LVWR vs WGO vs DOO Stock Comparison

LiveWire, Winnebago Industries and Brp Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LVWR LiveWire Group, Inc.
$0.90 -44.4% 1M -83.7% 1Y
Market cap
$145.58M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$33.45M
Div. yield
–
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
1 win
WGO Winnebago Industries Inc
$30.22 +13.3% 1M -18.9% 1Y
Market cap
$857.84M
P/E
24.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.70B
Div. yield
0.05%
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
6 wins
DOO BRP Inc.
$61.61 +7.4% 1M -4.4% 1Y
Market cap
$4.46B
P/E
54.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.74B
Div. yield
–
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Winnebago Industries leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Winnebago Industries 6, Brp 4, LiveWire 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLVWRWGODOOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $145.58M $857.84M $4.46B DOO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -2.0x 24.9x 54.9x WGO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 14.2x 21.9x WGO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +33.4% -3.4% +20.2% LVWR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 1.3% 1.2% WGO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 3.1% 6.0% DOO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.0x 2.1x WGO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.05% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -83.7% -18.9% -4.4% DOO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -38.0%/yr -14.9%/yr -6.9%/yr DOO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 162.3% 45.2% 57.8% WGO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 33/100 70/100 56/100 WGO

Percentile Scorecard

LVWRWGODOO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLVWRWGODOO
Valuation 4 #48 of 50 96 #3 of 50 82 #10 of 50
Growth 88 #7 of 49 29 #35 of 49 52 #24 of 49
Profitability 9 #42 of 46 64 #17 of 46 96 #3 of 46
Financial Health 32 #35 of 51 86 #8 of 51 30 #36 of 51
Shareholder Returns – 75 #8 of 29 21 #23 of 29
Overall 33 70 56
  • LVWR ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • WGO ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • DOO ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLVWRWGODOOSPY
1 month -44.4%+13.3%+7.4% +0.7%
3 months -57.9%-1.0%-1.3% +3.7%
6 months -50.5%-7.3%+10.1% +7.1%
Year to date -79.6%-25.4%-12.9% +12.8%
1 year -83.7%-18.9%-4.4% +11.9%
3 years -91.3%-47.5%-8.2% +85.2%
3 years, per year -55.7%-19.3%-2.8% +22.8%
5 years -90.8%-55.4%-30.1% +67.6%
5 years, per year -38.0%-14.9%-6.9% +10.9%
10 years —+7.4%+208.0% +262.0%
10 years, per year —+0.7%+11.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLVWRWGODOOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 162.3%45.2%57.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 147.5%41.8%70.7% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.130.760.94 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.52-0.42-0.08 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -94.7%-70.7%-65.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -83.7%-39.4%-24.5% -1.2%
52-week high $5.53$49.85$81.64 $779.14
52-week low $0.65$22.68$50.93 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLVWRWGODOO
P/E now vs peer median -2.5xmedian 21.7x 24.7xmedian 21.7x 55.5xmedian 21.7x
P/S now vs peer median 5.5xmedian 0.5x 0.3xmedian 0.5x 0.7xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 8.7x 8.7xmedian 8.7x 9.5xmedian 8.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -6.5xmedian 9.4x 5.9xmedian 9.4x 5.3xmedian 9.4x
P/B now vs peer median -33.5xmedian 1.0x 0.7xmedian 1.0x 18.8xmedian 1.0x
PEG now vs peer median -0.25median 1.36 -0.59median 1.36 -1.09median 1.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLVWRWGODOO
Revenue $33.45M $2.70B $6.74B
Gross profit – $350.20M $1.39B
Operating income -$70.94M $66.20M $283.70M
Net income -$72.58M $34.50M $81.25M
Free cash flow – $144.60M $856.16M
R&D – – $332.77M
EPS (diluted) $-0.35 $1.21 $1.10
Cash & equivalents $39.92M $181.40M $462.34M
Total debt – $443.30M $7.25B
Shares (diluted) 205.04M 28.40M 73.90M
Enterprise value $145.58M $390.24M $2.83B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLVWRWGODOO
P/E -2.5x 24.7x 55.5x
P/FCF -6.5x 5.9x 5.3x
P/Operating cash flow -4.0x 5.1x 4.2x
P/S 5.5x 0.3x 0.7x
P/B -33.5x 0.7x 18.8x
P/Tangible book -19.8x 1.1x -38.8x
EV/EBITDA – 8.7x 9.5x
EV/EBIT – 16.9x 20.4x
EV/Revenue 5.5x 0.4x 0.9x
EV/FCF – 7.8x 6.8x
EV/Operating cash flow -4.0x 6.6x 5.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.25 -0.59 -1.09

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLVWRWGODOO
Revenue growth (1Y) 33.4% -3.4% 20.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.3% -8.2% -6.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -4.1% 17.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -15.8% -12.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 14.5% 15.7% -7.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.9% -39.6% -36.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 9.6% 34.2% -15.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 9.8% -45.7% -52.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 10.1% 33.8% -11.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 10.2% -41.6% -50.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 31.5% 30.9% 96.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.2% -16.9% 1.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 61.6% 259.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -11.9% 13.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLVWRWGODOO
Gross margin – 13.0% 20.6%
EBITDA margin – 4.8% 9.1%
Operating margin – 2.4% 4.2%
Pretax margin – 1.6% 1.8%
Net margin – 1.3% 1.2%
FCF margin – 5.3% 12.7%
Operating cash flow margin -138.2% 6.2% 16.0%
Return on equity – 2.8% 21.6%
Return on assets – 1.7% 1.7%
Return on invested capital – 3.1% 6.0%
Return on capital employed – 3.9% 10.1%
Asset turnover 0.3x 1.3x 1.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.6x 4.9x 13.3x
Stock comp / revenue 14.8% 0.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLVWRWGODOO
Debt / assets – 21.1% 37.7%
Debt / equity – 0.4x 7.5x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.0x 2.1x
Debt / FCF – 3.1x 2.1x
Liabilities / assets 105.3% 41.2% 94.9%
Equity / assets -5.3% 58.8% 5.1%
Interest coverage – 3.2x 1.9x
Current ratio 3.1x 2.2x 1.2x
Quick ratio – 0.9x 0.4x
Cash ratio – 0.5x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – 3.36 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLVWRWGODOO
Dividend yield – 4.7% 1.5%
Net buyback yield – 0.2% -0.8%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 4.9% 0.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 115.7% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 27.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 2.6% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 6.3% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLVWRWGODOO
Forward P/E – 14.2xFY2027 21.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.26FY2026 $2.13FY2027 $2.81FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +19.0%FY2027 -26.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +14.6% +31.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $192.71MFY2026 $2.80BFY2027 $7.01BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +650.7%FY2026 +3.7%FY2027 +13.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +277.5% +5.1% +3.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLVWRWGODOO
Held by institutions 2.0% 100.0% 41.5%
Institutions holding 62 245 143
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.1% +2.6% -0.7%
Institutions buying 32 125 87
Institutions selling 20 85 42
Buyers to sellers 1.60 1.47 2.07

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LVWRWGODOO
LVWR 1.00 0.07 0.09
WGO 0.07 1.00 0.39
DOO 0.09 0.39 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LVWR, WGO and DOO?

Brp (DOO) is the largest by market capitalisation: LiveWire (LVWR) $145.58M, Winnebago Industries (WGO) $857.84M, Brp (DOO) $4.46B.

Which stock is cheaper, LVWR, WGO and DOO?

Winnebago Industries (WGO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (LiveWire (LVWR) -2.0x, Winnebago Industries (WGO) 24.9x, Brp (DOO) 54.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Winnebago Industries (WGO) is cheapest (Winnebago Industries (WGO) 14.2x, Brp (DOO) 21.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

LiveWire (LVWR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: LiveWire (LVWR) +33.4%, Winnebago Industries (WGO) -3.4%, Brp (DOO) +20.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Winnebago Industries (WGO) has the highest net margin (Winnebago Industries (WGO) 1.3%, Brp (DOO) 1.2%). On return on invested capital, Brp (DOO) leads (Winnebago Industries (WGO) 3.1%, Brp (DOO) 6.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Brp (DOO) returned the most: LiveWire (LVWR) -83.7%, Winnebago Industries (WGO) -18.9%, Brp (DOO) -4.4%. Over five years, Brp (DOO) compounded fastest (LiveWire (LVWR) -38.0%/yr, Winnebago Industries (WGO) -14.9%/yr, Brp (DOO) -6.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: LiveWire (LVWR) 0.00%, Winnebago Industries (WGO) 0.05%, Brp (DOO) 0.00%. LiveWire (LVWR) and Brp (DOO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Winnebago Industries (WGO) has been the steadiest (LiveWire (LVWR) 162.3%, Winnebago Industries (WGO) 45.2%, Brp (DOO) 57.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LVWR, WGO and DOO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Winnebago Industries (WGO) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.