.8% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -0.4% – –
Net income growth (1Y) -1.2% – 52.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 28.6% – 38.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 2.6% – 47.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 33.3% – 27.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -13.5% – 17.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -1.2% – 19.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 51.5% – -78.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -77.1% – -16.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLXPOMABTRNO
Gross margin 81.4% – –
EBITDA margin 122.9% – –
Operating margin 68.6% – –
Pretax margin 36.1% – –
Net margin 32.4% – 76.9%
FCF margin -4.6% – -136.5%
Operating cash flow margin 53.1% – 57.0%
Return on equity 6.0% – –
Return on assets 3.5% – –
Return on invested capital 8.2% – –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.1x – 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x – 0.7x
Stock comp / revenue – – 3.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLXPOMABTRNO
Debt / assets 27.2% 43.4% 16.5%
Debt / equity 0.5x 1.2x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.0x – –
Debt / FCF -58.9x – -1.4x
Liabilities / assets 41.6% 63.1% 22.4%
Equity / assets 58.4% 36.9% 77.6%
Interest coverage 4.5x – –
Current ratio – 1.3x –
Quick ratio – 1.2x –
Cash ratio – 0.7x –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLXPOMABTRNO
Dividend yield 3.4% 5.5% 3.3%
Net buyback yield 0.5% – -4.4%
Shareholder yield 4.0% 5.5% -1.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 55.0%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – -31.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 11.4%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 21.2%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLXPOMABTRNO
Forward P/E 1,019xFY2026 15.0xFY2026 31.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.06FY2026 $6.60FY2026 $2.06FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -96.7%FY2026 +3.3%FY2026 -47.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +816.7% +28.5% -8.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $322.52MFY2026 $933.64MFY2026 $544.31MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -6.8%FY2026 +1.1%FY2026 +14.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +10.0% +19.6% +1.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLXPOMABTRNO
Held by institutions 95.2% 12.3% 100.0%
Institutions holding 317 163 384
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.6% +5.4% +3.0%
Institutions buying 152 77 202
Institutions selling 114 59 126
Buyers to sellers 1.33 1.31 1.60

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LXPOMABTRNO
LXP 1.00 0.19 0.51
OMAB 0.19 1.00 0.15
TRNO 0.51 0.15 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LXP, OMAB and TRNO?

Terreno Realty (TRNO) is the largest by market capitalisation: LXP Industrial Trust (LXP) $3.61B, Central North Airport (OMAB) $4.78B, Terreno Realty (TRNO) $7.01B.

Which stock is cheaper, LXP, OMAB and TRNO?

Central North Airport (OMAB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (LXP Industrial Trust (LXP) 31.2x, Central North Airport (OMAB) 16.1x, Terreno Realty (TRNO) 17.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Central North Airport (OMAB) is cheapest (LXP Industrial Trust (LXP) 1,019x, Central North Airport (OMAB) 15.0x, Terreno Realty (TRNO) 31.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Terreno Realty (TRNO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: LXP Industrial Trust (LXP) -3.5%, Terreno Realty (TRNO) +18.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Terreno Realty (TRNO) has the highest net margin (LXP Industrial Trust (LXP) 32.4%, Terreno Realty (TRNO) 76.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year LXP Industrial Trust (LXP) returned the most: LXP Industrial Trust (LXP) +28.5%, Central North Airport (OMAB) -3.4%, Terreno Realty (TRNO) +6.5%. Over five years, Central North Airport (OMAB) compounded fastest (LXP Industrial Trust (LXP) -3.7%/yr, Central North Airport (OMAB) +15.3%/yr, Terreno Realty (TRNO) -2.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Central North Airport (OMAB) has the highest dividend yield: LXP Industrial Trust (LXP) 3.43%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 5.46%, Terreno Realty (TRNO) 3.27%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Terreno Realty (TRNO) has been the steadiest (LXP Industrial Trust (LXP) 20.3%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 31.1%, Terreno Realty (TRNO) 19.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LXP, OMAB and TRNO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Terreno Realty (TRNO) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.