LVWR vs DOO vs NIU Stock Comparison

LiveWire, Brp and Niu Technologies Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LVWR LiveWire Group, Inc.
$0.90 -44.4% 1M -83.7% 1Y
Market cap
$141.50M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$33.45M
Div. yield
–
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
DOO BRP Inc.
$61.61 +7.4% 1M -4.4% 1Y
Market cap
$4.45B
P/E
54.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.74B
Div. yield
–
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
7 wins
NIU Niu Technologies
$1.88 -2.1% 1M -55.2% 1Y
Market cap
$143.74M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$678.78M
Div. yield
–
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
1 win

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Brp leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Brp 7, Niu Technologies 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLVWRDOONIULeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $141.50M $4.45B $143.74M DOO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.9x 54.8x -4.8x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 21.9x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +33.4% +20.2% +63.4% NIU
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 1.2% -4.4% DOO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 6.0% -19.6% DOO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.1x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -83.7% -4.4% -55.2% DOO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -38.0%/yr -6.9%/yr -41.0%/yr DOO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 162.3% 57.8% 59.5% DOO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 33/100 56/100 42/100 DOO

Percentile Scorecard

LVWRDOONIU

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLVWRDOONIU
Valuation 4 #48 of 50 82 #10 of 50 47 #27 of 50
Growth 88 #7 of 49 52 #24 of 49 50 #25 of 49
Profitability 9 #42 of 46 96 #3 of 46 36 #30 of 46
Financial Health 32 #35 of 51 30 #36 of 51 34 #34 of 51
Shareholder Returns – 21 #23 of 29 –
Overall 33 56 42
  • LVWR ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • DOO ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • NIU ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLVWRDOONIUSPY
1 month -44.4%+7.4%-2.1% +0.7%
3 months -57.9%-1.3%-27.4% +3.7%
6 months -50.5%+10.1%-39.4% +7.1%
Year to date -79.6%-12.9%-38.0% +12.8%
1 year -83.7%-4.4%-55.2% +11.9%
3 years -91.3%-8.2%-7.4% +85.2%
3 years, per year -55.7%-2.8%-2.5% +22.8%
5 years -90.8%-30.1%-92.8% +67.6%
5 years, per year -38.0%-6.9%-41.0% +10.9%
10 years —+208.0%— +262.0%
10 years, per year —+11.9%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLVWRDOONIUSPY
Volatility, 1Y 162.3%57.8%59.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 147.5%70.7%71.6% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.130.941.52 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.52-0.08-0.93 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -94.7%-65.2%-94.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -83.7%-24.5%-55.2% -1.2%
52-week high $5.53$81.64$4.20 $779.14
52-week low $0.65$50.93$1.85 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLVWRDOONIU
P/E now vs peer median -2.5xmedian 21.7x 55.5xmedian 21.7x -5.0xmedian 21.7x
P/S now vs peer median 5.5xmedian 0.5x 0.7xmedian 0.5x 0.2xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 8.7x 9.5xmedian 8.7x —median 8.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -6.5xmedian 9.4x 5.3xmedian 9.4x —median 9.4x
P/B now vs peer median -33.5xmedian 1.0x 18.8xmedian 1.0x 1.4xmedian 1.0x
PEG now vs peer median -0.25median 1.36 -1.09median 1.36 0.18median 1.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLVWRDOONIU
Revenue $33.45M $6.74B $678.78M
Gross profit – $1.39B $123.64M
Operating income -$70.94M $283.70M -$35.73M
Net income -$72.58M $81.25M -$30.56M
Free cash flow – $856.16M –
R&D – $332.77M $26.77M
EPS (diluted) $-0.35 $1.10 $-0.37
Cash & equivalents $39.92M $462.34M $163.70M
Total debt – $7.25B $227.75M
Shares (diluted) 205.04M 73.90M 79.86M
Enterprise value $141.50M $2.82B -$547.14M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLVWRDOONIU
P/E -2.5x 55.5x -5.0x
P/FCF -6.5x 5.3x –
P/Operating cash flow -4.0x 4.2x –
P/S 5.5x 0.7x 0.2x
P/B -33.5x 18.8x 1.4x
P/Tangible book -19.8x -38.8x 1.4x
EV/EBITDA – 9.5x –
EV/EBIT – 20.4x -0.5x
EV/Revenue 5.5x 0.9x 0.0x
EV/FCF – 6.8x –
EV/Operating cash flow -4.0x 5.4x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.25 -1.09 0.18

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLVWRDOONIU
Revenue growth (1Y) 33.4% 20.2% 63.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.3% -6.3% 16.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 17.3% 72.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -12.4% 9.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 14.5% -7.6% -116.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.9% -36.5% -25.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 9.6% -15.6% -43.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 9.8% -52.2% -47.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 10.1% -11.7% -44.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 10.2% -50.7% -27.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 31.5% 96.6% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.2% 1.8% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 259.1% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 13.3% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLVWRDOONIU
Gross margin – 20.6% 18.2%
EBITDA margin – 9.1% –
Operating margin – 4.2% -5.3%
Pretax margin – 1.8% -4.7%
Net margin – 1.2% -4.4%
FCF margin – 12.7% –
Operating cash flow margin -138.2% 16.0% –
Return on equity – 21.6% -27.2%
Return on assets – 1.7% -6.3%
Return on invested capital – 6.0% -19.6%
Return on capital employed – 10.1% -42.2%
Asset turnover 0.3x 1.4x 1.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.6x 13.3x –
Stock comp / revenue 14.8% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLVWRDOONIU
Debt / assets – 37.7% 12.8%
Debt / equity – 7.5x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.1x –
Debt / FCF – 2.1x –
Liabilities / assets 105.3% 94.9% 79.4%
Equity / assets -5.3% 5.1% 20.6%
Interest coverage – 1.9x -40.4x
Current ratio 3.1x 1.2x 1.0x
Quick ratio – 0.4x 0.5x
Cash ratio – 0.2x 0.5x
Altman Z-score – – 0.82

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLVWRDOONIU
Dividend yield – 1.5% –
Net buyback yield – -0.8% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 0.7% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLVWRDOONIU
Forward P/E – 21.9xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.26FY2026 $2.81FY2026 $-0.37FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -26.4%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +31.7% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $192.71MFY2026 $7.01BFY2026 $758.50MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +650.7%FY2026 +13.1%FY2026 +23.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +277.5% +3.0% +20.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLVWRDOONIU
Held by institutions 2.0% 41.5% 7.2%
Institutions holding 62 143 50
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.1% -0.7% -17.0%
Institutions buying 32 87 21
Institutions selling 20 42 17
Buyers to sellers 1.60 2.07 1.24

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LVWRDOONIU
LVWR 1.00 0.09 0.12
DOO 0.09 1.00 0.04
NIU 0.12 0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LVWR, DOO and NIU?

Brp (DOO) is the largest by market capitalisation: LiveWire (LVWR) $141.50M, Brp (DOO) $4.45B, Niu Technologies (NIU) $143.74M.

Which company is growing faster?

Niu Technologies (NIU) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: LiveWire (LVWR) +33.4%, Brp (DOO) +20.2%, Niu Technologies (NIU) +63.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Brp (DOO) has the highest net margin (Brp (DOO) 1.2%, Niu Technologies (NIU) -4.4%). On return on invested capital, Brp (DOO) leads (Brp (DOO) 6.0%, Niu Technologies (NIU) -19.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Brp (DOO) returned the most: LiveWire (LVWR) -83.7%, Brp (DOO) -4.4%, Niu Technologies (NIU) -55.2%. Over five years, Brp (DOO) compounded fastest (LiveWire (LVWR) -38.0%/yr, Brp (DOO) -6.9%/yr, Niu Technologies (NIU) -41.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Brp (DOO) has been the steadiest (LiveWire (LVWR) 162.3%, Brp (DOO) 57.8%, Niu Technologies (NIU) 59.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LVWR, DOO and NIU?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Brp (DOO) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.