LVWR vs MCFT vs THO Stock Comparison

LiveWire, MasterCraft Boat Holdings and Thor Industries Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LVWR LiveWire Group, Inc.
$0.90 -44.4% 1M -83.7% 1Y
Market cap
$141.50M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$33.45M
Div. yield
–
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
1 win
THO Thor Industries Inc
$73.57 +4.8% 1M -29.0% 1Y
Market cap
$3.86B
P/E
21.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.61B
Div. yield
0.03%
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
4 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Thor Industries leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Thor Industries 4, MasterCraft Boat Holdings 3, LiveWire 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLVWRMCFTTHOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $141.50M $369.17M $3.86B THO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.9x -222.1x 21.7x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 10.8x 21.1x MCFT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +33.4% +22.8% +0.3% LVWR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -0.5% 1.8% THO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 4.3% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 0.8x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.03% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -83.7% -0.3% -29.0% MCFT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -38.0%/yr -4.5%/yr -6.3%/yr MCFT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 162.3% 40.0% 39.0% THO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 33/100 49/100 63/100 THO

Percentile Scorecard

LVWRMCFTTHO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLVWRMCFTTHO
Valuation 4 #48 of 50 45 #28 of 50 78 #12 of 50
Growth 88 #7 of 49 17 #41 of 49 15 #42 of 49
Profitability 9 #42 of 46 60 #19 of 46 67 #16 of 46
Financial Health 32 #35 of 51 82 #10 of 51 84 #9 of 51
Shareholder Returns – 43 #17 of 29 71 #9 of 29
Overall 33 49 63
  • LVWR ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • MCFT ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • THO ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLVWRMCFTTHOSPY
1 month -44.4%+5.8%+4.8% +0.7%
3 months -57.9%-13.9%-3.0% +3.7%
6 months -50.5%-9.0%-6.9% +7.1%
Year to date -79.6%+12.3%-28.3% +12.8%
1 year -83.7%-0.3%-29.0% +11.9%
3 years -91.3%+5.6%-14.0% +85.2%
3 years, per year -55.7%+1.8%-4.9% +22.8%
5 years -90.8%-20.7%-27.8% +67.6%
5 years, per year -38.0%-4.5%-6.3% +10.9%
10 years —+89.6%-7.3% +262.0%
10 years, per year —+6.6%-0.8% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLVWRMCFTTHOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 162.3%40.0%39.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 147.5%39.0%40.7% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.130.980.94 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.52-0.01-0.74 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -94.7%-57.6%-50.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -83.7%-22.4%-38.9% -1.2%
52-week high $5.53$27.38$120.34 $779.14
52-week low $0.65$17.21$63.86 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLVWRMCFTTHO
P/E now vs peer median -2.5xmedian 21.7x -219.3xmedian 21.7x 21.7xmedian 21.7x
P/S now vs peer median 5.5xmedian 0.5x 1.0xmedian 0.5x 0.4xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 8.7x 25.6xmedian 8.7x 7.3xmedian 8.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -6.5xmedian 9.4x 16.3xmedian 9.4x 22.5xmedian 9.4x
P/B now vs peer median -33.5xmedian 1.0x 1.0xmedian 1.0x 0.9xmedian 1.0x
PEG now vs peer median -0.25median 1.36 8.27median 1.36 -1.02median 1.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLVWRMCFTTHO
Revenue $33.45M $348.90M $9.61B
Gross profit – $79.78M $1.21B
Operating income -$70.94M -$1.11M $309.23M
Net income -$72.58M -$1.66M $179.04M
Free cash flow – $22.38M $168.84M
EPS (diluted) $-0.35 $-0.10 $3.38
Cash & equivalents $39.92M $43.87M $481.99M
Total debt – – $928.80M
Shares (diluted) 205.04M 17.16M 52.56M
Enterprise value $141.50M $91.98M $2.25B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLVWRMCFTTHO
P/E -2.5x -219.3x 21.7x
P/FCF -6.5x 16.3x 22.5x
P/Operating cash flow -4.0x 12.0x 11.8x
P/S 5.5x 1.0x 0.4x
P/B -33.5x 1.0x 0.9x
P/Tangible book -19.8x 1.2x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA – 25.6x 7.3x
EV/EBIT – -287.9x 13.7x
EV/Revenue 5.5x 0.9x 0.4x
EV/FCF – 14.3x 25.1x
EV/Operating cash flow -4.0x 10.5x 13.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.25 8.27 -1.02

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLVWRMCFTTHO
Revenue growth (1Y) 33.4% 22.8% 0.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.3% -19.2% -4.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 40.3% -9.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -22.2% -8.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 14.5% -109.9% -26.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.9% -26.2% -24.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 9.6% -123.6% -30.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 9.8% -26.5% -21.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 10.1% -122.7% -30.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 10.2% -26.5% -21.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 31.5% -20.2% -44.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.2% -39.3% -31.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -22.9% -62.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -41.5% -39.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLVWRMCFTTHO
Gross margin – 22.9% 12.6%
EBITDA margin – 3.6% 6.0%
Operating margin – -0.3% 3.2%
Pretax margin – 0.4% 2.5%
Net margin – -0.5% 1.8%
FCF margin – 6.4% 1.8%
Operating cash flow margin -138.2% 8.7% 3.3%
Return on equity – -0.6% 4.1%
Return on assets – -0.4% 2.5%
Return on invested capital – – 4.3%
Return on capital employed – -0.4% 5.6%
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.9x 1.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.6x -18.4x 1.8x
Stock comp / revenue 14.8% 1.2% 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLVWRMCFTTHO
Debt / assets – – 13.4%
Debt / equity – – 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 0.8x
Debt / FCF – – 5.5x
Liabilities / assets 105.3% 23.8% 38.7%
Equity / assets -5.3% 76.2% 61.3%
Interest coverage – -5.2x –
Current ratio 3.1x 1.6x 1.8x
Quick ratio – 0.6x 0.6x
Cash ratio – 0.4x 0.3x
Altman Z-score – 3.02 3.48

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLVWRMCFTTHO
Dividend yield – – 2.9%
Net buyback yield – 0.6% 3.0%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 0.6% 5.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 59.7%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 63.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 2.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 4.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLVWRMCFTTHO
Forward P/E – 10.8xFY2027 21.1xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.26FY2026 $1.96FY2027 $3.49FY2027
EPS growth, next FY – +11.4%FY2027 +3.3%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after – +16.8% +34.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $192.71MFY2026 $662.23MFY2027 $9.03BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +650.7%FY2026 +89.8%FY2027 -6.1%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +277.5% -6.5% +17.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLVWRMCFTTHO
Held by institutions 2.0% 72.9% 100.0%
Institutions holding 62 153 410
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.1% +14.6% +2.4%
Institutions buying 32 109 179
Institutions selling 20 27 154
Buyers to sellers 1.60 4.04 1.16

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LVWRMCFTTHO
LVWR 1.00 0.14 0.01
MCFT 0.14 1.00 0.50
THO 0.01 0.50 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LVWR, MCFT and THO?

Thor Industries (THO) is the largest by market capitalisation: LiveWire (LVWR) $141.50M, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) $369.17M, Thor Industries (THO) $3.86B.

Which company is growing faster?

LiveWire (LVWR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: LiveWire (LVWR) +33.4%, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) +22.8%, Thor Industries (THO) +0.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Thor Industries (THO) has the highest net margin (MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) -0.5%, Thor Industries (THO) 1.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) returned the most: LiveWire (LVWR) -83.7%, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) -0.3%, Thor Industries (THO) -29.0%. Over five years, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) compounded fastest (LiveWire (LVWR) -38.0%/yr, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) -4.5%/yr, Thor Industries (THO) -6.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: LiveWire (LVWR) 0.00%, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) 0.00%, Thor Industries (THO) 0.03%. LiveWire (LVWR) and MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Thor Industries (THO) has been the steadiest (LiveWire (LVWR) 162.3%, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) 40.0%, Thor Industries (THO) 39.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LVWR, MCFT and THO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Thor Industries (THO) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.