LWLG vs Q vs SNPS Stock Comparison

Lightwave Logic, Qnity Electronics and Synopsys Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LWLG Lightwave Logic, Inc.
$4.60 -13.4% 1M -5.9% 1Y
Market cap
$721.35M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Specialty Chemicals Basic Materials
Q Qnity Electronics, Inc.
$118.78 -4.7% 1M +24.6% 1Y
Market cap
$25.62B
P/E
43.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.21B
Div. yield
0.00%
Specialty Chemicals Basic Materials
6 wins
SNPS Synopsys Inc
$474.42 +11.4% 1M +1.9% 1Y
Market cap
$92.03B
P/E
70.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.88B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor EDA Software Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Qnity Electronics leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Qnity Electronics 6, Synopsys 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLWLGQSNPSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $721.35M $25.62B $92.03B SNPS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 43.7x 70.7x Q
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 27.3x 32.6x Q
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +14.8% +38.0% SNPS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 11.2% 14.7% SNPS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 8.3% 1.8% Q
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.8x 2.8x Q
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -5.9% +24.6% +1.9% Q
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -16.7%/yr — +7.7%/yr SNPS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 118.6% 55.2% 44.7% SNPS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 60/100 39/100 Q

Percentile Scorecard

LWLGQSNPS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLWLGQSNPS
Valuation – 37 #60 of 94 42 #55 of 94
Growth – 52 #44 of 91 48 #48 of 92
Profitability – 87 #12 of 86 47 #48 of 90
Financial Health – 68 #31 of 95 18 #81 of 99
Shareholder Returns 4 #67 of 70 54 #33 of 70 –
Overall – 60 39
  • LWLG ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • Q ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • SNPS ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLWLGQSNPSSPY
1 month -13.4%-4.7%+11.4% -0.2%
3 months -20.1%-7.1%+23.6% +3.9%
6 months -60.2%-13.7%-2.0% +8.2%
Year to date +42.0%+45.5%+1.0% +12.9%
1 year -5.9%+24.6%+1.9% +12.3%
3 years -3.8%—+3.8% +87.4%
3 years, per year -1.3%—+1.3% +23.3%
5 years -60.0%—+45.2% +67.9%
5 years, per year -16.7%—+7.7% +10.9%
10 years +666.7%—+713.3% +261.1%
10 years, per year +22.6%—+23.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLWLGQSNPSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 118.6%55.2%44.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 113.3%58.5%42.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.692.651.68 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.050.450.04 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -95.8%-38.1%-42.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -74.8%-32.4%-11.3% -1.2%
52-week high $18.22$175.64$534.56 $779.14
52-week low $2.97$73.54$372.33 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLWLGQSNPS
P/E now vs peer median —median 22.0x 42.5xmedian 22.0x 69.8xmedian 45.6x
P/S now vs peer median —median 1.4x 4.8xmedian 1.4x 10.2xmedian 7.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.4x 16.2xmedian 12.4x 42.1xmedian 29.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 15.1x 30.1xmedian 15.1x —median 40.6x
P/B now vs peer median —median 1.6x 3.3xmedian 1.6x 2.9xmedian 4.6x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.66 —median 1.66 147.37median 2.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLWLGQSNPS
Revenue – $5.21B $8.88B
Gross profit – $2.41B $6.53B
Operating income – $1.34B $847.20M
Net income – $630.00M $1.30B
Free cash flow – $825.00M –
R&D – $374.00M $2.81B
EPS (diluted) – $2.79 $6.77
Cash & equivalents – $961.00M $3.61B
Total debt – $4.02B $10.04B
Shares (diluted) 153.48M 210.20M 192.32M
Enterprise value $721.35M $22.76B $88.42B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLWLGQSNPS
P/E – 42.5x 69.8x
P/FCF – 30.1x –
P/Operating cash flow – 21.3x –
P/S – 4.8x 10.2x
P/B – 3.3x 2.9x
P/Tangible book – 3.8x 4.6x
EV/EBITDA – 16.2x 42.1x
EV/EBIT – 20.9x 114.9x
EV/Revenue – 5.4x 11.0x
EV/FCF – 33.8x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 23.9x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – 147.37

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLWLGQSNPS
Revenue growth (1Y) – 14.8% 38.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 22.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 13.3% 28.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 18.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 11.6% -23.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – -7.0%
Net income growth (1Y) – -23.6% -34.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – 8.0%
EPS growth (1Y) – -26.4% -45.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – 0.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLWLGQSNPS
Gross margin – 46.2% 73.5%
EBITDA margin – 33.0% 26.0%
Operating margin – 25.6% 9.5%
Pretax margin – 16.9% 16.5%
Net margin – 11.2% 14.7%
FCF margin – 15.8% –
Operating cash flow margin – 22.4% –
Return on equity – 8.4% 4.2%
Return on assets – 4.4% 2.7%
Return on invested capital – 8.3% 1.8%
Return on capital employed – 10.5% 2.0%
Asset turnover – 0.4x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.9x –
Stock comp / revenue – 0.7% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLWLGQSNPS
Debt / assets – 28.1% 21.0%
Debt / equity – 0.5x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.8x 2.8x
Debt / FCF – 4.9x –
Liabilities / assets – 47.3% 34.7%
Equity / assets – 52.7% 65.3%
Interest coverage – 7.1x 1.3x
Current ratio – 2.0x 1.3x
Quick ratio – 1.5x 1.0x
Cash ratio – 0.7x 0.7x
Altman Z-score – 3.02 3.90

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLWLGQSNPS
Dividend yield – 0.3% –
Net buyback yield -8.1% 0.2% –
Shareholder yield -8.1% 0.5% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – 5.4% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 4.1% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLWLGQSNPS
Forward P/E – 27.3xFY2026 32.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $4.35FY2026 $14.56FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +29.9%FY2026 +12.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +21.8% +21.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $5.34BFY2026 $10.20BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +12.5%FY2026 +44.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +23.3% +12.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLWLGQSNPS
Held by institutions 37.8% 77.2% 92.3%
Institutions holding 173 1,325 1,440
Change in shares held, QoQ +39.6% +4.4% +5.6%
Institutions buying 122 658 772
Institutions selling 30 439 493
Buyers to sellers 4.07 1.50 1.57

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LWLGQSNPS
LWLG 1.00 0.41 0.20
Q 0.41 1.00 0.37
SNPS 0.20 0.37 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LWLG, Q and SNPS?

Synopsys (SNPS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lightwave Logic (LWLG) $721.35M, Qnity Electronics (Q) $25.62B, Synopsys (SNPS) $92.03B.

Which stock is cheaper, LWLG, Q and SNPS?

Qnity Electronics (Q) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Qnity Electronics (Q) 43.7x, Synopsys (SNPS) 70.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Qnity Electronics (Q) is cheapest (Qnity Electronics (Q) 27.3x, Synopsys (SNPS) 32.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Synopsys (SNPS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Qnity Electronics (Q) +14.8%, Synopsys (SNPS) +38.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Synopsys (SNPS) has the highest net margin (Qnity Electronics (Q) 11.2%, Synopsys (SNPS) 14.7%). On return on invested capital, Qnity Electronics (Q) leads (Qnity Electronics (Q) 8.3%, Synopsys (SNPS) 1.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Qnity Electronics (Q) returned the most: Lightwave Logic (LWLG) -5.9%, Qnity Electronics (Q) +24.6%, Synopsys (SNPS) +1.9%. Over five years, Synopsys (SNPS) compounded fastest (Lightwave Logic (LWLG) -16.7%/yr, Synopsys (SNPS) +7.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Lightwave Logic (LWLG) 0.00%, Qnity Electronics (Q) 0.00%, Synopsys (SNPS) 0.00%. Lightwave Logic (LWLG) and Synopsys (SNPS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Synopsys (SNPS) has been the steadiest (Lightwave Logic (LWLG) 118.6%, Qnity Electronics (Q) 55.2%, Synopsys (SNPS) 44.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LWLG, Q and SNPS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Qnity Electronics (Q) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.