LXFR vs CSTM vs LCII Stock Comparison

Luxfer Holdings, Constellium Se and Lci Industries Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LXFR Luxfer Holdings Plc
$17.31 +0.4% 1M +36.8% 1Y
Market cap
$463.21M
P/E
74.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$355.20M
Div. yield
–
Metal Fabrication Industrials
2 wins
CSTM Constellium Se
$20.93 -17.9% 1M +33.5% 1Y
Market cap
$2.96B
P/E
5.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.05B
Div. yield
–
Metal Fabrication Industrials
9 wins
LCII Lci Industries
$102.54 +24.7% 1M -7.2% 1Y
Market cap
$2.39B
P/E
12.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.98B
Div. yield
–
Metal Fabrication Industrials

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Constellium Se leads on 9 of the 12 questions below (Constellium Se 9, Luxfer Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLXFRCSTMLCIILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $463.21M $2.96B $2.39B CSTM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 74.7x 5.2x 12.0x CSTM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 17.5x 4.9x 12.5x CSTM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -11.8% +26.1% -0.2% CSTM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.7% 5.7% 5.0% CSTM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.2% 26.9% 9.7% CSTM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.2x 1.1x 1.4x CSTM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +36.8% +33.5% -7.2% LXFR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -4.7%/yr +1.3%/yr -7.4%/yr CSTM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 32.4% 45.6% 37.3% LXFR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 51/100 75/100 69/100 CSTM

Percentile Scorecard

LXFRCSTMLCII

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLXFRCSTMLCII
Valuation 53 #96 of 204 98 #5 of 204 97 #8 of 204
Growth 18 #156 of 191 100 #2 of 191 50 #97 of 191
Profitability 37 #120 of 189 67 #64 of 189 61 #74 of 189
Financial Health 67 #73 of 221 22 #173 of 221 52 #107 of 221
Shareholder Returns 79 #35 of 159 91 #15 of 159 87 #22 of 159
Overall 51 75 69
  • LXFR ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • CSTM ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • LCII ranked among 223 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLXFRCSTMLCIISPY
1 month +0.4%-17.9%+24.7% -5.9%
3 months +1.3%-26.8%-3.1% -4.6%
6 months +11.5%-36.3%-11.9% +0.2%
Year to date +27.9%+11.0%-15.5% +7.5%
1 year +36.8%+33.5%-7.2% +8.2%
3 years +101.3%+23.4%-9.1% +68.3%
3 years, per year +26.3%+7.3%-3.1% +19.0%
5 years -21.4%+6.8%-31.9% +56.5%
5 years, per year -4.7%+1.3%-7.4% +9.4%
10 years —+294.9%+18.4% +251.5%
10 years, per year —+14.7%+1.7% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureLXFRCSTMLCIISPY
Volatility, 1Y 32.4%45.6%37.3% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 37.9%43.9%36.3% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.801.920.81 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.140.73-0.19 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.3%-66.3%-53.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -9.3%-42.1%-34.7% -5.9%
52-week high $19.08$36.15$157.13 $779.14
52-week low $11.51$14.75$78.16 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLXFRCSTMLCII
P/E now vs peer median 74.7xmedian 23.4x 4.9xmedian 23.4x 12.5xmedian 23.4x
P/S now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 1.7x 0.3xmedian 1.7x 0.6xmedian 1.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.6xmedian 13.4x 2.9xmedian 13.4x 7.3xmedian 13.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 24.5xmedian 21.9x 8.8xmedian 21.9x 9.6xmedian 21.9x
P/B now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 2.1x 2.1xmedian 2.1x 1.7xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 56.62median 1.02 —median 1.02 0.20median 1.02

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLXFRCSTMLCII
Revenue $355.20M $10.05B $3.98B
Gross profit $89.00M $1.61B $1.04B
Operating income $22.40M $1.20B $301.50M
Net income $6.20M $576.00M $198.86M
Free cash flow $18.90M $319.00M $259.70M
R&D $5.60M $53.00M –
EPS (diluted) $0.23 $4.13 $8.14
Cash & equivalents $19.90M $158.00M $245.62M
Total debt $57.70M $1.82B $852.40M
Shares (diluted) 27.30M 138.99M 24.42M
Enterprise value $408.71M $2.38B $1.57B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLXFRCSTMLCII
P/E 74.7x 4.9x 12.5x
P/FCF 24.5x 8.8x 9.6x
P/Operating cash flow 15.4x 4.4x 7.9x
P/S 1.3x 0.3x 0.6x
P/B 2.1x 2.1x 1.7x
P/Tangible book 2.2x 2.2x 2.3x
EV/EBITDA 15.6x 2.9x 7.3x
EV/EBIT 22.4x 3.7x 10.3x
EV/Revenue 1.4x 0.4x 0.8x
EV/FCF 26.5x 14.0x 11.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 16.7x 7.0x 9.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 56.62 – 0.20

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLXFRCSTMLCII
Revenue growth (1Y) -11.8% 26.1% -0.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -5.9% – 1.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -3.1% 54.0% 10.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 2.9% – 11.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 0.0% 82.1% 15.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -4.2% – 45.6%
Net income growth (1Y) -56.6% 400.9% 11.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 1.7% – 59.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -56.9% 413.6% 11.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 1.3% – 61.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -31.4% 92.2% -11.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 0.7% – -14.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -47.6% 897.5% -16.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 0.2% – -15.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLXFRCSTMLCII
Gross margin 25.1% 16.1% 26.2%
EBITDA margin 9.1% 15.3% 10.6%
Operating margin 6.3% 11.9% 7.6%
Pretax margin 5.2% 8.1% 6.8%
Net margin 1.7% 5.7% 5.0%
FCF margin 5.3% 3.2% 6.5%
Operating cash flow margin 8.4% 6.3% 7.9%
Return on equity 2.8% 44.4% 13.8%
Return on assets 1.6% 9.7% 6.1%
Return on invested capital 5.2% 26.9% 9.7%
Return on capital employed 7.3% 31.0% 11.1%
Asset turnover 0.9x 1.7x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 4.8x 1.1x 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% – 0.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLXFRCSTMLCII
Debt / assets 15.1% 31.0% 26.6%
Debt / equity 0.3x 1.4x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.2x 1.1x 1.4x
Debt / FCF 3.1x 5.7x 3.3x
Liabilities / assets 42.1% 77.1% 54.4%
Equity / assets 57.9% 22.9% 45.6%
Interest coverage 6.6x 11.0x –
Current ratio 2.5x 1.5x 2.8x
Quick ratio 1.1x 0.6x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.1x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 3.57 3.16 3.37

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLXFRCSTMLCII
Dividend yield 2.3% – 4.5%
Net buyback yield 0.6% 4.2% 0.3%
Shareholder yield 2.8% 4.2% 4.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLXFRCSTMLCII
Forward P/E 17.5xFY2026 4.9xFY2026 12.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.99FY2026 $4.25FY2026 $8.18FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -10.8%FY2026 +242.7%FY2026 +9.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +41.4% -33.2% +18.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $386.72MFY2026 $10.83BFY2026 $4.16BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +4.2%FY2026 +28.1%FY2026 +1.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +2.6% -0.1% +4.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLXFRCSTMLCII
Held by institutions 91.6% 88.6% 100.0%
Institutions holding 138 387 360
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.6% -4.5% -3.1%
Institutions buying 76 255 181
Institutions selling 42 109 123
Buyers to sellers 1.81 2.34 1.47

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LXFRCSTMLCII
LXFR 1.00 0.33 0.26
CSTM 0.33 1.00 0.22
LCII 0.26 0.22 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LXFR, CSTM and LCII?

Constellium Se (CSTM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) $463.21M, Constellium Se (CSTM) $2.96B, Lci Industries (LCII) $2.39B.

Which stock is cheaper, LXFR, CSTM and LCII?

Constellium Se (CSTM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 74.7x, Constellium Se (CSTM) 5.2x, Lci Industries (LCII) 12.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Constellium Se (CSTM) is cheapest (Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 17.5x, Constellium Se (CSTM) 4.9x, Lci Industries (LCII) 12.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Constellium Se (CSTM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) -11.8%, Constellium Se (CSTM) +26.1%, Lci Industries (LCII) -0.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Constellium Se (CSTM) has the highest net margin (Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 1.7%, Constellium Se (CSTM) 5.7%, Lci Industries (LCII) 5.0%). On return on invested capital, Constellium Se (CSTM) leads (Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 5.2%, Constellium Se (CSTM) 26.9%, Lci Industries (LCII) 9.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) returned the most: Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) +36.8%, Constellium Se (CSTM) +33.5%, Lci Industries (LCII) -7.2%. Over five years, Constellium Se (CSTM) compounded fastest (Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) -4.7%/yr, Constellium Se (CSTM) +1.3%/yr, Lci Industries (LCII) -7.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) has been the steadiest (Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 32.4%, Constellium Se (CSTM) 45.6%, Lci Industries (LCII) 37.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LXFR, CSTM and LCII?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Constellium Se (CSTM) leads on 9. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.